Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“LexisNexis is great as I can find the answers I am looking for really quickly. I believe that nothing should be more than 6 clicks away - and the products from LexisNexis deliver on this standard”

Avensure

Access all documents on KM

KM meaning

Published by a LexisNexis Energy expert
What does KM mean?
KM (knowledge management) in legal practice is the organised capture, curation and reuse of a firm’s or legal team’s know‑how—such as precedents, templates, clause libraries, playbooks, practice notes and matter insights—to deliver consistent, efficient and lower‑risk advice. It is a descriptive discipline rather than a term defined in legislation or case law, although standards like ISO 30401 outline requirements for KM systems. Typical activities include developing and maintaining precedents, taxonomy and enterprise search, training and horizon scanning, post‑matter lessons learned, expertise location, document automation and quality governance (including version control and approvals). KM must operate within core legal duties: client confidentiality and legal professional privilege, conflict management, information security, data protection (UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018 in England & Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland; EU GDPR in Ireland) and respect for copyright and licensing when reusing content. Usage and terminology are broadly consistent across England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland. Many organisations appoint Professional Support Lawyers (PSLs) or Knowledge Lawyers and deploy know‑how databases and AI‑enabled search. International bodies (for example, the iaea) describe KM as an integrated, systematic approach to identifying, acquiring, developing, sharing, using and preserving knowledge to meet objectives, which reflects its role in legal services.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about KM

NEWS
EU competition law round-up: BASF/Harbour Energy Phase I clearance, merger notifications, Iberdrola/BP JV decision, and CJEU hearing on leniency confidentiality (5 June 2024)

Mergers The Commission approved BASF SE’s acquisition granting sole control of Harbour Energy Plc and, indirectly, selected assets of Wintershall DEA AG (M.11470) following a phase I review—see further, Midday Express The Commission received notifications in: VTTI/Shell/Dragon LNG (M.11572) (simplified merger procedure) EFMS/Permira/Universidad Europea (M.11549) (simplified merger procedure) The Commission issued the public version of its decision in Iberdrola/BP/JV (M.11128)—see further, decision NOTE—For all live merger investigations before the Commission, see further, EU mergers—ongoing cases tracker Antirust The Court of Justice held a hearing in Case C-2/23 FL und KM Baugesellschaft and S, a national reference from Austria seeking clarity on whether information from leniency statements and settlement submissions should be protected from criminal enforcers and damages actions—see further, application NOTE—For all live national references before the Court of Justice, see further, Court of Justice national references—ongoing cases tracker Upcoming dates For...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK Public Law Weekly: Brexit/Windsor Framework scrutiny, data adequacy, REUL SIs, Procurement Act national security, key judicial reviews, ECHR developments, NSIA order — 20 March 2025

In this issue: Brexit highlights Brexit SIs Post-Brexit transition guidance Constitutional and administrative law Public procurement Judicial review Equality and human rights State accountability and liability Subsidy control and State aid New and updated content Dates for your diary Useful information Brexit highlights Northern Ireland Scrutiny Committee launches inquiry on Windsor Framework The Northern Ireland Scrutiny Committee has begun its first inquiry into Northern Ireland’s voice under the Windsor Framework. It will review various engagement tools, including the Stormont Brake and the applicability motion process. Written evidence is invited until 30 April 2025, with oral hearings starting on 19 March 2025. The Committee will draw on evidence gathered by the House of Lords European Affairs Sub-Committee since May 2024, examining how well current structures enable Northern Ireland stakeholders to more effectively engage with EU legislation. See: LNB News 14/03/2025 39. European Commission proposes six-month extension of UK data adequacy...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
EU competition law round-up: AG proposes annulling Fehmarn Belt State aid approval; Apple notifies Ads and Maps under DMA; CJEU Trenitalia hearing; merger filings; calendar

State aid AG issues opinion proposing Court of Justice set aside General Court’s judgment and annul Commission’s decision approving financing model for the Fehmarn Belt fixed rail-road link project Advocate General Rantos has delivered his opinion in Case C‑337/24 P, Denmark v Commission, challenging the General Court’s ruling in Case T‑364/20, which dismissed an application to annul the Commission’s approval of Denmark’s public financing model for the Fehmarn Belt fixed rail-road link between Denmark and Germany, an immersed tunnel under the Baltic Sea (SA.39078). The Advocate General advises that the Court of Justice should set aside the General Court’s judgment and annul the Commission’s decision. Background The Fehmarn Belt fixed rail–road link is a flagship EU infrastructure priority: a 19 km immersed tunnel connecting Denmark and Germany, delivered by two Danish state-owned entities, Femern Landanlæg and Femern A/S, with total project expenditure now estimated at over DKK 62bn. Since 2009, the Commission has adopted multiple State aid decisions concerning the scheme, repeatedly examining whether Denmark’s public financing...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about KM

PRACTICE NOTES
Archived Court of Protection case tracker: key England & Wales judgments (2021–2024) on capacity, best interests, medical treatment, deprivation of liberty and cross‑border issues

ARCHIVED: This tracker is archived and no longer updated. For an overview of Court of Protection cases from 2025 onwards, see: Court of Protection—table of cases. P, Re (Property & Affairs Deputyship: Jurisdiction) [2024] EWCOP 77 (T2) Court of Protection determines it has jurisdiction to consider whether P’s mother should continue as property and affairs deputy The proceedings related to P, an adult who sustained a brain injury in an accident and had a substantial personal injury claim. His mother had been appointed by the Court of Protection as his property and affairs deputy, and the present decision addressed an application seeking to revoke that appointment. The litigation had been protracted. Earlier, the court permitted ‘closed material’ to be withheld from P’s parents to facilitate capacity assessments; for a summary of that ruling, see here. Despite that step, neither the Official Solicitor nor the court gained clarity about P’s condition or even his location. It was reported that P was now residing in Italy. HHJ Burrows concluded that...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
EU General Court annuls Commission approval of German operating aid to Frankfurt‑Hahn Airport following Lufthansa challenge (T‑218/18)

CASE HUB NOTE-appeal lodged before the Court of Justice in Case C- 466/21 ARCHIVED - this archived case hub sets out the position as at the judgment of 19 May 2021 and is no longer being updated. See further, timeline Case facts Outline Action for annulment before the General Court against the European Commission’s decision of 31 July 2017, which concluded that Germany’s public support to Frankfurt-Hahn airport did not amount to unlawful State aid (Case SA.45765) Latest developments On 19 May 2021, the General Court delivered its judgment, partially upholding the appeal and, consequently, setting aside the Commission’s 2017 decision Parties Applicants: Deutsche Lufthansa AG (hereafter, Deutsche Lufthansa) Defendant: European Commission (the Commission) Background Frankfurt-Hahn is a regional airport in the Land of Rhineland-Palatinate, about 120 km west of Frankfurt/Main. In 2016, it handled roughly 2.6 million passengers and 72,600 tonnes of freight. The airport is currently operating at a loss. Since 2009, it...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
EU Article 101 TFEU: Air France-KLM/Delta/Alitalia transatlantic JV - binding commitments with slot and access remedies on New York routes (AT.39964, 12 May 2015) [Archived]

CASE HUB ARCHIVED – this archived case hub reflects the position as at the decision date of 12 May 2015; it is no longer maintained. See further, timeline, commentary and related cases Case facts Outline European Commission probe under Article 101 TFEU into a cooperative joint venture involving Air France-KLM, Delta Air Lines and Alitalia (case AT.39964). On 12/05/2015 the Commission accepted and rendered binding the commitments offered by the parties. Parties Air France-KLM Delta Air Lines Alitalia Market(s) Scheduled passenger flights. The relevant product market is scheduled air passenger transport, with effects assessed separately for time-sensitive and non time-sensitive passengers. Geographic markets follow point of origin to point of destination (O&D) city pairs—each O&D pair is a distinct market. Multiple airports may fall within an origin or destination where travellers regard them as substitutable—typically, those within 100 km/around a 1 hour drive are considered alternatives. On long‑haul routes (over six hours), indirect services (i.e. requiring a plane...

Read More Right Arrow