Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“Although cost was an important factor, our relationship with LexisNexis, their responsiveness, flexibility, and the integration available with other products were key factors.”

Irwin Mitchell

Access all documents on KA-CARE

KA-CARE meaning

Published by a LexisNexis Energy expert
What does KA-CARE mean?
In legal practice, KA-CARE means King Abdullah City for Atomic and Renewable Energy, a Saudi Arabian government institution associated with the Kingdom’s civil nuclear and renewable energy programmes. UK and Irish lawyers most often encounter it as a state counterparty or stakeholder in Saudi energy projects, memoranda of understanding, procurement processes, technology transfer, and international cooperation documents, and in due diligence, sanctions and export control screening. Established by Royal Order in Saudi Arabia, KA-CARE was long treated as the lead institution for the Saudi nuclear programme. Following government reorganisations, renewable policy and project procurement are now led primarily by the Ministry of Energy (including the Renewable Energy Project Development Office), while nuclear and radiological regulation is exercised by the Saudi Nuclear and Radiological Regulatory Commission. KA-CARE’s current focus is on strategy, programme development and coordination (including aspects of the nuclear fuel cycle and uranium resources). It is not the nuclear safety regulator. This is not a term defined in UK or Irish legislation or case law; it is a descriptive expression used in international energy, projects and trade controls practice. Usage is consistent across England and Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland. When contracting, confirm the correct Saudi entity, authority to contract,...
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Checklists about KA-CARE

CHECKLISTS
Tenant insolvency: practical checklist for commercial landlords—CRAR, forfeiture, rent deposits, guarantors/former tenants (s17), undertenant recovery, disclaimer, administration expenses, and securing/marketing premises (England and Wales)

This Checklist sets out the matters a landlord ought to weigh up where a tenant faces insolvency, highlighting the options open to the landlord, such as Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery (CRAR), forfeiture, drawing on a rent deposit, and pursuing former tenants, guarantors and sub-tenants. It further addresses practical considerations for the landlord, including steps for securing and marketing the property, and contacting the insolvency practitioner. What type of insolvency scenario applies to the tenant? The remedies that can be exercised, and the limits that will bite, differ depending on the particular insolvency arrangement affecting the tenant. Each procedure brings distinct constraints and options. For a table summarising the restrictions, see Practice Note: Quick guide to landlord’s remedies in tenant insolvency. Has contact been made with the insolvency practitioner? It is vital to liaise with the relevant insolvency practitioner to assess the tenant’s position and to evaluate what, if any, prospect exists of outstanding sums being repaid, future rents being protected, or the tenant emerging from the...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
PSR 2023 Competitive Process: Transparency Checklist for Notices of Intention to Award Contracts or Conclude Framework Agreements (UK Central Digital Platform; SI 2023/1348 reg 11(10) Sch 10)

Checklist This Checklist outlines the details that must appear in a notice of intention of intention to make an award, or to finalise a framework agreement, with the Chosen Provider through the Competitive Process, intended for submission to the UK central digital platform, to satisfy the transparency requirements set and mandated by the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023 (PSR Regs 2023), SI 2023/1348, reg 11(10), Sch 10...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
Provider Selection Regime 2023: Checklist for Notice of Intention to Award to an Existing Provider using Direct Award Process C (health care services), for UK central digital platform submission

This Checklist This Checklist explains the particulars that must appear in a notice to be submitted to the UK central digital platform to satisfy the applicable transparency duties imposed by the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023 (PSR Regs 2023), SI 2023/1348, reg 9(4), Sch 3, following the direct award made of a health care contract under Direct Award Process C...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Flowcharts about KA-CARE

FLOWCHARTS
Law firm internal complaints procedure: quick-reference flowchart of process and timescales

This Flowchart provides an overview of a UK design infringement action. The right invoked may arise from any of the UK design rights that sit alongside one another: UK registered designs (including re-registered designs) UK unregistered designs (sometimes referred to as ‘design right’) supplementary unregistered designs For added guidance on these rights, see the Practice Note: UK registered and unregistered designs...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related News about KA-CARE

NEWS
English Commercial Court refuses permission to amend to add s 67 BIT challenge as time-barred under AA 1996 s 73; nationality arguable but for lack of reasonable diligence.

The Czech Republic v Diag Human SE and another [2024] EWHC 708 (Comm) What are the practical implications of this case? The judgment offers practical guidance on how the ‘reasonable diligence’ condition in AA 1996, s 73(1) operates. It warns parties in arbitration to remain vigilant to unfolding factual matters that may demand further enquiry, in order to satisfy the ‘reasonable diligence’ requirement and maintain an arguable case that is not rendered time-barred under AA 1996, s 73(1). It also emphasises the elevated duty of care owed by investment arbitration practitioners when advising clients in arbitral proceedings, so as to avoid claims of insufficient diligence in the conduct of jurisdictional challenges before the tribunal. What was the background? ...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK employment law weekly highlights: 28 March 2024—April reforms, flexible working Code, National Insurance cuts, minimum wage, Vento bands, industrial action, Northern Ireland updates

In this issue Working time and flexible working Pay Tax Prohibited conduct (discrimination etc) Employment tribunal equality claims Diversity and gender pay gap Industrial action Unfair dismissal Employment tribunals Immigration Northern Ireland ESG and sustainability: employment issues Daily and weekly news alerts Dates for your diary Trackers New Q&As Working time and flexible working Code of Practice (Requests for Flexible Working) Order 2024 (SI 2024/429): The Order designates 6 April 2024 as the date on which the updated Code of Practice on handling requests for flexible working, issued by the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (Acas) under section 199 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (TULR(C)A 1992), takes effect. It also clarifies that the revised Code does not cover applications for flexible working made under section 80F of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996) that are lodged on or before 5 April 2024;...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Employment law weekly: ERA 2025 implementation, Welsh SCNB consultation, ET/EAT rule changes, EHRC single-sex guidance upheld, Guy Carpenter team move, HMRC car rates, EU CSRD/CS3D scope narrowed

In this issue: Employment Rights Act 2025 Benefits Protected characteristics Confidentiality, duties and restrictions: enforcement Europe-EU New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Employment resources on Lexis+® LexTalk®Employment: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts Employment Rights Act 2025 Welsh Government consults on establishment of a Social Care Negotiating Body The Welsh Government has opened a consultation on creating a Social Care Negotiating Body (SCNB) using powers in the Employment Rights Act 2025 (ERA 2025). The SCNB would be responsible for setting Fair Pay Agreements for Wales’s social care workforce. Feedback is invited on the organisation’s design, role and anticipated effects. Responses will inform the government’s understanding of sector perspectives on the SCNB, including the bargaining approach, who and what it should cover, dispute resolution, roll-out, as well as compliance and enforcement. The consultation closes on 28 April 2026. The exercise does not invite comments on the specifics...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about KA-CARE

PRACTICE NOTES
Parental responsibility under the Children Act 1989: definition, scope, case law and key issues (education, religion, medical consent, surnames, contact, relocation, passports, adoption, guardianship) in England and Wales

This Practice Note outlines the concept of parental responsibility for children under section 3 of the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989). It describes what sits within the scope of parental responsibility and how the courts have read this concept in connection with matters such as education, religious upbringing, consent to medical treatment, changing a child’s surname, and removing a child from the jurisdiction. Definition Parental responsibility relates to the care and raising of a child until they reach adulthood. Under the ChA 1989, parental responsibility comprises all the rights, duties, powers, responsibilities and authority that, in law, a parent holds in respect of their child and the child’s property. It also embraces the rights, powers and duties that a guardian of the child’s estate (appointed before the ChA 1989 commenced) possessed in relation to the child’s property. Those rights extend to receiving or recovering, in the guardian’s own name for the child’s benefit, property of any description and wherever located to which the child is entitled to receive...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Handling complex client complaints in law firms: bills, third‑party delays, vulnerable complainants, vexatious conduct and record‑keeping—Legal Ombudsman expectations and best practice (England and Wales)

Your complaints handling framework (see Practice Note: How to implement and maintain effective complaints handling procedures—law firms) should reflect the scale and character of your firm. Recognise that some circumstances will call for a more bespoke response, while still being managed within your overall complaints processes. This How-to-guide highlights examples where additional factors may need attention beyond those covered by your standard complaints handling framework... Complaints about the bill Concerns about bills arise fairly often. You must handle a billing complaint in exactly the same manner as any other complaint. The Legal Ombudsman (LeO) has issued guidance on Complaints about legal costs, having identified recurring themes. Although aimed particularly at matters funded by conditional fee agreements, it offers a broader view of LeO’s general approach. When assessing cost-related complaints, LeO will consider whether, from the outset, you ensured the client fully grasped what they would, or might, be required to pay. The guidance also sets out LeO’s expectations across a range of scenarios and questions where clarity on...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Light touch contracts under the Procurement Act 2023: scope, thresholds, notices, tendering and award, user choice, public service mutuals reservations, frameworks, modifications and remedies

STOP PRESS From 24 February 2025, the core provisions of the Procurement Act 2023 (PA 2023) take effect and apply. Competitions commencing on or after that date must proceed under PA 2023, while procurements started under the earlier regimes — the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (PCR 2015), the Utilities Contracts Regulations 2016, the Concession Regulations 2016, and the Defence and Security Public Contracts Regulations 2011 — must continue to be run and overseen in line with those rules and procedures accordingly. See Practice Note: Introduction to the Procurement Act 2023—PA 2023. This material concerns the Procurement Act 2023 regime. It provides practical guidance on public procurement under the Procurement Act 2023 (PA 2023). For practical guidance on light touch contracts under the former legislation, see Practice Note: Considerations when authorities procure contracts that are not subject to the full procurement regime. Overview of the light touch public procurement regime Under PA 2023, light touch contracts (LTCs) mean contracts wholly or predominantly for the delivery of identified...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about KA-CARE

PRECEDENTS
Scott Schedule for Construction Variation Claims: Template and Examples, with JCT Guidance on Valuation, Loss and Expense, Separation from extension of time and prolongation, and Avoiding Double Recovery

Variations can also push back the completion date, and may give the Claimant a right to extra time and to prolongation costs. These elements of a variation claim are commonly pursued separately, as an extension of time claim and a prolongation costs claim. By way of illustration, the principal JCT forms provide distinct procedures: one for pricing the changed work, and another for evaluating loss and expense arising from the variation’s effect on the progress of the works (see Practice Note: JCT contracts—variations — Valuing variations under JCT contracts). Accordingly, Claimants should take care not to ‘double dip’ across the separate elements of the claims. No. Description of Variation Claimant’s case Defendant’s response Judge/Tribunal comments The Claimant intended to adopt slab foundations for block A, as depicted on the Claimant’s drawing reference XX dated XX. By email dated XX, the Defendant directed the use of piled foundations for block A...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Statutory Carer’s Leave: Model Employer Policy for Great Britain — entitlement, dependants, long‑term care need, notice, postponement, pay and return to work

1 Introduction 1.1 This policy explains how [ insert name of organisation ] (the Company) will handle the statutory entitlement that permits employees to take unpaid time away from work to organise or provide care for a dependant with a long-term care need, and sets out the steps you should follow if you need to request this leave. 1.2 [ This policy applies solely to employees. It does not extend to agency workers, consultants [ , contractors ] [ , volunteers ] [ , interns ] or casual workers. OR This policy applies to all employees, officers, agency workers, consultants [ , contractors ] [ , volunteers ] [ , interns ] and casual workers. ] 1.3 This policy has been [ agreed OR introduced following consultation ] with [ [ enter name of relevant trade union(s) ] OR [ enter name of works council ] OR [ enter name of staff association ] ]. 1.4 In some circumstances, you may have the right to take...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Template ET3 grounds to resist agency worker antenatal appointment time off claim (England, Wales and Scotland)

[ Insert in para 6.1 of response form ET3: ] It is accepted that the Claimant is an agency worker with the First Respondent. It is accepted that she began an assignment with the Second Respondent on [ insert date ]...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Q&As about KA-CARE

Q&As
Under‑18 work experience: do employers need a safeguarding policy?

Safeguarding (and promoting the welfare of children) is defined in the Government’s statutory guidance: Working together to safeguard children as: keeping children safe from maltreatment averting impairment to children’s health and development making sure children are raised in conditions that align with safe and effective care acting to ensure every child can achieve the best outcomes There is no specific obligation on an employer providing work experience to young people under 18 to introduce a safeguarding policy...

Read More Right Arrow
Q&As
Post-18 tertiary education after lapsed child maintenance order: para 2(3) Sch 1 CA 1989; child or PWC?

The young person is now past 18, has finished secondary schooling and is moving on to higher education. The prior maintenance arrangement has now ceased, and the child intends to seek financial provision under Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989) by making their application. Under ChA 1989, Sch 1, a parent, guardian, or special guardian of a child, or any person in whose favour a residence order is in force with respect of a child, may apply for a range of orders for the benefit of a child as provided under Sch 1...

Read More Right Arrow
Q&As
Is child maintenance ever linked to contact where PWC prevents it?

The statutory formula for child maintenance under the Child Support Act 1991 (CSA 1991) The statutory formula for child maintenance under the Child Support Act 1991 (CSA 1991) does not link the amount payable to whether the paying parent has contact with the children, other than insofar as the shared care rules operate. Under CSA 1991, s 3(5), it is recognised that, for the purposes of the Act, there can be more than one person with care in relation to the same qualifying child. The Child Support Maintenance Calculation Regulations 2012, SI 2012/2677, reg 46(2), further provide that any calculation must be grounded in the number of nights the non-resident parent is expected to care for the qualifying child overnight during the 12 months commencing on the effective date of the relevant calculation decision. The Child Maintenance Service (CMS) retains a discretion to take into account a shorter timeframe where appropriate in making that assessment...

Read More Right Arrow