Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“LexisNexis is great as I can find the answers I am looking for really quickly. I believe that nothing should be more than 6 clicks away - and the products from LexisNexis deliver on this standard”

Avensure

Access all documents on JCT

JCT meaning

What does JCT mean?
JCT refers, in practice, to the Joint Contracts Tribunal and its suite of standard-form construction contracts used to procure building works and services. It is an industry shorthand rather than a term defined in legislation or case law. The JCT suite (including Design and Build, Standard Building Contract, Intermediate, Minor Works, term and framework contracts, sub-contracts and collateral warranties) provides a structured allocation of risk and clear provisions on design responsibility, payment and retention, variations, extensions of time, liquidated damages, loss and expense, insurance, termination and dispute resolution (including adjudication under the UK “Construction Act”). Usage varies by jurisdiction: - England and Wales: JCT contracts are widely adopted in private and some public sector projects. - Scotland: Scottish Building Contracts Committee (SBCC) publishes Scottish versions adapted to Scots law; these mirror JCT structure. - Northern Ireland: JCT forms are commonly used with local amendments and operate alongside the Construction Contracts (Northern Ireland) Order 1997. - Ireland: JCT is less common; RIAI and Public Works (GCCC) contracts predominate. Where used, JCT is often governed by English law and amended for Irish legislation. Editions include JCT 2016 and JCT 2024; always specify the exact form and edition when drafting or negotiating.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Checklists about JCT

CHECKLISTS
PPC 2000 project procurement structure diagram—distinct from JCT Constructing Excellence and NEC3 Partnering Option X12

This illustration depicts the framework of a project procured via PPC 2000...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
JCT 2024 Intermediate: practical checklist for completing Agreement, Recitals, Articles and Contract Particulars (with or without contractor’s design)

Within a JCT contract, the Agreement, Recitals, Articles and Contract Particulars at the outset record the project-specific particulars of the works to be undertaken. It is crucial these sections are completed in full and accurately, to prevent uncertainty and disagreements over the scope. This Checklist offers practical steps for filling in those particulars, with links to pertinent Practice Notes that explain each area in depth. It is intended for users who are relatively new to JCT contracting. Commonly, an employer asks the architect/contract administrator or another consultant to draft the particulars at the outset, then has its lawyer review the contract prior to execution. Alternatively, a lawyer may complete all entries, but will require the client’s or consultants’ input on the information to include. The Checklist can serve as a reference when preparing or verifying the particulars. Accurate completion from the outset reduces ambiguity about what is required and helps prevent disputes. It also serves as reference when checking particulars. Guidance here shows how to complete required information, supported by...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
Practical checklist for terminating construction contracts: grounds (contractual/common law), insolvency restrictions, notice requirements, step-in rights, consequences and post-termination actions

This Checklist outlines the key matters to weigh up both prior to and following a decision to bring a building contract to an end, or any agreement connected to a construction project. Comprehensive guidance and detail on ending contracts is available in the Termination and suspension in construction contracts subtopic. Considerations when deciding whether to terminate A party contemplating steps to terminate a construction contract should reflect on the following: What grounds are relied upon for ending the contract? Review the building contract closely. Does it include explicit provisions on termination, identifying particular events that allow the parties to terminate? Many UK building contracts contain express termination rights (see Practice Notes: JCT contracts—termination, NEC contracts—termination, FIDIC contracts 2017—termination by the Employer, FIDIC contracts 2017—termination by the Contractor, FIDIC contracts (pre-2017 editions)—termination by the Employer and FIDIC forms of contract (pre-2017 editions)—termination by the Contractor). If there are contractual grounds for termination, what are they, and do they apply to the circumstances?

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Flowcharts about JCT

FLOWCHARTS
Defects under JCT Standard Building and Design and Build Contracts 2024/2016: Pre-Practical Completion, Rectification and Post-Rectification Flowchart

This flowchart takes you through the stages of a CIETAC arbitration under the CIETAC Arbitration Rules 2024 Although each arbitration differs and the tribunal will tailor proceedings to specifics of the case, it remains vital to appreciate how an arbitration will 'usually' progress, together with the timescales likely to apply...

Read More Right Arrow
FLOWCHARTS
Final payment procedure under the JCT Standard Building Contract 2016—flowchart covering With Quantities, Without Quantities and With Approximate Quantities

This Flowchart This Flowchart outlines the key questions to consider when assessing the territorial reach or scope of statutory employment rights—specifically, which statutory rights, if any, apply to an employee who works abroad and/or has a foreign employer. For general guidance on territorial application or scope, see Practice Note: The territorial scope of statutory employment rights. For Flowcharts that address applicable law and jurisdiction, refer to Determining applicable law in employment disputes—flowchart and Determining jurisdiction in employment disputes (1 January 2021 onwards)—flowchart...

Read More Right Arrow
FLOWCHARTS
Archived flowchart: JCT Design and Build 2011 Alternative A stage payments - interim payment process prior to practical completion

This Checklist is intended for situations where: a leasehold property is being purchased and the tenant (or a predecessor in title) entered into an agreement for lease prior to completion of the lease; or a reversionary interest is being bought and the reversioner (or a predecessor in title) entered into an agreement for lease before completion of an existing occupational lease, or an agreement for lease remains in place pending completion of a lease. In each case, the agreement for lease predates completion of the relevant lease. You should confirm whether any outstanding or continuing obligations in the agreement for lease (eg to rectify defects or undertake works) will bind the purchaser. Any surviving obligations that bind successors in title could adversely affect the property’s investment value. Note that this Checklist is not comprehensive and, depending on the nature of the transaction, other issues may arise from the agreement for lease and require consideration. This Checklist also does not address limitation periods...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related News about JCT

NEWS
Weekly construction law update: JCT termination decision, CLLS LoI 2024, Welsh BSA handbook, Scottish SBA Specification, expert replaced after solicitor interference, RIBA/CLC trends, JCT 2024 and BSA finance guidance

In this issue: Standard form contracts Building safety Expert witnesses Construction industry news Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Construction trackers Standard form contracts CLLS publishes 2024 edition of Letter of Intent The CLLS has released the refreshed 2024 edition of its Letter of Intent. Our commentary reviews the revisions made. See News Analysis: City of London Law Society publishes 2024 edition of Letter of Intent. Court refuses declaratory relief in JCT termination payment dispute (Shaylor v Valesecure) In Shaylor Group Ltd (in administration) v Valesecure Property Ltd (in liquidation) [2024] EWHC 750 (TCC), the Technology and Construction Court declined to issue declarations regarding the contractor’s right to payment after the termination of a JCT-based contract. In doing so, the court explored noteworthy issues of contractual interpretation, including the methodology for assessing sums owed to the contractor post-termination and the impact of an ineffective assignment by the employer. See News Analysis:...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Construction law and industry update: notification clauses (Drax), PFI/PF2 adverse weather costs (Pevensey), CLC output, RICS housing and land manifestos, JCT 2024 forms, trackers—20 June 2024

In this issue: Contract law PFI/PF2 contracts Construction industry news Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Construction trackers Contract law Compliance with a notification clause—does the other side know enough? (Drax v Scottish Power) In Drax Smart Generation Holdco Ltd v Scottish Power Retail Holdings Ltd [2024] EWCA Civ 477, the Court of Appeal examined the contractual rules on notices of claim. These notification provisions are commonplace in share purchase agreements and, with growing regularity, in other forms of agreement. In essence, such clauses state that, before one party can bring a claim against the other, the claimant must first serve a notice of that claim on the counterparty. Non-compliance with the notification clause can render the claim unenforceable and expose it to being struck out and/or summarily dismissed. What, then, amounts to compliance? In this matter, the Court of Appeal indicated that it is sufficient if the recipient is provided with enough information...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Construction law weekly update: Fire safety reforms (Approved Document B), Welsh combustible ban extension, JCT termination appeal, planning capacity survey, plus new precedents and practice notes

In this issue Construction industry news Fire safety Standard form construction contracts Planning for construction lawyers Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content New Q&As Construction industry news In this article, we reflect on the principal shifts in construction law that surfaced during the closing months of 2024, and consider what might unfold in 2025. See News Analysis: Construction law—key developments in 2024, and what to expect in 2025. Fire safety The MHCLG has issued revised editions of Approved Document B (fire safety) for both volume 1 (dwellings) and volume 2 (buildings other than dwellings). These updates consolidate the 2019 editions together with the 2020 and 2022 amendments, and also include upcoming changes planned for 2025, 2026 and 2029...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about JCT

PRACTICE NOTES
Project bank accounts—UK standard forms compared: JCT 2024/SBCC PBA suite, NEC3/NEC4 Y(UK)1, and PPC2000 provisions on trust arrangements, joining agreements and payment mechanics

What standard forms are available? While take-up in the private sector is still modest, the government advocates the use of project bank accounts on public sector construction schemes. See Practice Note: Introduction to project bank accounts. In light of this, JCT, NEC and PPC2000 have each released standard form documentation. This Practice Note examines their respective approaches and the stand-out characteristics of these documents/clauses. JCT JCT first launched its Project Bank Account Documentation in 2010. It was reissued within the JCT 2011, 2016 and 2024 suites, with no material textual alterations. The 2011 edition contained a consultation exercise report; in the 2016 and 2024 editions this was superseded by guidance notes. A Scottish edition was brought out by the SBCC in February 2023. These publications reflect continuity of content across the successive suites and editions over time. The 2024 materials are intended to facilitate establishment of a project bank account, and consist of three components: Project Bank Account Agreement (PBA) JCT Joining Agreement...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
JCT 2024 contracts: suite-wide amendments, publication schedule, legislative updates and the new Target Cost family

Practice Note This Practice Note consolidates our content on the amendments as introduced in the 2024 editions of the Joint Contracts Tribunal (JCT) standard form construction contracts...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Insurance under JCT Design and Build and Standard Building Contracts 2024: liabilities, Options A–C, Specified Perils and Excepted Risks, PII, terrorism cover, claims and reinstatement

This Practice Note looks at the insurance provisions in the main forms of JCT contract. It examines the Contractor’s liabilities and insurance obligations under the JCT Design and Build Contract (DB) 2024 and the JCT Standard Building Contract (SBC) 2024. Where clause numbering differs between the two forms, this Practice Note draws attention to it; otherwise, clause references apply to both DB and SBC. The 2024 and 2016 editions made adjustments to the insurance provisions compared with the 2011 editions, including updates to professional indemnity insurance in the 2024 version and, in 2016, relocating much of the text from Schedule 3 into the main conditions and introducing the C.1 Replacement Schedule, see Practice Note: JCT contracts 2016—what's changed? [Archived] and News Analysis: The JCT Design and Build Contract 2024—what’s changed? For how insurance and risks are addressed in the NEC3/NEC4 Engineering and Construction Contract, see Practice Note: NEC contracts—insurance. For FIDIC contracts, see Practice Notes: FIDIC contracts 2017—insurance and FIDIC contracts (pre-2017 editions)—insurance. This Practice Note considers the JCT...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about JCT

PRECEDENTS
Scott Schedule for Construction Variation Claims: Template and Examples, with JCT Guidance on Valuation, Loss and Expense, Separation from extension of time and prolongation, and Avoiding Double Recovery

Variations can also push back the completion date, and may give the Claimant a right to extra time and to prolongation costs. These elements of a variation claim are commonly pursued separately, as an extension of time claim and a prolongation costs claim. By way of illustration, the principal JCT forms provide distinct procedures: one for pricing the changed work, and another for evaluating loss and expense arising from the variation’s effect on the progress of the works (see Practice Note: JCT contracts—variations — Valuing variations under JCT contracts). Accordingly, Claimants should take care not to ‘double dip’ across the separate elements of the claims. No. Description of Variation Claimant’s case Defendant’s response Judge/Tribunal comments The Claimant intended to adopt slab foundations for block A, as depicted on the Claimant’s drawing reference XX dated XX. By email dated XX, the Defendant directed the use of piled foundations for block A...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Precedent JCT Standard Building Sub-Contract 2024: Agreement, Particulars and Amendments (Procurement Act 2023, Building Safety/HRB, BIM, Bonds, Warranties) — England and Wales

Agreement concerning [ insert brief details of the works/project ] at [ insert address of works ] (incorporating, among other things, the JCT Standard Building Sub-Contract Agreement 2024 (SBCSub/A 2024) and the JCT Standard Building Sub-Contract Conditions 2024 (SBCSub/C 2024), each as amended and supplemented as set out in this Agreement and in the Schedules to it). This Agreement is dated the [ insert number ] day of [ insert month ] 20[ insert year ] Parties [ insert name of the Contractor ] (company registration number [ insert number ]), whose registered office is at [ insert address of the Contractor ] (“the Contractor”) [ insert name of the Sub-Contractor ] (company registration number [ insert number ]), whose registered office is at [ insert address of the Sub-Contractor ] (“the Sub-Contractor”) Now it is agreed that: 1 Interpretation In this Agreement, words and expressions carry the meanings respectively attributed to them in the JCT SBCSub/A 2024 and...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Schedule of Employer‑Favouring Amendments to JCT SBC/AQ 2016 (England): Building Safety Act/HRB, Dutyholder and CDM compliance; design liability; collateral warranties; insurance; payment; insolvency; adjudication (arbitration removed)

The Contract comprises the completed Standard Building Contract With Approximate Quantities 2016 published by the JCT subject to the following amendments: This Contract adopts JCT SBC/AQ 2016 with extensive modifications to reflect design responsibility, building safety and commercial controls. Recitals: Contractor to provide a master programme and Schedule of Information Requirements; confirms site due diligence and accepts full CDP design liability. Articles: Dutyholder Regulations added; Tender Price covers Principal Contractor duties; arbitration removed; Schedule of Amendments prevails; strict protection of Third Party Agreements. Definitions/governance: new and revised terms (Building Safety Regulator, HRB, Practical Completion, Copyright Material, Design Sub‑contractors, Dutyholder Regulations); several deletions; English court jurisdiction. Design/materials/information: skill‑and‑care design and coordination; only new, compliant, non‑deleterious materials; golden thread storage; monthly programme reporting; site risks at Contractor’s risk. Procedures/controls: tighter instruction, testing, defects and as‑built duties; enhanced confidentiality and IP licences; HRB assistance; CDM/Dutyholder competency confirmations. Sub‑contracting/rights: prescribed sub‑contracts, insurances and delivery of collateral warranties/third‑party rights; limits on assignment. Payment/commercial: 28‑day final...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Q&As about JCT

Q&As
Utility coordinator and Statutory Undertakers: JCT DB 2.26.6

If an employer appoints a utility co-ordinator to supervise and arrange utility connections with Statutory Undertakers, would this alter status of Statutory Undertakers, as set out in clause 2.26.6 of JCT Design & Build Contract?...

Read More Right Arrow
Q&As
Case law on JCT SBC 2011 clause 2.27.1 compliance

Clause 2.27.1 of the JCT Standard Building Contract 2011 (SBC) Clause 2.27.1 provides that where it becomes reasonably clear that progress of the Works, or any Section, is delayed or likely to be delayed, the Contractor must at once notify the Architect/Contract Administrator, explaining the material circumstances, including the reasons for the delay, and in that notice point out any occurrence he regards as a Relevant Event... Lexis+® UK practical point: the same wording appears in the Standard Building Contract 2016 (cl 2.27.1) and in the JCT Design and Build Contract 2011/2016 (cl 2.24.1), save that in the design and build forms the addressee ‘Architect/Contract Administrator’ is replaced by the ‘Employer’... Two principal questions arise when deciding whether a notification clause such as SBC clause 2.27.1 has been properly observed: what does the obligation to give notice ‘forthwith’ encompass, and is the contractor obliged to meet this condition? what level of notification/particulars of the ‘material circumstances’ must be provided? ...

Read More Right Arrow