Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“What I spend on my yearly subscription, equals to a day's billable hours for me not to mention time efficiency and peace of mind.”

Jai Stern

Access all documents on Imposed decision dispute resolution processes

Imposed decision dispute resolution processes meaning

What does Imposed decision dispute resolution processes mean?
Processes in which an independent third‑party neutral hears the parties’ evidence and submissions and then imposes a decision that binds them. The term is a descriptive label in UK and Irish practice, not defined in legislation, and is also called determinative ADR, contrasted with facilitative ADR such as mediation. Key legal features are determinative authority, speed and limited grounds of challenge. Med‑arb combines mediation with arbitration; if no settlement, the arbitrator issues an award enforceable under the Arbitration Act 1996 (England & Wales and Northern Ireland), the Arbitration (Scotland) Act 2010 and Ireland’s Arbitration Act 2010. Expert determination is contractually binding on defined issues (often valuation or technical matters); challenges are typically confined to fraud, manifest error or departure from mandate. Construction adjudication is statutory under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996, the Construction Contracts (Northern Ireland) Order 1997 and Ireland’s Construction Contracts Act 2013; decisions are binding unless and until finally determined by court or arbitration, and are routinely summarily enforced. Usage is broadly consistent across England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland, though instruments and enforcement routes differ by process.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Practice Notes about Imposed decision dispute resolution processes

PRACTICE NOTES
Cross-border ADR for UK dispute resolution practitioners: arbitration, mediation and enforcement (Singapore Convention), EU Mediation Directive post-Brexit, European Code of Conduct, and construction adjudication/dispute boards

This Practice Note explores various alternative dispute resolution (ADR) options used in cross-border disputes. What is ADR? ADR denotes a collection of methods for resolving disagreements other than through the trial process. It offers a confidential means of settlement outside a court of law, whereby a dispute or difference is referred to an impartial individual or panel, either for determination or to help the parties achieve a negotiated resolution of their dispute. The process may lead to a binding outcome if the agreement by which the parties submit the dispute to ADR so provides. Note that the Commercial Court Guide and the Circuit Commercial Court Guide use the term negotiated dispute resolution (NDR), which can broadly be classified as either facilitated processes or imposed decisions. The two principal forms of ADR are arbitration and mediation. For insight into the range of ADR types available, see Practice Note: What is ADR? Arbitration The most consistently utilised ADR method in cross-border disputes is arbitration. This is a private form of...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Company Voluntary Arrangements and Litigation: Procedure, Binding Effect, Roles, Challenges and Failure (England and Wales)

This Practice Note provides an overview of company voluntary arrangements (CVAs) and their effect on legal proceedings from a dispute resolution angle. What is a CVA? A CVA is a contractual deal between a company and its creditors, serving as the corporate counterpart to an individual voluntary arrangement for individuals. The principal advantages of a CVA are: no requirement to prove insolvency, enabling steps to be taken early at the first indications of financial difficulty if the requisite majority approves—75% in value of creditors present in person or by proxy and voting on the proposal, and not opposed by more than 50% of independent creditors (ie those who are not associates)—it can be imposed on unsecured dissenting creditors; this process is known as cramdown (see Practice Note: The CVA proposal and procedure) the proposal binds creditors who are unaware of the CVA proposal/creditors' decision-making procedure The key constraint is the absence of any automatic moratorium (few companies qualified as...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
ADR in Civil Proceedings: Definitions, Main Processes, and Comparison with Litigation (England and Wales)

Definition of ADR Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is defined in the CPR Glossary as a collective label for methods of settling disputes other than through the usual trial process. Some courts adopt the term ‘negotiated dispute resolution’ (NDR) to describe resolution by alternative means; for ease, this Practice Note uses ADR. For guidance on how ADR is addressed in the various court guides, see Practice Note: ADR and NDR in the court guides. In essence, ADR is a means of resolving a dispute outside the court system. It typically involves a neutral third party who either helps the parties reach a negotiated outcome, or issues a determination of the dispute that is legally binding. A binding result can follow where the agreement to refer the dispute to ADR so provides. There are multiple forms of ADR processes. For an outline of the different types and their respective advantages and disadvantages, see Practice Note: Which form of ADR?...

Read More Right Arrow