Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“We rely on LexisNexis to give us a definitive answer, quickly and reliable every time so that we can be confident in the advice we use to help our clients.”

Shelter

Access all documents on Keyword

Keyword meaning

What does Keyword mean?
Keyword: In legal practice, a keyword is a word, phrase, acronym or code name, often combined with Boolean operators (AND/OR/NOT), proximity and wildcards, used to run keyword searches across electronic documents and email to identify potentially relevant material for disclosure/discovery, regulatory investigations, DSARs and internal reviews. It is a descriptive term rather than a concept defined by legislation or case law. Once the issues, key players, entities, project names and timelines are understood, practitioners design and test keyword sets, targeting content and metadata fields, custodians and date ranges. Effective sets balance recall and precision, include synonyms and spelling variants, and are validated through sampling and hit rate analysis. Results and methodology should be documented in a search protocol to support a proportionate and defensible search. Usage is broadly consistent across England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland. Courts and regulators commonly expect parties to co-operate on reasonable, proportionate search terms; in England & Wales, Practice Direction 57AD and the Disclosure Review Document require parties to explain proposed keywords and testing as part of an agreed search methodology. Keywords are frequently used alongside analytics and Technology Assisted Review (TAR); they remain a core eDisclosure/eDiscovery tool for locating relevant documents quickly and cost-effectively.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Checklists about Keyword

CHECKLISTS
Complete keyword taxonomy for the UK Financial Services Enforcement Database (FCA, PRA, PSR): search terms for Final and Decision Notices, 2014–present

The Financial Services Enforcement Database Holds comprehensive details on all material Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) Final Notices and, where available, Decision Notices, covering the period from 2014 to the present. It further includes any Decision Notices issued by the Payment Systems Regulator (PSR). Beyond enabling filtering by rule contravention, the Enforcement Database also permits users to refine and tailor results more precisely by sector, keywords, seriousness factors, aggravating factors, mitigating factors, financial penalty, and other actions such as appeals. This document outlines the keywords for the Financial Services Enforcement Database and serves as a reference to help identify words and phrases to search for across the Database...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related News about Keyword

NEWS
September 2025 EU asset management and investment funds update: SFDR PAI disclosure practices and ESAs recommendations, ESMA risk report, CMU financing proposals, and CSDR T+1 settlement timeline

Asset management & investment funds—EU & international developments—September 2025 The three European Supervisory Authorities (the European Banking Authority, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and the European Securities and Markets Authority—ESAs) annual report on voluntary PAIs disclosures under SFDR The ESAs have released their fourth annual report on PAI disclosures under the SFDR. It concludes that financial market participants are supplying more comprehensive and higher quality disclosures, with large multinational groups most advanced. Smaller firms, by contrast, frequently blend generic environmental, social and governance or promotional material with SFDR content, leaving it unclear whether PAIs are being taken into account. The report also observes that more FMPs now provide entity‑level information in clearly labelled sustainability or SFDR sections on their websites, improving transparency and ease of access. It outlines examples of good and below‑average disclosure practices and offers recommendations to national competent authorities and to the European Commission in advance of the SFDR review. Entity level disclosures Access: good: disclosures kept in...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Keyword

PRACTICE NOTES
Financial services references to the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber): procedure, powers, disciplinary and non‑disciplinary references, expedited route, applications, appeals and third party rights

The Financial Services Enforcement Database The Financial Services Enforcement Database brings together comprehensive details on substantive Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) Final Notices and, where obtainable, Decision Notices, covering 2014 onwards. The Database can be searched and refined by fields including rule/legislation breach, keyword, sector, date, financial penalty, facets of financial penalty analysis, outcomes such as redress and prohibition orders, and further actions like referrals to the Upper Tribunal. This Practice Note sets out the law and process for making a reference to the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) following a disciplinary or non-disciplinary decision of the FCA or the PRA; including decisions on restrictions, financial penalties and prohibition orders under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA 2000), and the FCA’s registration of cryptoasset firms under the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017, SI 2017/692 (MLRs). It addresses the Upper Tribunal’s role and scope of its powers when determining references in financial services matters....

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
AI and technology-assisted disclosure under CPR Part 31 and PD 57AD: functions, process, risks, co-operation and costs (England and Wales)

This Practice Note considers the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and allied tools when preparing to give disclosure to opposing parties. It draws no distinction between disclosure under the disclosure scheme used in the Business and Property Courts and disclosure under Part 31 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The priority is to save time and costs without undermining the dependability of the disclosure produced. Why AI works in disclosure AI and related tools can be effective for disclosure because the task is often predictable. Similar kinds of disputes typically generate similar categories of documents tied to the particular issues in contention. Naturally, there will be variations from case to case, yet these do not diminish the role of AI tools. Such tools are attractive to legal advisers conducting disclosure as they reduce human effort and thus cost, while creating an audit trail to evidence the robustness of the process if the disclosure is challenged. The breadth of searches for responsive material is frequently scrutinised by opposing parties. In...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
FCA Treating Customers Fairly (TCF) post-Consumer Duty: residual application of Principles 6 and 7, CP25/37 proposals, RPPD roles, culture and MI expectations, enforcement and FOS approach (UK)

The Financial Services Enforcement Database holds comprehensive details of all substantive FCA and PRA Final Notices and, where available, Decision Notices from 2014 onwards. Search and filter options include: Rule breach (including breach of Principle 6) Keyword (including ‘Treating Customers Fairly (TCF)’) Sector Date Seriousness Aggravating and mitigating factors Financial penalty Other actions (such as referrals to the Upper Tribunal) Overview and key points This Practice Note explores the continuing significance of the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) Treating Customers Fairly (TCF) initiative after the arrival of the FCA’s Consumer Duty. TCF’s core building blocks are found in the FCA’s Principles for Business (PRIN), especially Principles 6 and 7. Once a central pillar of the FCA’s consumer protection objective, TCF was integral to securing a fair deal for consumers. This Practice Note outlines the main concepts underpinning TCF and assesses the enduring relevance and application of Principles 6 and 7...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about Keyword

PRECEDENTS
Customisable Online Brand Protection Training Slides: Trade Marks, Passing Off, Domain Names, Keyword Advertising, Advertising Practices, Defamation and Crisis Management

These training resources comprise PowerPoint template slides that outline various ways for companies to safeguard their online brands. They offer advice on protecting trade marks and domain names. The slides are designed as a foundation for anyone tasked with training others in brand protection. They can be adapted as needed and appropriate to meet individual requirements, and will assist the speaker by reducing preparation time and effort required. The materials are fully customisable as well. Click the link below to download the presentation...

Read More Right Arrow