Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“LexisPSL and the other Lexis solutions support our business in exactly the way we want. They enable us to quickly turn around work and deliver the best possible service to our clients.”

SBP Law

Access all documents on Kay Review

Kay Review meaning

What does Kay Review mean?
In legal and corporate practice, the Kay Review refers to the independent review, commissioned by the UK government and chaired by Professor John Kay, into how UK equity markets support long-term decision making. Its final report, The Kay Review of UK Equity Markets and Long-Term Decision Making, was published on 23 July 2012. The term is not defined in legislation or case law; it is a descriptive label for the review and its recommendations. The Review examined the investment chain (asset owners, asset managers and corporate issuers) and recommended: stronger investor stewardship; alignment of incentives with long-term value creation; clearer fiduciary standards across mandates; greater transparency of fees and costs; discouraging short-term metrics (such as routine quarterly reporting and earnings guidance); and creation of an Investor Forum for collective engagement. It influenced UK corporate governance and financial services practice, including revisions to the UK Stewardship Code and market approaches to shareholder engagement and reporting, complementing directors’ duties to promote the long-term success of the company (Companies Act 2006, section 172). Use of the term is consistent across England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. In Ireland, it is not binding but is commonly cited as persuasive in discussions on corporate governance, stewardship...
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Practice Notes about Kay Review

PRACTICE NOTES
Pension Costs and Charges Transparency: Legal Framework and FCA/DWP Disclosure Duties for Trustees, IGCs, GAAs and Asset Managers, Methodology, CTI Templates, Publication and Enforcement

Why is greater transparency required? Over time, the Kay Review, the FCA and the House of Commons' Work and Pensions Committee reached the following findings regarding the disclosure of member-borne costs and charges: Cost information provided to retail customers was not complete. The Kay Review, in particular, determined that outlays tied to implementing exit — for example, performance fees and portfolio turnover costs — were not reported to pension funds even though they were charged to those funds. Disclosure was uneven. In its 2014 Thematic Review TR14/7, the FCA noted that although some investment firms presented customers with consistent, combined charge figures across all relevant documents and platforms, there remained instances of firms quoting different charge figures across multiple documents, making fair comparisons difficult...

Read More Right Arrow