Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“Because of the pure breadth and depth of black letter law research and practical guidance that LexisNexis provides, we don't have to rely on counsel as much as perhaps firms that don't use LexisNexis.”

KaurMaxwell

Access all documents on Innocent misrepresentation

Innocent misrepresentation meaning

What does Innocent misrepresentation mean?
Innocent misrepresentation is a false statement of fact that induces a contract, made honestly and on reasonable grounds, so the maker is neither fraudulent nor negligent. In England and Wales, the Misrepresentation Act 1967 places the burden on the representor to prove they had reasonable grounds to believe, and did believe, the statement was true up to contract formation; if so, liability for negligent misrepresentation under section 2(1) does not arise and the case is treated as innocent. The primary remedy is rescission; the court may award damages in lieu of rescission under section 2(2), subject to the usual bars (affirmation, lapse of time, impossibility and protection of third-party rights). Northern Ireland applies substantially similar statutory principles. In Scotland, the concept is recognised in case law: an innocent misrepresentation (inducing error) supports reduction of the contract, but damages are generally unavailable absent delictual fault. In Ireland, the Misrepresentation Act 1967 adopts a similar scheme to England and Wales, with rescission for innocent misrepresentation and a discretion to award damages in lieu. The term commonly arises in contract law disputes, including commercial, property and sale of goods transactions.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Checklists about Innocent misrepresentation

CHECKLISTS
Misrepresentation: early claimant interview and pleading checklist—reliance, inducement, materiality versus sales puff, causation, non‑reliance clauses, pleading deceit, and anticipated defences

This Checklist It sets out the key questions and issues to raise with a prospective claimant bringing a misrepresentation claim. For guidance on what amounts to a misrepresentation claim and the essential elements required to establish one, see the following Practice Notes: Misrepresentation—what it is and similar claims Misrepresentation—what statements will establish a claim? Misrepresentation—what is inducement? Misrepresentation—falsity (fraudulent, innocent or negligent misrepresentation) Assessing the merits of a misrepresentation claim requires a detailed and thorough examination of the facts and enquiries into the pre-contract negotiations and discussions that may have taken place many years before...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Innocent misrepresentation

PRACTICE NOTES
Misrepresentation in English Contract Law: Elements, Inducement, Types, Remedies and Bars, and Exclusion/Limitation of Liability under the Misrepresentation Act 1967 and UCTA 1977

Introduction This Practice Note is part of our LLB Contract Law suite, aimed at students. In contract law, a vitiating factor is something that damages the legal validity of the consent needed for a binding agreement. One such factor is misrepresentation, where one party makes a false statement to another. This Practice Note outlines misrepresentation in English contract law, showing how inaccurate pre-contract statements undermine real consent and render contracts voidable rather than void. It sets out the elements of an actionable claim (a false statement of fact or law, inducement and attribution), separates fraudulent, negligent and innocent misrepresentation, and reviews the key cases alongside the Misrepresentation Act 1967. Particular emphasis is placed on remedies, especially rescission and damages, and on the equitable bars to rescission (affirmation, lapse of time, impossibility of restitution, third-party rights and judicial discretion). Throughout, it brings together judicial reasoning, policy considerations and exam-focused guidance, illustrating how modern case law balances fairness to the misled party with certainty in commercial transactions. Overview Definition and...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Affirmation following repudiatory or anticipatory breach and misrepresentation: principles, limits, waiver and reservation of rights (English contract law)

Affirmation signifies an intention to carry on with a contract. It may arise where there is: a repudiatory breach of contract (including anticipatory breach (renunciation)), or a misrepresentation entitling the innocent party to rescind the contract It is crucial to understand what affirmation entails and what it demands, so you are alert to the risks if a counterparty commits a repudiatory breach. A lack of understanding could result in your client failing to affirm a contract it wishes to continue, or accidentally surrendering its right to terminate by accepting a repudiatory breach. This Practice Note concentrates on affirmation in the event of repudiatory breach. For affirmation in the setting of misrepresentation, see where other remedies are available below. and repudiatory breach A repudiatory breach is a breach of contract that strikes at the very core of the agreement, empowering the innocent party to treat the contract as disregarded and to decline to be bound by its terms...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Property misrepresentation, misstatement and non-disclosure: liabilities for enquiries, remedies, exclusion clauses and disclosure duties under SCPC/SCS, UCTA 1977 and the Misrepresentation Act 1967 — England and Wales

This Practice Note examines misrepresentation, misstatement and non-disclosure in property transactions. It outlines: a seller’s potential liability for answers provided to pre-contract enquiries; the buyer’s possible remedies for non-disclosure, misrepresentation and misstatement; and contractual provisions that may protect the seller if a claim is made. What is misrepresentation? In this context, a misrepresentation is a false statement of fact by one party to another that is not a term of the contract but persuades the other to enter into it. For liability to arise, the statement must be material and actually relied upon by the other party. If a seller gives an untrue answer in replies to enquiries (or elsewhere), the buyer relies on it when deciding whether to enter into the contract and then suffers loss by entering the contract, the seller will be liable for misrepresentation. It is unnecessary to prove the misrepresentation was the only matter relied upon; liability may arise even where the misinformation formed just...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about Innocent misrepresentation

PRECEDENTS
Precedent CPR Pre-Action letter of claim following rescission for misrepresentation (fraudulent, negligent or innocent) — England and Wales

[ ON THE HEADED NOTEPAPER OF CLAIMANT’S SOLICITORS ] Our ref: [ insert your file reference for this matter ] FAO [ RELEVANT NAME ] [ NAME OF DEFENDANT OR DEFENDANT’S SOLICITOR, IF KNOWN ][ ADDRESS LINE 1 ][ ADDRESS LINE 2 ][ POSTCODE ] [ DATE ] Dear [ insert name ] Re [ PROSPECTIVE CLAIMANT’S NAME ] AND [ PROSPECTIVE DEFENDANT’S NAME ] LETTER OF CLAIM Further to our correspondence dated [ insert date of previous correspondence, if any ], we now write in this matter. As you are aware, we are instructed by [ insert client’s full name ], of [ insert full address ]. This is our client’s letter of claim, issued in compliance with the Civil Procedure Rules’ Practice Direction – Pre-Action Conduct and Protocols (the Practice Direction). For your convenience, a copy is enclosed. Please note the concluding section of this letter, which sets out the deadline for your response and the consequences should...

Read More Right Arrow