“It really is saving us a huge number of hours over the days, weeks and months. Having more relevant support at hand, not having to draft or review documents them from scratch - it all adds up.”
Southampton FCAccess all documents on Indemnity clause
Forms of protection Trustees may limit personal liability through the following forms of protection: exoneration clauses indemnity clauses insurance statute Exoneration clauses When effective and applicable, an exoneration clause relieves a trustee from personal liability for acts or omissions that fall within its scope and wording. Trustees should seek the broadest possible drafting of any exoneration clause to maximise coverage. Exoneration clauses are interpreted strictly and read narrowly. The onus rests with trustees to demonstrate that the particular act or omission is encompassed by the clause...
Legal issues This checklist sets out the main terms and matters to bear in mind when preparing and negotiating indemnity provisions in commercial (business-to-business) contracts. For model wording with drafting notes, see Precedent: Indemnity clause-commercial contracts. For more on indemnities, consult the following Practice Notes: Indemnities in commercial contracts Guarantees and indemnities-general contract For a practical guide to reviewing an indemnity clause in B2B agreements, see Practice Note: How to review an indemnity clause. General comments What to watch out for Is an indemnity appropriate? An indemnity is a contractual promise by one party to reimburse the other for specified loss or damage or, in some instances, to relieve them from liability. Unlike a guarantee, it imposes a primary obligation that may not rely on a third party’s default. Assess if an indemnity is the right mechanism or whether a guarantee is preferable, for example where a parent company guarantees a subsidiary’s obligations. If advising the indemnifier, consider...
Any resolution of a dispute should be set out in a signed, enforceable written agreement that precisely records the parties’ terms. This reduces the prospect of later misunderstanding and allows a party to commence proceedings if the other side does not comply. As the agreement is a contract, contract law governs its drafting and interpretation, so it must be written with clarity. This Checklist highlights the key considerations of particular importance to construction disputes. For illustrative clauses and deeper analysis (including drafting notes), see Precedent: Settlement agreement for construction dispute (long form). Ensure that settlement negotiations are conducted on a without prejudice basis State expressly that settlement discussions are conducted on a ‘without prejudice’ basis so that, if talks fail, any proposed concessions cannot be relied upon by the other party in subsequent legal proceedings. Do not assume that terms such as ‘confidential’ or ‘off the record’ offer comparable protection. For further detail, see Practice Note: Without prejudice communications. Who is entering into the settlement?...
In this issue: Advertising, marketing and sponsorship Contracts Data protection International Supply chain LexTalk®Commercial: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Advertising, marketing and sponsorship ASA rulings—5 November 2025 The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) received a single complaint about advertising by On The Beach Ltd, which stated that customers booking particular holidays would be given free access to airport lounges. The ASA upheld the complaint. See: LNB News 05/11/2025 27... Contracts Ms Amlin Marine NV (on behalf of Ms Amlin Syndicate AML/2001) v King Trader Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 1387 The Court of Appeal (Civil Division) dismissed the appellants’ challenge and confirmed that a ‘pay first’ clause in a marine insurance policy was enforceable against the Charterer. The policy had been issued by MS Amlin Marine NV to Bintan Mining Corporation (the Charterer), which had chartered the vessel Solomon Trader...
Brown-Forman Beverages Europe Ltd v Bacardi UK Ltd [2021] EWHC 1259 (Comm) (19 May 2021) What are the practical implications of this case? The rule from Holme v Brunskill (1877) 3 QBD 495 provides that any material change to the contractual terms between the creditor and the principal debtor releases a guarantor. If a variation has been made, the creditor must demonstrate that the change can only operate to the surety’s advantage, or that by its very character it can never in any situation increase the surety’s exposure. Parties may exclude this rule by agreement, and prudent creditors routinely do so. It has been labelled a snare for the careless creditor. This judgment confirms two significant practical propositions concerning the rule and points to a specific hazard. First, the court reiterates that the rule is confined to guarantees and does not extend to contracts of indemnity. That offers yet another reason why those preparing instruments of suretyship should frame them as indemnities as well as guarantees. Secondly, it clarifies...
Banking & Finance—July 2025 case round-up Ciddy Ltd v Natalia [2025] EWHC 1616 (Ch) Loan agreement—unenforceable penalty clause The Chancery Division dismissed the bankruptcy petition presented by the petitioner, Anjana Natalia, against the debtor, Ms Ella Vacani. The petitioner sought to recover £657,516.32 said to arise from a loan contract, asserting that the debtor, a professional accountant, had taken legal advice before signing. The debtor, by contrast, maintained that the parties’ relationship was unfair because of unequal understanding, coercive control exerted by her husband, and an excessive default interest rate that, she said, constituted an unenforceable penalty clause. The court identified substantial grounds to challenge the petition, grounded in the debtor’s allegations of an unfair relationship under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and a penalty default term within the agreement. It held that the issues concerning default interest and unfairness were not fanciful and ought to be determined by the County Court. Accordingly, any sums due to the petitioner, if any, remain to be established in separate...
Although the trusteeship is, in theory, held for life, a trustee can step down in several ways: by relying on a clause in the trust instrument if a successor can be found, retirement may proceed under section 36 of the Trustee Act 1925 (TA 1925) by using the statutory authority in TA 1925, s 39 through the beneficiaries’ written direction under section 19 of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (TOLATA 1996) with the beneficiaries’ agreement under the rule in Saunders v Vautier by an order of the court under TA 1925, s 41 Express provision in the trust instrument that a trustee may unilaterally retire A trust instrument may confer on a trustee an express, unilateral power to retire. That said, some view such a term as encouraging a less diligent trustee to choose ‘the easy way out’. The instrument might also provide for automatic retirement once a stated age is reached. ...
This Practice Note highlights the principal points to weigh up when acting for an outgoing tenant and advising on the assignment of a rack rent (occupational) commercial lease. See also Practice Note: Transferring commercial property—a practical guide, together with the Assignment of a rack rent lease (assignor)—checklist. Is the landlord’s consent required to the assignment? Carry out the following checks in sequence, in particular: Carefully scrutinise the lease terms, together with any deeds of variation and, where necessary, any other supplemental documents. If the lease is registered and contains HM Land Registry prescribed clauses, the register will confirm whether or not the lease includes provisions that restrict or prohibit dispositions, as shown by clause LR8 of the lease. Consider whether a restriction has been entered on the title expressly barring assignment without the landlord’s consent. Where relevant, review any superior lease carefully to establish if assignment is constrained—for example, a prohibition on assigning an underlease without consent...
Intellectual property rights (IPR) can frequently become flashpoints and areas of dispute in outsourcing contract discussions and negotiations. Questions typically centre on the ownership and the licensing of rights, and also on the warranties and indemnities that each party seeks from the other concerning their authority to supply IPR (or provide access to it). This Practice Note addresses the following: Is intellectual property core to the deal? Categories of IPR in outsourcing arrangements Background IPR Foreground IPR Open source software New technologies including artificial intelligence (AI) and robotic process automation (RPA) Warranties and indemnities Handling of IPR on exit For illustrative clauses on IPR in outsourcing, refer to clause 29 in Precedent: Outsourcing agreement—long form. For a template IPR indemnity clause, see Precedents: Third party intellectual property rights indemnity clause—pro-supplier and Third party intellectual property rights indemnity clause—pro-customer. Is intellectual property core to the deal? In some outsourcing projects, the creation and ownership of...
This Agreement is entered into on [ date ] Parties [ insert name of Party A ] [ of OR a company incorporated in [ England and Wales ] under number [ insert registered number ], with its registered office at OR [ insert address ] ] (Party A); and [ insert name of Party B ] [ of OR a company incorporated in [ England and Wales ] under number [ insert registered number ], with its registered office at OR [ insert address ] ] (Party B), (each of Party A and Party B being a party and, together, Party A and Party B constitute the parties). Background Party A conducts the business of [ insert description of Party A’s business ]. Party B conducts the business of [ insert description of Party B’s business ]. Party A and Party B have agreed to [ insert description of proposed transaction ] on the terms...
1 Definitions Within this clause [ 1 ] the following meanings apply: Contaminated Land Regime • Part IIA of the Environmental Protection Act 1990, as amended from time to time, and the Statutory Guidance Contamination • the existence or build-up of any Hazardous Substances at, in, on or under the Property [ at or prior to the Completion Date ] [ at any time whether before or after the Completion Date ] Environment • any or all of the following media, namely air, land, water (including surface water and groundwater) and any living organisms (including man) or systems sustained by those media Environmental Law • all applicable laws, statutes, secondary legislation, common law, directives, regulations, codes of practice and guidance notes that have legal effect [ and are in force at the Completion Date ] in ...
1 Definitions and interpretation 1.1 Within these Conditions, the terms below shall have the following meanings: Adequate Procedures – to be interpreted in accordance with BA 2010 and the guidance issued under it; Affiliate – any entity that, directly or indirectly, Controls, is Controlled by, or is under common Control with, another entity; Applicable Law – all applicable laws, legislation, statutory instruments, regulations, and governmental guidance having binding effect, whether local or national [ or international in any relevant jurisdiction ]; Associated Person – means any or all of: (a) a party’s officers, employees, agents, subcontractors, subsidiaries, and persons Associated With that party (the Associates); and (b) persons Associated With any of the Associates, in each case engaged in performing services for or on behalf of that party, the Services and/or the Contract; Associated With – when used: (a) in clause 10 and in respect of bribery, shall be read in accordance with BA 2010 and the guidance published under it; (b)...