“LexisNexis is great as I can find the answers I am looking for really quickly. I believe that nothing should be more than 6 clicks away - and the products from LexisNexis deliver on this standard”
AvensureAccess all documents on Issue (offspring)
Marcus v Marcus [2025] EWHC 1695 (Ch) What was the background? Stuart Marcus, a successful toy manufacturer, established a discretionary trust in 2003 for his ‘children and remoter issue’ and their spouses. At the time, he believed he had two biological children, Edward and Jonathan. Unbeknown to him, Edward may have been conceived during an affair Patricia, his wife, had within the marriage. The truth emerged in 2010 when Patricia told Edward that Stuart was not his biological father. That information was withheld from Stuart until his death in 2020, and Jonathan likewise remained unaware until he was told in 2023. After learning this, Jonathan commenced proceedings to exclude Edward from the trust, contending that he did not fall within the defined class of beneficiaries. In the first instance ruling (Marcus v Marcus [2025] 2 All ER 446; [2024] EWHC 2086 (Ch)), Master Marsh determined that Edward was not Stuart’s biological child. He further concluded that the word ‘children’ should be construed more widely than biological offspring alone so...