Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“Although cost was an important factor, our relationship with LexisNexis, their responsiveness, flexibility, and the integration available with other products were key factors.”

Irwin Mitchell

Access all documents on Liquidation preference

Liquidation preference meaning

What does Liquidation preference mean?
Liquidation preference describes the agreed priority in which shareholders—typically holders of preference shares—are paid from surplus assets on a return of capital (for example, a winding up, sale of the company or insolvency), after all liabilities, including debts and costs of the process, have been discharged. Sometimes called a payment waterfall, it more precisely refers to the shareholder-level waterfall for distributions among classes of shares. The term is not defined in legislation or case law; it is a descriptive expression used in corporate and venture capital practice. To be effective on a winding up, the preference should be set out in the company’s articles of association (England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland) or constitution (Ireland), often mirrored in a shareholders’ agreement. Typical features specify: seniority between classes or pari passu sharing; the preference amount (for example 1x or a multiple of the subscription price, sometimes with interest); whether preferences are non-participating or participating (and any cap); and whether certain sales or mergers are treated as a deemed liquidation. Usage and effect are broadly consistent across the UK and Ireland. Preferences operate only after creditors have been paid and apply solely to any surplus available for distribution.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Liquidation preference

NEWS
Restructuring & Insolvency: DMCC Act; after-acquired property; funding termination clauses; Re C-Retail plan; paid-up secured creditor consent; Re UKCloud floating charge; insolvency practitioner fee rise; s340 preference guidance

Restructuring & Insolvency weekly highlights—6 June 2024 In this issue: Key R&I law developments Insolvency litigation Restructuring Corporate insolvency processes The office-holder Daily and weekly news alerts New content Key R&I law developments Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 This Act introduces regulation of competition within digital markets, revises the Competition Act 1998 and the Enterprise Act 2002 with additional competition law measures, and enhances consumer protection by providing and extending rights, together with related purposes. Certain provisions took effect on 24 May 2024; the remainder will commence on a day set by Regulations made by the Secretary of State. See: LNB News 04/06/2024 9. Insolvency litigation Monies paid to a bankrupt’s son were after-acquired property (Hyde v Djurberg) It is uncommon for a bankrupt to receive a significant payment that a trustee in bankruptcy may claim as after-acquired property. Rarer still is an instance where such a payment is received...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Evidential burden on sole director: s212 misfeasance for unexplained payments; s127 void dividend; limited s239 preference (England and Wales)

Bourne (as liquidator of MM Apartment Letting Ltd) and another company v Manukyan and another [2024] EWHC 832 (Ch) What are the practical implications of this case? The judgment acts as a helpful illustration of the principles the court will apply and consistently enforce in situations of this nature where numerous unexplained transfers have been made from a company’s bank account ahead of its liquidation, and the sole director fails to provide an adequate justification. What was the background? The applicant liquidator sought relief against Mr Manuk Manukyan, the sole director of MM Apartment Letting Ltd (the ‘Company’), under IA 1986, ss 212, 238 or 239 in respect of: a dividend declared and paid in June 2018 after the deemed commencement of the winding up petition, where the payment was effected without a validation order; and various payments between 14 August 2017 and 13 April 2018 made by the Company out of its bank account before its winding up, for which no...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Companies House filings binding; unconscionability perfecting imperfect share gifts; preference share redemption price determined by filings - Nosnehpetsj v Watersheds [2020] EWHC 1938 (Ch) (England and Wales)

Nosnehpetsj Ltd (in liquidation) v Watersheds Capital Partners Ltd and another [2020] EWHC 1938 (Ch), [2020] All ER (D) 144 (Jul) What are the practical implications of this case? The key takeaway is that directors will generally be held to the content of confirmation statements, accounts and, for the period before 2016, annual returns. Many private companies operate with a degree of informality, and directors sometimes shift assets within a small group merely by reflecting the transfers in those filings. A director who acts in that way is unlikely to be allowed to step back from those actions by asserting that corporate formalities were not observed, particularly where third parties have relied on the records or one group company has gone into insolvency. The old saying that equity will not assist a volunteer carries limited weight in corporate contexts. The modern stance is that equity will not go out of its way to thwart a gift. Contemporaneous records will be preferred over after-the-event assertions by directors. The decision also...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Liquidation preference

PRACTICE NOTES
Scotland: Corporate unfair preferences and gratuitous alienations (Insolvency Act 1986 ss 242–243)—hardening periods, statutory/common law challenges, defences, standing and remedies; key case law including Carnbroe

Sections 242 and 243 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) In Scotland, these provisions regulate the two principal forms of antecedent transaction that a company may undertake. They do not apply to individuals or to companies registered in England and Wales; for the position in England, refer to the Practice Notes on transactions at an undervalue under section 238 and on preferences under section 239 of the Insolvency Act 1986. For Scottish individual/personal debtors, consult the Practice Note on gratuitous alienations by individual debtors. For a glossary of frequently used Scottish insolvency terminology, see Practice Note: Glossary of Scottish insolvency words and expressions. Unfair preferences What constitutes an unfair preference? An unfair preference is any transaction entered into by a company, whether before or after 1 April 1986, that has the effect of giving one creditor priority over the general body of creditors (IA 1986, s 243(1)). The date on which the unfair preference arises is the date the transaction became effectual. Hardening periods...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
A-Z glossary of UK corporate restructuring and insolvency: key terms, procedures, enforcement and cross-border issues

This glossary sets out numerous expressions frequently encountered in the restructuring arena. Words appearing in the definitions in bold are explained in other entries in this glossary. For further banking terminology, see the principal Banking & Finance Glossary. Restructuring glossary—A Acceleration: Acceleration means the agent, acting on directions from the majority lenders after an event of default, takes formal action, for example calling for early repayment of the facility. Ad-hoc committee: A temporary creditors’ group (often contrasted with a formal committee) that lacks any entitlement to official recognition. Administration: A process under the IA 1986 in which a financially distressed company is operated by an administrator as a going concern before longer-term outcomes, such as break-up and sale, are pursued. Administrator: An Insolvency Practitioner named by the court, a Qualifying floating charge holder, the directors or the company, to take control and fulfil one of the purposes in IA 1986, Sch B1. Administrative receivership: Arises when a company breaches the terms of...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Glossary of Scottish Insolvency Law Terms with England and Wales Equivalents

This is a glossary of common words and expressions used in Scottish insolvency law with the nearest England and Wales insolvency law equivalent (where relevant) Absolute insolvency Meaning: When a person’s liabilities are greater than the overall worth of their assets. Nearest English equivalent: Balance sheet insolvency. Accountant in Bankruptcy (AiB) Meaning: A Scottish Government agency overseeing the regulation of personal bankruptcy (sequestration and Protected Trust Deeds) in Scotland, and able to serve as trustee in sequestrations where no insolvency practitioner is appointed. It also maintains records of corporate insolvencies in Scotland (receivership and liquidations only) but does not perform the role of Official Receiver. See Practice Note: Scotland: the Accountant in Bankruptcy. Nearest English equivalent: N/A. Accountant of Court Meaning: A court-appointed officer within Scottish Courts and Tribunals who administers funds consigned to the Accountant of Court pursuant to a Court of Session interlocutor or during liquidation proceedings. They oversee Judicial Factors or Administrators appointed by the Court to manage estates...

Read More Right Arrow