Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“The forms and precedents section is essential so that I can quickly and easily look up provisions to include in templates or bespoke project contracts.”

RWE

Access all documents on Hybrid funds

Hybrid funds meaning

What does Hybrid funds mean?
In practice, a hybrid fund is an investment fund that blends features of closed‑ended and open‑ended structures. The term is descriptive rather than defined in legislation or case law, but is widely used in UK and Irish funds practice. Typical legal features include: investors committing capital with drawdowns during an investment period (as in closed‑ended private equity funds), combined with limited periodic subscriptions and redemptions (as in open‑ended funds). Liquidity is usually constrained by a lock‑in/lock‑up period, notice requirements, dealing windows and “gates”, and may permit suspensions. The fund may have a fixed term with extension options, recycling and distribution waterfalls. These mechanics are set out in the constitutional documents, prospectus/offering memorandum and limited partnership agreement. Hybrid funds are common for private credit, infrastructure, real estate and secondary strategies, where some investor liquidity is offered without fully open‑ended redemption rights. In the UK and Ireland they are generally alternative investment funds (AIFs) managed by an AIFM under the onshored UK AIFM regime or the EU AIFMD (Ireland). Structures include English or Scottish limited partnerships, Irish ICAVs and unit trusts. Usage and legal treatment are broadly consistent across England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland, subject to regulatory and document‑specific liquidity terms.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Hybrid funds

NEWS
TPR employer covenant guidance for DB funding code; BoE LDI resilience; PPF Purple Book; scheme return and dashboards updates; PLSA backs Mansion House, biodiversity guide; Ombudsman orders pension liberation repayments

In this issue: Funding and investment Scheme governance Pension scams and liberation Daily and weekly news alerts Dates for your diary Trackers Funding and investment TPR publishes revised employer covenant guidance to align with new DB funding code of practice The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has at last issued revised guidance on the employer covenant for trustees overseeing defined benefit (DB) pension schemes, to align with its new DB funding code of practice, which took effect on 12 November 2024 under the Pensions Act 2004 (Code of Practice) (Defined Benefit Funding) Appointed Day Order 2024 (SI 2024/1143). Described by TPR as ‘the last piece of the jigsaw to help schemes carry out valuations under the new DB funding code’, the update introduces the first regulatory definition of employer covenant, intended to deliver greater market certainty and foster consistency between schemes. Notable changes cover cash flow analysis, tests of reasonable affordability, maximum affordable contributions, reliability periods, covenant longevity, and...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Remote and Hybrid Working: Client Due Diligence under the Money Laundering Regulations 2017—Risk Assessment, E‑Verification, Deepfake Mitigation, Reliance and Practical Controls for Law Firms

See Q&A: What CDD challenges could remote working present? If your practice falls within the scope of the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (MLR 2017), SI 2017/692, as amended, you are required to meet the statutory obligations at all times, regardless of how or where you work. The coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak drove a broad move to remote working that largely persists; nevertheless, confirming who your client is and checking their identity remains essential and central to client due diligence (CDD). Offenders did not stop during the pandemic and some attempted to exploit the circumstances. With remote and hybrid models enduring, many of the CDD issues first examined then are still pertinent, as criminals continue seeking opportunities to take advantage. You should factor the risks of representing clients without an in-person meeting into your firm-wide risk assessment (FWRA). That assessment must in turn flow through into the policies, controls and procedures you implement to mitigate the risks you have identified. For...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK and EU financial services regulatory roundup—authorisations, prudential, operational resilience, payments and APP fraud, enforcement and sanctions, capital markets, ESG and MiCA (10 October 2024 edition)

In this issue: UK, EU and international regulators and bodies Permissions, approvals and oversight Prudential rules Operational robustness Financial misconduct and sanctions Complaints, redress and claims handling Investigations, enforcement and disciplinary action Capital markets regulation Packaged Retail and Insurance-based Investment Products (PRIIPs) Derivatives regulation Sustainable finance and ESG Banks and mutuals Investment funds and asset management EU MiFID II Insurance regulation Payment services and systems Fintech and cryptoassets Financial Services Enforcement Database Daily and weekly news alerts Intraday news alerts New and refreshed content Key dates for your diary UK, EU and international regulators and bodies Amendments to EEA Agreement Annex IX (Financial Services) published in Official Journal Twelve decisions of the European Economic Area (EEA) Joint Committee revising Annex IX (Financial Services) to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (the EEA Agreement) have appeared in the EU’s Official Journal....

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Hybrid funds

PRACTICE NOTES
UK withholding tax on yearly interest: a practitioner’s guide to statutory exemptions, treaty relief, ceased regimes and practical compliance, including UK‑to‑UK, quoted eurobond and QPP rules

Except where an exemption or relief applies, payments of: annual interest (or amounts that tax rules treat as annual interest), and that have a UK source must be made under deduction, with the payer required to withhold and account to HMRC for UK income tax at the basic rate (20%) or, from 6 April 2027, at the savings basic rate (22%) (for more detail, see Practice Note: UK withholding tax on yearly interest). This Practice Note describes the duty to deduct (and account to HMRC for) UK income tax from UK‑source annual interest as a withholding tax, even though it is in substance a mechanism for collecting UK income tax from the UK‑based payer rather than from the recipient who: is the beneficial owner of the income, and is likely to be based outside the UK For more information on the requirement to deduct UK income tax from UK‑source annual interest, see Practice Note: Administration...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Capital call (subscription line) facilities: commercial uses, due diligence, security, borrowing base and facility terms, with NAV and hybrid comparisons

This Practice Note discusses the meaning of capital call facilities, 'NAV' or asset-backed facilities, and hybrid facilities the commercial applications of capital call facilities the due diligence that lenders will undertake the standard security package typically required by lenders the principal terms of capital call facilities 'Capital call facilities' and other types of fund finance A capital call facility, also known as a subscription line facility, is financing extended by a lender to a fund and is ordinarily collateralised by investors’ undrawn commitments. Accordingly, funds tend to obtain these lines early in their life cycle, when unfunded commitments are at their highest yet the fund holds few or no investments that can be charged in favour of lenders. Nevertheless, particularly where recallable capital commitments persist (see below), capital call facilities can remain beneficial well into the fund’s term. By contrast, funds that are at the halfway stage or approaching the end of their life cycle may find that...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
UK tax classification of overseas entities: transparency versus opacity, key case law and HMRC’s post-Anson guidance and clearance practice

Characterising overseas entities for UK tax purposes It is essential to characterise overseas entities for UK tax, as this determines how they, their members and potentially other connected persons are taxed... Transparent — treated in a similar manner to a partnership or certain trusts for UK tax; not a taxable person in its own right for direct taxes; profits are commonly assessed on UK‑resident members as they arise, whether or not distributed Opaque — broadly treated like a company and therefore a taxable person; its profits are typically not taxed in the UK until paid out to UK‑resident members, or where anti‑avoidance rules attribute undistributed profits to another person (eg under controlled foreign company rules) Opaque for capital gains but transparent for income — a hybrid approach applying in particular to some non‑UK unit trust schemes and non‑corporate offshore funds Distributions received from an opaque overseas entity also need to be characterised (as either...

Read More Right Arrow