Insolvency set-off meaning

ARCHIVED: This Practice Note is archived and is no longer maintained. A bank loan is treated as a non-performing loan (NPL) if more than 90 days pass without the borrower making the agreed instalments or interest payments. Banks experienced an accumulation of NPLs in their books when borrowers' inability to repay was intensified by the financial crisis and subsequent recessions. When NPLs are proportionately high, banks' capacity to manage the riskiness of their lending is diminished. NPLs are a supervisory priority for the European Central Bank (ECB), which monitors the overall level of NPLs across euro area banks. Under the supervisory review and evaluation process (SREP), the ECB assesses whether individual banks adequately manage loan risk and whether they have suitable strategies, governance arrangements and processes in place. The ECB also regularly undertakes co-ordinated exercises to review the asset quality of the banks it directly supervises—it works with national supervisors to establish a consistent and effective approach to tackling and reducing bad loans, drawing on best practices as set...

This Checklist sets out the matters a landlord ought to weigh up where a tenant faces insolvency, highlighting the options open to the landlord, such as Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery (CRAR), forfeiture, drawing on a rent deposit, and pursuing former tenants, guarantors and sub-tenants. It further addresses practical considerations for the landlord, including steps for securing and marketing the property, and contacting the insolvency practitioner. What type of insolvency scenario applies to the tenant? The remedies that can be exercised, and the limits that will bite, differ depending on the particular insolvency arrangement affecting the tenant. Each procedure brings distinct constraints and options. For a table summarising the restrictions, see Practice Note: Quick guide to landlord’s remedies in tenant insolvency. Has contact been made with the insolvency practitioner? It is vital to liaise with the relevant insolvency practitioner to assess the tenant’s position and to evaluate what, if any, prospect exists of outstanding sums being repaid, future rents being protected, or the tenant emerging from the...

This Checklist highlights the principal points and potential pitfalls to address when preparing and agreeing a payment clause in a business to business contract, covering late payment as well. For a model clause, see Precedent: Payment clause-commercial contracts. Guidance on late payment is in Practice Notes: Penalty interest rates in commercial contracts and Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998, including, in particular, the sections on: Contracts, organisations and debts subject to LPCD(I)A 1998 Calculating the statutory interest Express terms for late payment in place of statutory interest Meaning of 'grossly unfair' Price and payment terms in a contract are often closely linked. When using this checklist, also refer to: Drafting and negotiating a price clause-checklist. Legal issues, general comments and what to watch out for are noted. Late payment legislation The Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998 (LPCD(I)A 1998) allows all businesses and public sector bodies to claim statutory interest on late payment of commercial...

This Flowchart sets out the conditions that must be satisfied for a floating charge to be avoided. This flowchart outlines the criteria that must be met to have a floating charge set aside successfully...

In this issue Criminal procedure and evidence Appeal and judicial review Bribery, corruption, sanctions and export controls Consumer protection and cartels Environmental offences Food safety and hygiene offences Fraud, forgery, tax and theft offences Health and safety and corporate manslaughter offences Local authority prosecutions International Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Useful information Criminal procedure and evidence Challenging the decision not to prosecute (R (on the application of Hillary Smith) v DPP) The High Court’s judgment in R (on the application of Hillary Smith) v Director of Public Prosecutions delivers notable guidance on three fronts: the weight to be attached to inquest conclusions when the Crown Prosecution Service’s (CPS) decides whether or not to bring a prosecution; the position the courts are likely to take in judicial review proceedings when scrutinising the reasonableness of the CPS’s application of the two-stage...

Pagden (as liquidator of Core VCT IV Plc and Core VCT V plc) and others v Fry and other cases [2025] EWHC 2316 (Ch) What are the practical implications of this case? This decision clarifies that, although liquidators’ firms and their personnel may, in certain circumstances, invoke limitation clauses in relation to distinct contractual or tortious duties (always subject to the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 and fact-specific questions of vicarious liability), individual liquidators cannot restrict the statutory obligations that arise under a statutory trust. Sensible practice is for liquidators and their firms to revisit engagement letters to (a) set out, with precision, the separation between liquidators’ statutory functions and any contractual or advisory services; and (b) add explicit carve-outs confirming that limitation provisions have no application to the liquidators’ statutory duties. What was the background? The claimants are three companies that issued proceedings against their former liquidators and the firm of those former office-holders (the defendants). They contend the defendants breached fiduciary, tortious and contractual...

Webb and another (in their capacity as joint liquidators of Eversholt Rail (365) Ltd (in liquidation)) v Eversholt Rail Ltd and another company [2024] EWHC 2217 (Ch) What are the practical implications of this case? This case serves as a reminder to insolvency practitioners that orders under IA 1986, s 235 and IA 1986, s 236 are not automatic; a cogent justification is needed explaining why specified documents are reasonably required. Requests should be tightly focused in both timeframe and in the categories or classes of documents sought. The judge criticised not only the lack of specificity in the evidence, but also the failure to explain that lack. As the court has a broad discretion and will weigh a range of considerations, a request that is relatively unfocused may still be granted if there is a satisfactory reason it cannot be more precise, for example a complete lack of co-operation from the other side. What was the background? This application was made in relation to Eversholt...

This Practice Note sets out the principal tax considerations where creditors move to enforce security over the assets of a distressed company or corporate group. Related Practice Notes in this series address tax issues concerning: acquisitions of distressed debt, and debt restructurings (ie waivers, debt/equity swaps or renegotiations) In addition, Tax and distressed debt—checklist of points to consider distils the main tax points to bear in mind when dealing with distressed debt in general. This Practice Note reviews the enforcement routes open to creditors of troubled businesses and the consequences that may follow. For a detailed look at the loan relationships provisions on debt releases, see: Loan relationships—impairment and debt releases Loan relationships—impairment and debt releases: connected companies Types of enforcement As explained in Practice Note: Tax and distressed debt—debt restructurings, lenders will frequently engage in a restructuring of a distressed group’s debt to help the underlying business continue. Enforcing security over a borrower’s assets...

The Pensions Regulator (the Regulator) The Regulator is an arm’s-length public body set up under the Pensions Act 2004 (PeA 2004). Its authority to impose contribution notices and financial support directions appears in PeA 2004, ss 38–50. Although the Act does not use the label, these provisions are widely known as the Regulator’s ‘moral hazard’ powers. Their purpose is to counter the ‘moral hazard’ arising from the Pension Protection Fund (PPF): the possibility that corporate groups might organise their structures so as to heighten exposure within their pension schemes, comfortable that the PPF would intervene if the employer entered insolvency. The principal moral hazard tools—and the only ones exercised so far—are the power to issue a contribution notice (CN) and the power to issue a financial support direction (FSD). A CN compels the recipient to pay a specified amount into a defined benefit occupational pension scheme. A CN can be issued where the criteria in PeA 2004, s 38 are satisfied. These mechanisms exist to deter behaviour that would...

Yunneng Wind Power Co. Limited successfully sought a Part 26A restructuring plan (RP), with the convening hearing in July 2023 and the sanction hearing in August 2023. The key points are set out below. Capitalised terms not defined here take the meanings assigned in the convening and sanction judgments. This Deal Debrief forms part of the Restructuring plans collection. For a fuller review of core metrics from RPs lodged in 2023, alongside commentary from leading figures in the restructuring sphere, see Practice Note: Market Insights Trend Report—trends in Part 26A restructuring plans in 2023 [Archived]. Name of plan company Yunneng Wind Power Co....

This deed is dated the [ INSERT DAY ] of [ INSERT MONTH AND YEAR ]. Parties The persons whose particulars are set out in the Schedule (the Indemnifiers); and [ Insert names of the Joint Liquidators ] of [ insert name and address of the Joint Liquidators’ firm ] (the Joint Liquidators) BACKGROUND [ Insert name of the company ] (the Company) was incorporated in England and Wales under company number [ insert number ]. [ Insert names of the joint liquidators ] are to be appointed as Joint Liquidators of the Company (the Appointment) by the members via written resolution. In consideration of the Joint Liquidators accepting the Appointment, the Indemnifiers agree to indemnify the Joint Liquidators, together with the members and employees of the Joint Liquidators’ firm, in the manner set out herein...

The Contract comprises the completed Standard Building Contract Without Quantities for use in Scotland 2016 published by the SBCC subject to the following amendments: Recitals and Articles updated: contractor to provide a master programme and Schedule of Information Requirements; CDP responsibility accepted; Principal Contractor duties priced; arbitration deleted; Schedule of Amendments prevails; Third Party Agreements duties. Contract Particulars: arbitration entries removed; Rectification Period set at 12 months; fluctuations and certain PII/guarantee entries deleted. Conditions: key definitions revised (Practical Completion, Copyright Material, Design sub‑contractors, Funder, Site); Scottish jurisdiction; approvals mean principles only; entire agreement; variations in writing. Design/materials/programming: contractor accepts ER/CP; quality and non‑deleterious materials; programme reporting; site risk; drawings/info supply; tighter discrepancy notices. Time/defects: mitigate and advise on delay; narrower Relevant Events; Practical Completion clarified; stronger rectification, consequential damage and indemnity; phased as‑built/occupation information. IP/confidentiality/BIM: broader licence, moral rights waivers and delivery; confidentiality reinforced; BIM where adopted. Management/sub‑contracting: access, approved Site Manager, meetings; prescribed sub‑contracts; collateral warranties/third‑party rights; CDM duties; insurance...

This Agreement is dated [ insert day and month ] 20[ insert year ] Parties The Consenting Lenders (as set out in Schedule 1); [ The Consenting Bondholders (as set out in Schedule 2); ] [ insert name of debtor company ], a company registered in [ insert country eg England and Wales ] with company number [ insert registered number ], whose registered office is at [ insert address ]; [ The Material Companies (as set out in Schedule 3); ] Recitals On [ insert date ], the directors of the Company announced a proposal to restructure the claims of certain creditors of the [ Company OR Group ] following a period of financial distress. On [ insert date ], the Company and certain creditors entered into a Standstill Agreement in connection with the proposed restructuring. [ On [ insert date ], the Company and certain creditors agreed non-binding heads of terms for the...

In this Q&A, we assume that B’s claim is smaller than A’s. Legal process against the company Under paragraph 43(2) of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986), the moratorium prevents any legal process—covering legal proceedings, execution, distress and diligence—from being started or continued against the company or its property without the administrator’s consent or the court’s permission. This wording is wide enough to encompass any remaining actions or steps that might otherwise be taken against the company or its property. Accordingly, B can only bring an action against A with the approval of the administrator or the leave of the court. The purpose of the moratorium (and the interim moratorium) is to safeguard the company and its assets from creditor action during the company’s administration and the pre-appointment period. It bars any steps, actions or processes from being begun or carried on against the company and its property, save with the administrator’s consent (if one is appointed) or the court’s permission. See Practice...

The provisions relating to notices of sums in arrear (NOSIAs) Sections 86B–86D of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA 1974) set out the rules on notices of sums in arrear (NOSIAs). CCA 1974, s 86B deals with NOSIAs for fixed-sum credit agreements, etc, and CCA 1974, s 86C deals with NOSIAs for running-account credit agreements...

Do the normal set-off rules apply to an LLP in administration? The Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 (LLPA 2000) created limited liability partnerships (LLPs) and is intended to be considered alongside the Limited Liability Partnership Regulations 2001 (LLPR 2001), SI 2001/1090. Through these Regulations, the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) and the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016 (IR 2016), SI 2016/1024 are applied to LLPs accordingly...