Powered by Lexis+®

Related Glossary Terms

CASE STUDY

“Because of the pure breadth and depth of black letter law research and practical guidance that LexisNexis provides, we don't have to rely on counsel as much as perhaps firms that don't use LexisNexis.”

KaurMaxwell

Access all documents on Honest comment

Honest comment meaning

What does Honest comment mean?
Honest comment describes the defamation defence that protects statements of opinion (rather than assertions of fact) where the writer or speaker genuinely holds the view and it is based on identified, true or privileged facts. In practice, this defence is now more commonly called honest opinion and, in many jurisdictions, has replaced the common law defence of fair comment. In England and Wales, section 3 of the Defamation Act 2013 defines the defence: the statement must be recognisable as opinion; the basis of the opinion must be indicated; and an honest person could have held the opinion on the basis of any existing fact or a privileged statement. The defence is defeated if the claimant proves the defendant did not genuinely hold the opinion. Scotland has a similar statutory defence under section 7 of the Defamation and Malicious Publication (Scotland) Act 2021. Ireland provides a statutory defence of honest opinion in section 20 of the Defamation Act 2009. In Northern Ireland, the common law defence of fair comment broadly continues to apply; “honest comment” there is a descriptive label rather than a statutory term.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Practice Notes about Honest comment

PRACTICE NOTES
Statutory and Common Law Defamation Defences in England and Wales: Truth, Honest Opinion, Privilege, Public Interest, Offers of Amends, Online Intermediary Protections and SLAPPs Reform

Defences There are several substantive defences to a defamation action and, since the Defamation Act 2013 (DA 2013), most are now statutory. Multiple defences can be advanced together in answer to a claim. Truth Defamatory statements are presumed to be untrue, and the onus of proving their truth rests with the defendant. Showing that the substance of the defamatory statement is true is a complete defence. The defence formerly known as justification was given statutory effect by DA 2013, s 2; the common law defence was abolished and section 5 of the Defamation Act 1952 repealed. Pleading and procedural matters in defamation proceedings are governed by CPR PD 53B, which contains particular requirements for truth defences. CPR PD 53B replaced CPR PD 53 with effect from 1 October 2019 (see News Analyses: 109th practice direction update—July to October 2019 and New rules for media and communications claims from 1 October 2019). It is the substance or essence of the defamatory allegation that needs to be...

Read More Right Arrow