Identification meaning

This Checklist This Checklist highlights key matters to weigh up when preparing and finalising a retention bond for a construction scheme. For additional guidance on retention bonds, see Practice Note: Retention bonds. Parties A party whose registered office is outside England and Wales may need to nominate an address for service within England and Wales. Consider carefully before accepting a surety located beyond the UK and, where relevant, confirm the surety is properly authorised to issue bonds in the UK. Always include company registration numbers to enable future identification of the companies. ...

ARCHIVED: This Flowchart has been archived and is not maintained. Retained EU law is a concept introduced by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (EU(W)A 2018) as part of Brexit preparations, establishing a new category of domestic legislation. It denotes the collection of EU‑derived rules preserved and converted into UK law under the EU(W)A 2018 (as amended) at the end of the post‑Brexit transition period (IP completion day). For background on the transition period, and what it means for retained EU law, see: In the context of Brexit, what is meant by the ‘transition or implementation period’? For further background reading on the underlying legislation, see: Practice Note: Brexit—key legislation explained News Analysis: What does IP completion day mean for the status of EU law in the UK? What is retained EU law? Retained EU law is a broad, complex legal term defined by the EU(W)A 2018. It covers anything that continues to form part of domestic law on or...

This Checklist highlights the matters a tenant should consider before issuing a section 26 request under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (LTA 1954) to seek a new tenancy, whether during the fixed term or while the statutory continuation tenancy subsists. It addresses the tenant’s proposals, the intended start date of the new tenancy, and the identification of the competent landlord. For further guidance, see Practice Note: LTA 1954 business lease renewal—termination. What is the nature of the tenancy? A section 26 request is only valid in relation to the following: a tenancy for a term of years certain exceeding one year, whether or not carried on under LTA 1954, s 24; or a tenancy granted for a term of years certain, and then continuing from year to year Therefore, a section 26 request cannot be served if either of the following apply: the tenancy is a periodic tenancy, other than a yearly periodic tenancy that follows a...

The Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023 (REUL(RR)A 2023) confers a suite of legislative powers, allowing the relevant national authorities to reshape retained EU law (REUL) by making secondary legislation to amend, revoke, restate and/or replace REUL and assimilated law. Its principal powers are located in REUL(RR)A 2023, ss 11–16. The core procedural obligations (including parliamentary scrutiny routes) for these instruments appear in REUL(RR)A 2023, s 20 and Schs 4–5. REUL(RR)A 2023 sifting process—background Under REUL(RR)A 2023, before specified statutory instruments (referred to here as ‘REUL reform SIs’) are formally presented to Parliament, they must first undergo a preliminary sifting exercise to confirm the suitable parliamentary procedure. Details of the sifting mechanism are set out in REUL(RR)A 2023, Sch 5 Pt 2, para 6...

Long-trailed changes appended to the Crime and Policing Bill 2025, laid before Parliament by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper on 25 February 2025, aim to broaden corporate criminal liability and fortify investigations to recoup the assets of fraudsters. The draft law would likewise curb the financial risks borne by enforcers in litigation. Here, Law360 flags three aspects of the government’s new Bill you may have overlooked. Corporate criminal liability widens The centrepiece for white-collar specialists is a plan to extend the spectrum of offences for which a corporate body can face criminal liability when they are committed by senior managers. After years of prosecutorial frustration, the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA 2023) overhauled the legal test, allowing authorities such as the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) to hold companies liable for economic offences carried out by their senior managers. These fresh measures would go further. The Bill would reshape the legal test, known as the identification doctrine, so it embraces all kinds of crime in principle and...

In this issue: Medical devices Intellectual property Data protection and life sciences Pharmaceuticals—regulatory framework Research and development Competition in life sciences Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Trackers Useful information Medical devices Government supports new UK medical device rules following consultation The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has issued the government’s concluding response to its consultation on planned updates to medical device legislation, setting out future pathways to market for medical devices. The government will advance three principal changes: adopting an international reliance framework, removing the UKCA marking requirement once devices carry unique device identification (UDI), and revising the classification of in vitro diagnostic (IVD) devices. Collectively, these measures are intended to modernise oversight while promoting innovation and protecting patient safety. See: LNB News 23/07/2025 14. AI developers, users see EU’s guidelines on general-purpose AI models MLex: On 18 July 2025, the European Commission released guidance...

Nimbus: The Disability Consultancy Service Limited v HMRC [2026] UKFTT 38 (TC) The Appellant created and rolled out an ‘Access Card’ to assist disabled people in communicating their access needs to venues and service providers, and to act as recognised proof of those needs. To apply for an Access Card (or a Digital Access Pass), a customer uploads evidence of disability such as confirmation of disability living allowance, personal independence payments, or particular medical information. They also upload photographic identification, for example a driving licence or passport. The Appellant then examines this material to determine access requirements. If the application is approved, an Access Card (or Digital Access Pass) is issued to the successful applicant. The card carries printed symbols indicating the holder’s specific access requirements...

Proving the identity of the driver Where the bench is satisfied the defendant was served with a notice under section 172 of the Road Traffic Act 1988, and the court receives a statement from the defendant admitting they were the driver, that statement is accepted as proof of identity. If no such admission exists—either because a RTA 1988, s 172 notice was not properly served in line with the Criminal Procedure Rules 2025 (CrimPR 2025), SI 2025/909, Pt 4, or the allegation is not one to which section 172 applies—the magistrates will look to other material. Information provided by the registered keeper to police during interview or questioning Entries held on the police national database See: Creed v Scott [1976] RTR 485 (not reported by LexisNexis®) and DPP v Bayliff [2003] EWHC 539 (Admin) (not reported by LexisNexis®). Details supplied to the police may suffice to prove who was driving; it is immaterial whether a driving licence is produced to confirm name...

Money Laundering Regulations 2017 and Money Laundering Regulations 2020 The Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (MLR 2017), SI 2017/692, sit within the UK’s anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing framework. They took effect on 26 June 2017 to implement the EU’s Fourth Anti-Money Laundering Directive, Directive (EU) 2015/849 (4MLD), and have subsequently been broadened significantly by the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020 (MLR 2020), SI 2020/991. Those 2020 amendments give effect to aspects of the EU’s Fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive, Directive (EU) 2018/843 (5MLD), concerning the registration of trusts. The Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (Amendment) Regulations 2019, SI 2019/1511, also transposed elements of 5MLD into UK law; however, they addressed areas other than trust registration and therefore fall outside the ambit of this Practice Note. Unless indicated otherwise, references in this Practice Note to MLR 2017, SI 2017/692, should be read as including the changes introduced by MLR 2020, SI 2020/991. The chief focus of...

When considering entry into a joint venture, participants should carefully scrutinise the identity of the other intended parties and the experience and resources they expect to bring to the venture. They are, therefore, likely to want to ensure those parties remain engaged in the joint venture (at least for a pre‑agreed period of time) and to retain controls over to whom they may transfer their shares. The nature of any share transfer constraints adopted will also depend on, among other things, the anticipated duration of the joint venture, how the parties propose to realise their investments, the cash‑flow and fundraising requirements of the parties, and any share transfer restrictions contained in other transaction documents, e.g. financing documents. Restrictions on transfer For these reasons, most joint venture agreements (JVA) (also known as shareholders’ agreements) and/or the articles of association will include a series of restrictions governing the transfer of shares by the joint venture parties...

From: [ insert name of production company ] at [ insert address ] (the Producer) To: [ insert name ] at [ insert address ] (you) Date: [ date ] Dear [ insert name ] We write to record the agreement between you and the Producer for your services, which will be provided under the terms and conditions detailed below. In this letter, Personal Data refers to any details about a living person that enable identification, whether directly or indirectly, notably by reference to an identifier such as a name, an identification number, location data or an online identifier, or to one or more elements specific to that individual’s physical, physiological, genetic, mental, economic, cultural or social identity. 1 Engagement 1.1 The Producer retains you and, in consideration of the Producer’s undertakings set out in paragraph 3, you agree to supply the Producer with your services as a [ specify capacity ] (Services) in connection with [ insert name of production ] (the...

1 Introduction Risk management sits at the heart of how we work, and [ insert organisation’s name ] is dedicated to embedding effective risk control across the business—every colleague has a part to play in making this happen. This policy explains: what risk is; our approach to managing risk; who holds responsibility for risk; our methods for spotting, reporting and assessing risk; our risk management policies and procedures; details of risk training; how we will monitor and refresh this. It also includes our: Risk scorecard (matrix)—see Appendix 1; and Internal risk report form—see Appendix 2. 2 What is risk? Risk is the chance of loss or another harmful or unwelcome result. It may involve financial loss, but it can also be less measurable, for example harm to reputation. We group identified...

Date: [ insert date ] 1 Introduction The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA 2023) aims to bolster the UK’s response to economic wrongdoing. It is designed to strengthen the UK’s fight against economic crime. A standout change for commercial organisations is the broadened basis on which companies can be criminally liable for misconduct by senior managers, extending corporate responsibility for their actions. 1.1 What’s the issue? Since 1971, the courts’ identification doctrine has set the test for treating a natural person’s actions and state of mind as those of a legal person. It has been the principal route for attributing criminal responsibility to corporate bodies. Under this approach, only when the ‘directing mind and will’ of a company committed the offence could liability attach to the corporate itself; in practice, this largely captured the managing director or owner when actively running the business. That standard has long been a demanding hurdle for prosecutors, which the government has now materially lowered via ECCTA 2023....