Powered by Lexis+®
Related Content
CASE STUDY

“LexisNexis is great as I can find the answers I am looking for really quickly. I believe that nothing should be more than 6 clicks away - and the products from LexisNexis deliver on this standard”

Avensure

Access all documents on Local call fee access

Local call fee access meaning

What does Local call fee access mean?
Local call fee access describes, in practice, a tariff arrangement under which calls to certain non-geographic (number translation Service, NTS) numbers are charged to the caller at no more than the standard geographic rate (for example, 01/02/03 in the UK, geographic codes in Ireland), rather than a premium rate. It is a descriptive, contract‑driven expression rather than a term defined by statute or case law. In the UK, Ofcom’s non-geographic call services regime means 03 numbers must be charged at geographic rates and included in bundles, while 084/087 numbers attract an access charge plus a service charge and must not be advertised as “local rate”. The historic concept of a distinct “local call rate” on landlines has largely fallen away. In Ireland, “LoCall” 1890 numbers were withdrawn as part of ComReg’s NGN reforms, and current NGN pricing and advertising are regulated by ComReg; providers commonly align certain NGN charges with geographic rates, but tariffs should be checked. Legally significant when drafting telecoms agreements, contact-centre terms and price announcements: it signals that callers will not incur premium-rate or higher-than-geographic charges, and helps mitigate consumer protection and advertising-compliance risks.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Local call fee access

NEWS
Weekly local government legal update: housing, education, planning, finance, procurement, governance, healthcare, social care, licensing and environmental law—key cases, legislation and policy updates (2 October 2025)

In this issue: Social housing Education Planning Local government finance Public procurement Governance Healthcare Social care Licensing Environmental law and climate change LexTalk®Local Government: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Social housing Local authority successful in Court of Appeal on suitability of accommodation offered in performance of prevention duty (Fatolahzadeh v LB of Barnet) Fatolahzadeh v LB of Barnet saw Genevieve Screeche-Powell represent the council, which prevailed in resisting a Housing Act 1996 (HA 1996), section 204 appeal pursued by a homeless applicant. Two central issues of principle arose: (i) whether Parliament intended that an alleged non-compliance with the ‘new’ HA 1996, s 189A duties should automatically vitiate any later decision taken to meet the duty to secure suitable accommodation; and (ii) the extent to which the section 202 review procedure can rectify asserted shortcomings. This marks the first occasion on which the Court...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Local government update: case law, funding and regulatory changes across housing, children's services, education, planning, highways, procurement, governance, finance, social care, health, licensing and environment - 29 January 2026

In this issue: Social housing Children's social care Education Planning Highways Public procurement Governance Local government finance Adult social care Healthcare Licensing Environmental law and climate change Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Social housing Social housing To be or not to be… the recurring question of when a homelessness application is an application at all (R (Lyrae) v Somerset Council) In R (Lyrae) v Somerset Council, the High Court endorsed the Court of Appeal’s dicta in Rikha Begum—picked up and used in Minott and Ivory—on how to treat a subsequent ‘fresh’ homelessness approach. The analysis comprises two steps. First (stage one), decide whether the later approach counts as an application at all; the only time the answer is ‘no’ is where it rests on exactly the same factual matrix as the earlier one, ignoring fanciful assertions and insignificant details. Secondly (stage two), if it...

Read More Right Arrow