Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“Although cost was an important factor, our relationship with LexisNexis, their responsiveness, flexibility, and the integration available with other products were key factors.”

Irwin Mitchell

Access all documents on IA Principles of Remuneration

IA Principles of Remuneration meaning

What does IA Principles of Remuneration mean?
The IA Principles of Remuneration are investor guidelines used in practice by remuneration committees to design, implement and disclose executive pay for UK listed companies, setting out shareholder expectations on structure, quantum and alignment with long‑term performance. They are not defined in legislation or case law; they are market guidance published by the Investment Association (which took over the ABI’s remuneration guidance after the ABI investment affairs division merged into the IA in 2014) and updated periodically. Key features include expectations on fixed and variable pay, long‑term incentive plans (LTIPs) and restricted shares, discretion, malus and clawback, post‑employment shareholding, pension alignment with the wider workforce, treatment of windfall gains, and clear, accessible disclosure. The Principles complement the Companies Act 2006 directors’ remuneration policy and report regime, the Listing Rules and the UK Corporate Governance Code. They are frequently cited in shareholder engagement and when drafting or revising remuneration policies and remuneration reports. Practical significance: the IA’s Institutional Voting Information Service (IVIS) assesses issuers against the Principles and may flag concerns (for example, amber or red tops), influencing AGM voting outcomes. Usage is consistent across England & Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. In Ireland, the Principles are not binding but are often followed...
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about IA Principles of Remuneration

NEWS
UK share incentives update: ISS 2025 proxy voting (UK & Ireland) including 5% dilution, SIP trustee voting, CSOP valuations, and FCA PISCES sandbox consultation deadline

In this issue: Corporate governance Q&As New and revised content Key dates for your diary Weekly highlights across other practice areas Corporate governance ISS Governance has released its 2025 Proxy Voting Guidelines for the UK and Ireland, following the publication of its updated benchmark policies on 17 December 2024 (see: Share Incentives weekly highlights—19 December 2024—Corporate governance), and these will apply to shareholder meetings held on or after 1 February 2025. The revised guidelines mirror the changes announced in December, many of which incorporated amendments made by the Investment Association (IA) to its Principles of Remuneration issued in October 2024. Nonetheless, departing from the new IA Principles, ISS Governance considers a 5 per cent dilution limit to remain widely viewed as best practice by many investors—and therefore expects that authorisations to issue new shares under discretionary share schemes should not exceed 5 per cent of the issued ordinary share capital over any rolling ten-year period; where this is breached, an...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK share incentives: ISS 2025 remuneration policies, AGM voting trends, FRC to govern Wates Principles, FCA PISCES consultation, non-dom changes, NICs Bill, OBR forecast, EOT/EBT updates

In this issue: Corporate governance Regulatory Global incentive issues Budgets, Autumn Statements and Finance Bills Q&As Useful information Share Incentives Weekly Highlights 2024/25 Weekly highlights from other practice areas Corporate governance ISS Governance announces 2025 benchmark policy updates ISS Governance, a prominent global source of impartial shareholder meeting research and voting guidance, has unveiled revisions to its 2025 Benchmark proxy voting policies. These changes will typically apply to shareholder meetings scheduled on or after 1 February 2025. For the UK and Ireland, updates on remuneration matters are particularly notable: Revisions broadly align with the refreshed Investment Association (IA) Principles of Remuneration issued in October 2024 (see: Share Incentives weekly highlights—10 October 2024—Investment Association publishes updated ‘Principles of Remuneration’) and the January 2024 amendments to the UK Corporate Governance Code (see: Share Incentives weekly highlights—25 January 2024—Corporate governance). Although ISS has adjusted elements to mirror the updated IA Principles concerning dilution parameters,...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK share incentives weekly: Takeover Code scope narrowed; IA remuneration principles updated; HMRC Manuals changes; Autumn Budget 2024 EOT reforms; cross-practice corporate, tax and employment highlights

In this issue: Corporate transactions and share incentives New and updated content HMRC Manuals tracker Useful information Weekly highlights from other practice areas Corporate transactions and share incentives Takeover Panel issues response on companies to which the Takeover Code applies The Takeover Panel (the Panel) has released Panel Statement 2024/24 and Response Statement RS 2024/1 concerning its consultation on the companies to which the Takeover Code (the Code) applies. PCP 2024/1, issued in April 2024 (see: Share Incentives weekly highlights—25 April 2024—Corporation transactions and share incentives), outlined a new jurisdictional model aimed at narrowing the range of companies subject to the Code. As a result, the framework will capture fewer companies than before. The Panel has opted to implement the consultation’s proposals, albeit with certain amendments. The key deviation from PCP 2024/1 is that both the run-off and transition periods are to be two years rather than three...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about IA Principles of Remuneration

PRACTICE NOTES
COVID-19 and Executive Pay in the UK: Government Support Restrictions, Investor Expectations and Corporate Governance Guidance [Archived]

ARCHIVED : This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained. The government set out a series of actions in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) emergency. For more information, see the following Practice Notes: Coronavirus (COVID-19)—tax implications [Archived] Coronavirus (COVID-19)—key issues for Corporate lawyers This Practice Note offers a high-level overview of how the coronavirus situation affected executive remuneration and monitors updates issued by the government and the principal institutional investor organisations. For wider coverage of the impact on share plans, refer to Practice Note: Coronavirus (COVID-19) impact on share schemes. For broader background on the leading institutional investor bodies, see Practice Notes: Directors’ remuneration—institutional investor guidelines and Comparison of UK Corporate Governance remuneration principles. The coronavirus job retention scheme and the Job Support Scheme (JSS) The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS), first announced on 20 March 2020, supported UK employers through grants to help them continue paying up to 80% of salary for unworked hours (capped at £2,500...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
UK long-term incentive plans: benefits, design flexibility and risks; IA 2024 guidance and governance expectations; Companies Act 2006 and tax issues; market practice including restricted and hybrid alternatives

A long-term incentive plan (LTIP) Within listed companies, the term LTIP typically refers to executive share arrangements whereby senior staff receive share-based awards that vest over no less than three years, usually followed by a further two-year holding requirement. For an introduction to LTIPs, see Practice Note: What is a long-term incentive plan? Using LTIPs to drive senior executive performance has become accepted market practice among listed companies. Yet, in July 2016, the Executive Remuneration Working Group—an independent body formed by the Investment Association—issued its final report on the design of executive pay, urging every company to assess whether the conventional LTIP model remained suitable for its business or if it should depart from that approach. In the Working Group’s view, rather than defaulting to an LTIP, companies must identify the structure that best fits their organisation and engage with shareholders to gauge their views on the preferred framework. The emphasis was on careful selection of pay structures and meaningful dialogue with shareholders before settling on any model, rather...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
UK corporate governance reforms 2017–2019: Companies (Miscellaneous Reporting) Regulations 2018, UKCG Code, Wates Principles, AIM/QCA updates, s172 reporting, CEO pay ratios, BEIS and Kingman reviews (archived)

This archived Practice Note summarised a wide range of corporate governance reforms announced or brought into force during 2017–2019, such as the Companies (Miscellaneous Reporting) Regulations 2018, the 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code, the Wates Corporate Governance Principles, the 2018 revisions made to the AIM Rules and to the QCA Code, the BEIS consultation on insolvency and corporate governance, and the Kingman review. It has not been refreshed since 2019. Background In November 2016, the government, acting through the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS), published a Green Paper on corporate governance reform (Green Paper). The Green Paper sought views on areas where changes to the UK’s corporate governance framework were being considered: executive pay enhancing the voice of employees, customers and wider stakeholders extending elements of the corporate governance regime to large private companies The government invited comments and submissions on the Green Paper by 17 February 2017. Following the consultation, in August 2017 the government issued...

Read More Right Arrow