Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Related Glossary Terms

Glossary detail
CASE STUDY

“We rely on LexisNexis to give us a definitive answer, quickly and reliable every time so that we can be confident in the advice we use to help our clients.”

Shelter

Access all documents on Indexation allowance

Indexation allowance meaning

Published by a LexisNexis Tax expert
What does Indexation allowance mean?
An adjustment to a company’s chargeable gains computation that increases the allowable cost of an asset to reflect inflation, thereby reducing the gain subject to corporation tax. In the UK this is a statutory relief under the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992. For disposals on or after 1 January 2018, the allowance is frozen: the uplift is calculated only by reference to the Retail Prices Index up to December 2017, with no further indexation thereafter. The allowance cannot create or increase a capital loss; it can only reduce a gain to nil. In practice, it is applied when preparing corporation tax returns and in transaction due diligence for assets acquired before the freeze date. The rules apply consistently across England & Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland (corporation tax being a UK-wide tax). It is not available to UK individuals or trustees for disposals after April 1998. In Ireland, an analogous relief (commonly called indexation relief) applied for capital gains tax but was withdrawn for disposals on or after 1 January 2003; where relevant, indexation typically applies only up to 31 December 2002.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Indexation allowance

NEWS
Deputy PPFO upholds PPF’s refusal of pre‑1997 indexation; Equality Act exemption applies and post‑Brexit retained EU law arguments are time‑barred

Original news Mr H (CAS-83901-H1T3)—23 October 2023 Summary The Deputy PPFO has dismissed a complaint alleging the PPF’s reconsideration committee erred by declining to apply increases to pensions earned before 1997. Statutory PPF compensation parameters, as prescribed, are unequivocal and make no allowance for such uprating. The complaint did not fall within the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) because any purported discrimination arose under the Pensions Act 2004 (PA 2004). Moreover, no cause of action existed under retained EU law, given that the complaint was brought after the conclusion of the EU withdrawal transition period. Consequently, the challenge failed and the refusal to apply pre-1997 increases stood as decided under the legislation...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK tax weekly update: Finance Bill 2024 amendments, HMRC transfer pricing guidance, IR35 PAYE draft rules, key UT/FTT VAT, R&D and follower notice cases—1 February 2024

In this issue: Finance Bill 2024 International Companies and corporation tax Employment taxes Taxes management and litigation VAT Individuals and income tax LexTalk®Tax: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts Dates for your diary Trackers New and updated content Useful information Finance Bill 2024 Government tables amendments to Finance Bill 2024 The government has tabled changes to Finance Bill 2024 affecting R&D tax relief, the creative sector reliefs, and a new investment exemption from the electricity generator levy. These proposals are scheduled for consideration at Report Stage on 5 February 2024. For updates on the Bill’s journey through Parliament, see our Tax—Finance Bill 2024 tracker. See: LNB News 29/01/2024 11. International HMRC publishes new transfer pricing operational guidance HMRC has added operational guidance to the International Manual at INTM485025, explaining its application of the six-step approach to risk in Chapter 1 of the OECD Transfer Pricing...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Private Client briefing: probate kin inquiries, Court of Protection capacity, LLP tax and HMRC updates, avoidance cases, ECCTA, Finance Bill, charity FOI, pensions IHT, mandatory AEOI trust registration

In this issue: Probate Court of Protection UK taxes for Private Client HMRC Manuals updates Tax avoidance, evasion and non-compliance Regulatory compliance for Private Client Budgets and Finance Bills Charity and philanthropy Pensions, insurance and tax efficient investments International Question of the week Additional Private Client updates this week Daily and weekly news alerts LexTalk®Private Client: a Lexis+® community New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Useful information Probate The court’s approach to kin inquiries, genealogy and forensic DNA testing (Dorant v Dorant) In Dorant v Dorant, the court was required to identify the persons entitled to participate in an intestate estate of c.£2.75m where the deceased died unmarried, left no issue, and his parents had already died. Prior to this, the authors were unaware of any reported kin inquiry for about a century. The matter therefore offered a rare chance for the...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Indexation allowance

PRACTICE NOTES
UK pensions glossary for private client and family lawyers

Accrual rate The speed at which pension entitlement builds as pensionable service is completed within a final salary arrangement, e.g. 1/60 for each year of pensionable service. Accrued benefits Benefits relating to service built up to a given date, measured with reference to current earnings or projected future pay. A-day ‘A-day’ is the widely used term for the broad pension tax ‘simplification’ reforms that came into force on 6 April 2006. These changes followed a 2004 government policy to rationalise the British tax system as it applied to pension schemes. The objective was to cut the volume of legislation accumulated under successive administrations, folding the previous eight tax regimes into a single regime for all personal and occupational pensions. Key areas covered included: how much pension contribution was allowed; the range of schemes an individual could invest in; how much an individual could withdraw (and when); and what could be done with the remaining fund. A-Day...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Computing chargeable gains under TCGA 1992 (UK): consideration, allowable expenditure, valuation, deferred/contingent amounts, part disposals, VAT interactions and corporate indexation (frozen 2018)

Although the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 (TCGA 1992) does not prescribe a method for calculating a capital gain (termed in the statute a chargeable gain), the commonly followed method is to: take the consideration received on disposing of an asset deduct specified costs (called allowable expenditure or ‘base cost’), notably the original acquisition price of the asset, and where the taxpayer is a company and it obtained the asset on or before 31 December 2017, deduct any indexation allowance The outcome of this computation is the chargeable gain. This Practice Note offers a brief overview of consideration, allowable expenditure and (where relevant) indexation only. For the meanings of disposals and assets for capital gains tax (CGT) purposes, see the separate Practice Note: What is a capital gain? In this Practice Note CGT is used throughout as a shorthand for both CGT and corporation tax on chargeable gains. Consideration Usually the consideration is the actual sum received for the...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Equalising Guaranteed Minimum Pensions: legal obligations, Lloyds rulings, permitted methods (B, C2, D2), arrears and interest, transfers, forfeiture and limitation, tax treatment, and PPF/public sector approaches

What are guaranteed minimum pensions? Guaranteed minimum pensions (GMPs) came into being on 6 April 1978, arriving at the very moment the State Earnings-Related Pension Scheme (SERPS) was launched. The legislation in force at the time — namely the Social Security Act 1975 and the Social Security Pensions Act 1975 — allowed an employee’s employment to be contracted out of SERPS provided particular conditions were met. In essence, those conditions required the employee to be enrolled in a pension scheme that promised to pay a pension of at least a guaranteed minimum amount. That guaranteed minimum was intended to match the pension the employee would otherwise have received under SERPS. Generally, it was expected that the benefits actually payable from the relevant scheme would exceed the GMP. The principal appeal of contracting-out was that, because the state would not be required to pay SERPS as well as the individual’s basic state pension (except where, in a specific case, the GMP proved lower than the SERPS entitlement would have been),...

Read More Right Arrow