IA meaning

Assistance with the checklist This summary checklist and timeline presuppose that the trustee in bankruptcy (trustee) is ready to file an application to the court for an order for possession and sale of a property in which the bankrupt previously held an interest that now vests in the trustee under section 306 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986). It also assumes the trustee has written to the owners to try to realise their interest without issuing court proceedings, and that it is the appropriate moment to make the application. If the property is of a type within IA 1986, s 283A(1), then unless the trustee takes certain steps before the third anniversary of the bankruptcy order—among them applying to court for a possession and sale order—the trustee’s interest in that property will automatically re-vest in the bankrupt. Accordingly, the trustee must take timely steps in relation to the property...

Under section 279(1) of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) A bankrupt is released from bankruptcy automatically at the expiry of one year starting on the date the bankruptcy order is made, pursuant to section 279(1) of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986). In some circumstances, however, it is preferable to apply to the court for an order suspending that automatic discharge. This concise checklist and timetable addresses applications to suspend automatic discharge from bankruptcy, outlining each stage from preparing the application for issue through to the making of the suspension from discharge order, together with matters to be dealt with after the order is made. The checklist and timetable do not apply to criminal bankruptcies under IA 1986, ss 264 and 280, nor to applications by the official receiver (OR) under the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016 (IR 2016), SI 2016/1024, r 10.104(5) following the adjournment of a public examination. Step/action Time (days) Section/rule 1...

Administrator appointed by the court Where the court appoints an administrator under paragraph 11 of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986), following an application by the company, its directors and/or one or more creditors, the title deeds should include certified copies of: the administration order; and any further order(s) under IA 1986, Sch B1, paras 91–95 appointing a new administrator after the death, resignation or removal from office of the original or any later administrator Administrator appointed by holder(s) of qualifying charge, the company or its directors Where the administrator is appointed by the holder(s) of a qualifying floating charge (IA 1986, Sch B1, para 14) or by the company or its directors (IA 1986, Sch B1, para 22), the title deeds should include certified copies of: the notice of appointment: in a form complying with IA 1986, Sch B1, para 14 and the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules...

Thiel-Czerwinke and another (joint liquidators of Courtside Recycling Ltd) v Crabb [2024] EWHC 337 (Ch) What are the practical implications of this case? This ruling underlines the uncompromising obligation on directors to maintain trading records, and accepts that discarding or failing to retain them was, on these facts, a constituent part of the director’s fraudulent design. It also clarifies that once office-holders demonstrate that company assets or cash were transferred to a director, the absence of documents showing that the funds or property were applied for the company’s advantage renders the director liable to repay the whole amount to the company. That outcome applies even though the judge did not doubt that Mr Crabb did in fact use some of the cash when making payments for Courtside... What was the background? Mr Crabb served as the Company’s sole director; the business dealt in scrap metal. For the trading periods from August 2014 to February 2018, the Company submitted VAT returns declaring sales, net of VAT, totalling...

Christopher Purkiss (as liquidator of Ethos Solutions Limited) v Tim Kennedy and others [2025] EWCA Civ 268 Ethos Solutions Limited (the Company) ran a disguised remuneration arrangement under which sums were channelled to an employee benefit trust (EBT) without withholding income tax or NICs. The EBT’s trustee allocated funds into sub-trusts for the respondents and, when asked, advanced the amounts to them as discretionary loans. On 4 December 2012, HMRC issued determinations, holding the Company liable for income tax and NICs of c.£2m arising from payments made to the EBT in the 2008‑09 and 2009‑10 tax years. On 18 December 2012, the Company entered creditors’ voluntary liquidation, making no remittances to HMRC and taking no steps to appeal. On 9 January 2013, HMRC lodged a proof of debt totalling c.£2m with respect to those same EBT payments, as claimed therein...

Webb and another (in their capacity as joint liquidators of Eversholt Rail (365) Ltd (in liquidation)) v Eversholt Rail Ltd and another company [2024] EWHC 2217 (Ch) What are the practical implications of this case? This case serves as a reminder to insolvency practitioners that orders under IA 1986, s 235 and IA 1986, s 236 are not automatic; a cogent justification is needed explaining why specified documents are reasonably required. Requests should be tightly focused in both timeframe and in the categories or classes of documents sought. The judge criticised not only the lack of specificity in the evidence, but also the failure to explain that lack. As the court has a broad discretion and will weigh a range of considerations, a request that is relatively unfocused may still be granted if there is a satisfactory reason it cannot be more precise, for example a complete lack of co-operation from the other side. What was the background? This application was made in relation to Eversholt...

The resolution to wind-up A company can move into voluntary liquidation only if one of the following applies: its fixed duration has ended, or an event specified in its articles as triggering liquidation has occurred, and the company has approved an ordinary resolution to wind up; or it passes a special resolution to be wound up voluntarily. See: 97 Notice of meeting to pass ordinary or special resolution to wind up: Encyclopaedia of Forms and Precedents [1441] 103 Special resolution to wind up and appoint liquidator: Encyclopaedia of Forms and Precedents [1452] The former practice of proceeding by extraordinary resolution is no longer available under the Companies Act 2006. Where the directors make a declaration of solvency under section 89 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986), the company may proceed by way of a members’ voluntary liquidation (MVL). For further information, see Practice Note: What is a members’ voluntary liquidation and when is...

Offence of re-using company name without permission The Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) curtails the re-use of a company’s name for five years where, in the year leading up to insolvency, any director or shadow director of the insolvent company becomes involved with the successor entity (see Who is caught by the restriction?). A director must not participate in a business that adopts the identical legal or trading name, or a name so alike as to imply a link with the earlier company, unless an exception applies (see Scope of restriction). Importantly, this curb is imposed on the individual rather than the company itself, as there are numerous innocent or practical reasons why different companies may carry the same or a comparable name. Under IA 1986, s 216, breaching this curb constitutes a criminal offence, and section 217 is aimed at removing the financial attraction of exploiting insolvency by allowing creditors to seek to pierce the corporate veil and by rendering any director (or any accomplice) who contravenes section...

This Practice Note reviews the factors the court will take into account and the test it will adopt when considering an application by a trustee in bankruptcy (the trustee) seeking orders for possession and sale of the bankrupt’s home, including accommodation occupied by the bankrupt’s family... For further reading on making possession and sale applications and on the timing of any application, see Practice Notes: Possession and sale applications in respect of a bankrupt’s family home The ‘three-year rule’ in bankruptcy under section 283A of the Insolvency Act 1986 Applications for possession and sale of the family home Where a trustee applies to the court for possession and sale, they will, amongst other things, need both an order for sale and an order for vacant possession. In substance this is a two-stage exercise, yet, in practice, it is usually addressed within a single application. If the property is jointly owned, section 14 of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees...

VAR Insolvency Act Application Notice Note: This precedent should be used in conjunction with an application notice template complying with the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016, SI 2016/1024—refer to: (Form IAA) IR 2016, r 1.35 Court Reference No: [ INSERT COURT REF ]...

UNDER PARAGRAPH 64 OF SCHEDULE B1 TO THE INSOLVENCY ACT 1986 By virtue of paragraph 64 of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986), [ insert names of the administrators ] (the Joint Administrators), being the joint administrators of [ insert name of company ] (the Company), consent to the Directors of the Company (the Directors) exercising the powers described below as set out herein. This consent is provided strictly on the basis that the Joint Administrators have certified that the administration is reasonably likely to secure the rescue of the Company as a going concern for that sole purpose. The Joint Administrators are further reasonably satisfied that the Company has sufficient funding to meet essential key post-administration outgoings, including rent, employee salaries, utilities and suppliers, on a continuing, ongoing basis. Save as aforesaid, the Joint Administrators do not authorise the Directors to exercise any other powers at this time; however, they remain fully prepared to consider additional requests for further consents, if and when required, where...

Introduction The current time is [ insert the exact time ] and I commence the creditors' meeting of [ insert name of the company or LLP (Company) ], convened as a general meeting of creditors pursuant to the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) and the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016 (IR 2016), SI 2016/1024, as amended. My name is [ insert name ], of [ insert firm or company name ], acting as [ insert details of role of the chair, eg adviser/[joint] administrator/[provisional] liquidator etc ]. The meeting being held today is quorate, as the required minimum number of creditors is in attendance...

Right to rent scheme The duties imposed by the right to rent scheme extend to all relevant lettings described in Practice Note: Residential tenancies—a tenant’s right to rent under the Immigration Act 2014, except where a letting is an excluded tenancy set out in Schedule 3 to the Immigration Act 2014 (IA 2014), also cited in that Practice Note. Be aware that social housing—as defined in IA 2014, Sch 3—is outside scope entirely...

In partnership with Alexander Stewart of Hogarth Chambers If a limited liability partnership (LLP) becomes insolvent, the preferred view is that members’ entitlements to amounts due under their capital and current accounts are subordinated to the claims of external unsecured creditors. That said, it can be contended that members’ claims for advances or loans made to the LLP—despite being entered in their current accounts—stand on the same footing as those of external unsecured creditors. LLPs are established by the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 (LLPA 2000). In several respects, including insolvency, LLPs are akin to limited companies rather than partnerships; see: Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) and insolvency—overview. Where an LLP is insolvent, it is terminated by voluntary or compulsory winding-up. The winding-up regime under the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) operates alongside LLPA 2000, s 14 and the Limited Liability Partnerships Regulations 2001 (LLPR 2001), SI 2001/1090, reg 5 and LLPR 2001, SI 2001/1090, Sch 3 (as amended)...

In this Q&A, we assume that B’s claim is smaller than A’s. Legal process against the company Under paragraph 43(2) of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986), the moratorium prevents any legal process—covering legal proceedings, execution, distress and diligence—from being started or continued against the company or its property without the administrator’s consent or the court’s permission. This wording is wide enough to encompass any remaining actions or steps that might otherwise be taken against the company or its property. Accordingly, B can only bring an action against A with the approval of the administrator or the leave of the court. The purpose of the moratorium (and the interim moratorium) is to safeguard the company and its assets from creditor action during the company’s administration and the pre-appointment period. It bars any steps, actions or processes from being begun or carried on against the company and its property, save with the administrator’s consent (if one is appointed) or the court’s permission. See Practice...