Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Related Glossary Terms

CASE STUDY

“LexisLibrary gives us the most relevant and recent cases and always has the latest information on them. It makes research so much easier. We're more cost-effective for our clients and more efficient each day”

Advocates

Access all documents on Loss

Loss meaning

What does Loss mean?
In legal practice, loss means the harm, detriment or deprivation suffered—financial, physical or proprietary—and is not confined to permanent deprivation; temporary loss can suffice. The term is a broad, descriptive label used across civil, criminal, regulatory and insurance contexts. Some statutes define it for particular purposes: e.g., the Fraud Act 2006 (E&W and NI) defines gain or loss in money or other property and includes temporary loss; exposing another to a risk of loss may suffice. Comparable wording appears in Ireland. In Scotland, fraud is largely common law, but usage is similar. In civil claims (contract and tort/delict), damages compensate for loss proved, subject to causation, remoteness and mitigation. Typical heads include expectation loss, reliance loss, loss of profits, diminution in value, wasted expenditure and, where permitted, non-pecuniary loss (pain and suffering). Consequential loss commonly denotes loss within the second limb of Hadley v Baxendale; the approach is broadly consistent across the UK and Ireland. Recovery of pure economic loss, particularly in negligence, is restricted. In insurance, loss denotes the insured event and the measure of indemnity, including partial or total loss.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Checklists about Loss

CHECKLISTS
UK post-Brexit finance documentation checklist: facility agreements, security, loss of passporting rights, retained EU law, benchmarks, tax, sanctions, COMI, IFRS, BRRD, governing law, jurisdiction, insolvency and IP

Checklist (Archived) This Checklist sets out key checks for facility and security documentation after the Brexit implementation period. ARCHIVED: This Checklist has been archived and is not maintained. When that period ended, EU law was transposed into UK law as retained EU law under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (as amended by the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020), in most cases with only minor adjustments. See Practice Note: Retained EU law and assimilated law. Read this alongside Practice Notes: Brexit—documentary implications for facility agreements [Archived] and Brexit—impact on finance transactions [Archived]. The focus is on documentary issues and it does not capture every potential consideration for finance transactions following the end of the implementation period. For a fuller overview, see Practice Notes: What does IP completion day mean for lending lawyers? [Archived] and Brexit—impact on finance transactions [Archived]. Loss of passporting rights Issue: Loss of passporting rights Question: There is an EU27 borrower under the facilities agreement. What steps should be...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
General damages valuation: checklist covering PSLA, Smith v Manchester, loss of congenial employment, whiplash tariffs, aggravated damages, fatal accidents and interest (England and Wales)

Checklist This checklist sets out the matters a practitioner ought to weigh when assessing general damages. It reviews various heads of damage, such as pain, suffering and loss of amenity (PSLA), Smith v Manchester awards, loss of congenial employment, loss of use, holiday disruption, harm to relationships, reduced marriage prospects, aggravated damages, unnecessary treatment, fatal accidents, and interest. PSLA Pain and suffering reflect the claimant’s personal, subjective experience. Loss of amenity denotes a diminished capacity to carry out ordinary activities. Damages can be granted for physical and/or psychiatric injury and cover distress in the past, present, and future. There is no precise formula for valuation in these assessments of such claims...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
RTA Small Claims Protocol (England and Wales): Scope, Exclusions, Portal Procedure, Whiplash Tariff (2025), Mixed Injury Damages, Evidence, Medical Reports, Offers and Liability

The Pre-Action Protocol for Personal Injury Claims Below the Small Claims Limit in Road Traffic Accidents (RTA Small Claims Protocol) is engaged for collisions taking place on or after 31 May 2021. For RTA personal injury matters, the small claims track cap for general damages—covering pain, suffering and loss of amenity (PSLA)—now stands at £5,000, save for exceptions in CPR 26.10 and CPR 26.11. The protocol is intended for situations where a person has sustained injuries in a road traffic accident (including, though not confined to, whiplash) and wishes to pursue compensation, provided the sum claimed for the injury does not exceed £5,000 and the value of the case does not exceed £10,000. It operates for claimants pursuing personal injury compensation from RTAs within these injury and overall value limits. For additional guidance on using the RTA Small Claims Protocol, consult Practice Note: The road traffic accident small claims protocol...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Flowcharts about Loss

FLOWCHARTS
Flowchart: notification, substantiation and assessment of loss and expense claims under the JCT Standard Building Contract 2016 and 2024

Select here to download a PDF edition...

Read More Right Arrow
FLOWCHARTS
UK Corporation Tax: Order of Relief for Trading, Property, Capital and Other Losses in Pre‑April 2017 Accounting Periods (Flowchart)

This flowchart relates to losses incurred before 1 April 2017 that are set against profits arising in those relevant accounting periods that commence before 1 April 2017...

Read More Right Arrow
FLOWCHARTS
Loss and Expense Claims under JCT Design and Build 2016/2024: Procedural Flowchart

I’m ready to rewrite your content as requested. Please paste the original text between the START and END tags, including any subheading title, and I’ll deliver a UK English version with the same message, tone, and length, using fresh phrasing and suitable HTML structure...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related News about Loss

NEWS
UK employment law weekly: key cases, HMCTS changes, MoJ NDA guidance, possible tribunal fees, FCA misconduct focus, AI and workplace speech, HMRC EV mileage, EU traineeships, diary dates

In this issue: Horizon scanning Status and worker categories Benefits Prohibited conduct Unfair dismissal Settlement Employment tribunals Dates for your diary Trackers New Q&As Employment resources on Lexis+® LexTalk®Employment: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts Horizon scanning What to watch in Employment law this winter In 2025, the government’s suite of employment reforms has set the pace, yet noteworthy shifts in case law and workplace culture also merit close attention as winter draws in. Some updates will stem from regulators, including the Financial Conduct Authority, which is anticipated to finalise guidance on tackling non-financial misconduct. Practitioners should also be mindful of the broader adoption of artificial intelligence, alongside a rise in employees voicing politically sensitive opinions at work, both of which demand vigilance as 2026 approaches. See Law360: What to watch in employment law this winter. Status and worker categories European Parliament ready to negotiate better...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK dispute resolution weekly update: cross‑border service/enforcement, limitation on fee shortfalls, CPR 7.7, arbitration non‑intervention, data security duties, expert determination, Scottish horizon—5 March 2026

In this issue: Key DR developments Cross-border disputes Pre-action and limitation Litigation Case management Evidence and disclosure ADR Scottish Dispute Resolution Dates for your diary Useful information Daily and weekly news alerts Key DR developments Guidance and reports Courts and Tribunals Judiciary publishes February 2026 updated edition of the Equal Treatment Bench Book: The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has issued an interim February 2026 update to the Equal Treatment Bench Book. For more information, see: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary publishes February 2026 updated edition Equal Treatment Bench Book—LNB News 26/02/2026 28. HCCH publishes 2025 annual report highlighting private international law developments The Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) has released its 2025 annual report, noting the creation of two new Experts’ Groups to examine private international law topics linked to Digital Tokens and Carbon Markets. For more information, see: HCCH publishes 2025 annual report highlighting private international law...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK Dispute Resolution: Form N215 Update, Court Expansion, Estoppel on Defective Security, Commercial Court Loss Quantification, Costs Orders Including BHP, Scottish Horizon, and Consultations for 29 January 2026

In this issue: Key DR developments Claims and remedies Cost and funding Case management Scottish Dispute Resolution New content Dates for your diary Useful information Daily and weekly news alerts Key DR developments Court information HMCTS updates Form N215 certificate of service HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has issued a revised English Form N215 Certificate of Service for civil proceedings, which also brings in a new statement of truth. While the layout has been updated, the details required remain unchanged, with extra notes added to assist with completing the form. For further detail, see: HMCTS updates Form N215 certificate of service—LNB News 27/01/2026 36. Additional permanent courtrooms to boost capacity The government will make four former Nightingale Courts in Fleetwood, Telford, Chichester and Cirencester permanent, creating 11 additional courtrooms across England and Wales to increase capacity for criminal, family and civil work and help cut delays. For further detail, see:...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Loss

PRACTICE NOTES
Contractual damages and remedies under English law: termination, causation, remoteness, mitigation, expectation/reliance/restitution, quantification (Ruxley), non-pecuniary loss, and liquidated damages versus penalties (Cavendish v Makdessi)

Overview This Practice Note forms part of our LLB Contract Law series for law students. It surveys the remedies for breach of contract, with damages at the heart of the common law response. Setting remedies within the framework of contract, it explains when a party may terminate—most notably for breach of conditions and of innominate (or ‘intermediate’) terms. It then sets out the expectation principle from Robinson v Harman (1848) 1 Exch 850, stressing that an award should put the claimant in the position they would have been in had performance occurred. The Note next traces the principal constraints on recovery—causation, remoteness, and the duty to mitigate—and discusses leading cases on mitigation to show how these limits operate even once breach is proved. It also considers alternative measures—expectation, reliance and, in rare cases, restitutionary recovery—before addressing quantification, including the contrast between ‘difference in value’ and ‘cost of cure’ illustrated by Ruxley Electronics v Forsyth [1996] AC 344. Finally, it deals with non-pecuniary loss and the contemporary approach to liquidated...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Ireland: EU GDPR Personal Data Breach Management, Risk Assessment and Notification - Practical Guide Based on DPC and EDPB Guidance

Data security sits at the heart of the EU General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR). The sixth data protection principle—integrity and confidentiality—requires you to adopt suitable technical and organisational measures so that personal data is processed with appropriate security, including: protection against unauthorised or unlawful processing accidental loss, destruction, or damage This Practice Note reflects Data Protection Commission (DPC) guidance on personal data breaches under the EU GDPR, and also draws on guidance from the European Data Protection Board (EDPB). Data security requirements Article 32 puts practical detail behind the GDPR’s integrity and confidentiality principle. You must implement appropriate technical and organisational measures to achieve a level of security proportionate to the risk, taking into account: the nature, scope, context, and purpose of processing the risk of varying likelihood and severity for the rights and freedoms of data subjects Where appropriate, your security measures should include: the pseudonymisation and encryption of...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Musharaka partnerships in Islamic finance: types, legal requirements, capital and management, profit and loss allocation, termination, duration and applications

Introduction to Musharaka—a profit and loss sharing instrument of Islamic finance At the heart of Islamic finance lies the maxim ‘no profit without risk’, ie no person should realise a gain unless they bear some degree of risk. This concept is most clearly shown through the application of profit and loss sharing instruments. For further detail on this principle, see Practice Note: Key principles of Islamic finance. This Practice Note examines Musharaka, an Islamic finance technique originally founded on profit and loss sharing and broadly analogous to a conventional partnership arrangement. In straightforward terms, a Musharaka is a partnership customarily entered into by two or more parties, not necessarily for a fixed term, and most commonly for the purpose of undertaking a business venture. In a typical Musharaka, each participant makes a capital contribution to the venture and profits and losses are shared between them. A comparable Islamic finance arrangement premised on the same profit and loss sharing rule is Mudaraba, a special form of partnership in which only...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about Loss

PRECEDENTS
Scott Schedule for Construction Variation Claims: Template and Examples, with JCT Guidance on Valuation, Loss and Expense, Separation from extension of time and prolongation, and Avoiding Double Recovery

Variations can also push back the completion date, and may give the Claimant a right to extra time and to prolongation costs. These elements of a variation claim are commonly pursued separately, as an extension of time claim and a prolongation costs claim. By way of illustration, the principal JCT forms provide distinct procedures: one for pricing the changed work, and another for evaluating loss and expense arising from the variation’s effect on the progress of the works (see Practice Note: JCT contracts—variations — Valuing variations under JCT contracts). Accordingly, Claimants should take care not to ‘double dip’ across the separate elements of the claims. No. Description of Variation Claimant’s case Defendant’s response Judge/Tribunal comments The Claimant intended to adopt slab foundations for block A, as depicted on the Claimant’s drawing reference XX dated XX. By email dated XX, the Defendant directed the use of piled foundations for block A...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Buyer-favourable warranty and tax covenant limitations schedule for corporate seller SPAs: periods, caps, de minimis, specific exclusions, claims conduct, third-party recoveries and mitigation

Insert the following as new definitions (if not already included) in the definitions and interpretation clause of the share purchase agreement: 1 Definitions and interpretation Fairly Disclosed • means information [ fully, fairly and accurately ] disclosed [ (relating specifically to the subject matter of the Warranty and without omitting any fact which may render the Warranty and the matter disclosed untrue, inaccurate and misleading) ] and presented with sufficient clarity and detail to allow a buyer to reach a clear, informed and accurate evaluation of the relevant facts, matters or circumstances concerned; Losses • means any and all liabilities, costs, outgoings (including legal expenses), claims, actions, proceedings, damages, fines, penalties, loss of profit [ and Consequential Loss ]; Tax Warranties • denotes the warranties [ and representations ] contained in paragraph [ insert number ] of Schedule [ insert number ], and Tax Warranty refers to any one of them; Warranties • signifies the warranties [ and representations ] included in Schedule [...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Schedule of Employer‑Favouring Amendments to JCT SBC/AQ 2016 (England): Building Safety Act/HRB, Dutyholder and CDM compliance; design liability; collateral warranties; insurance; payment; insolvency; adjudication (arbitration removed)

The Contract comprises the completed Standard Building Contract With Approximate Quantities 2016 published by the JCT subject to the following amendments: This Contract adopts JCT SBC/AQ 2016 with extensive modifications to reflect design responsibility, building safety and commercial controls. Recitals: Contractor to provide a master programme and Schedule of Information Requirements; confirms site due diligence and accepts full CDP design liability. Articles: Dutyholder Regulations added; Tender Price covers Principal Contractor duties; arbitration removed; Schedule of Amendments prevails; strict protection of Third Party Agreements. Definitions/governance: new and revised terms (Building Safety Regulator, HRB, Practical Completion, Copyright Material, Design Sub‑contractors, Dutyholder Regulations); several deletions; English court jurisdiction. Design/materials/information: skill‑and‑care design and coordination; only new, compliant, non‑deleterious materials; golden thread storage; monthly programme reporting; site risks at Contractor’s risk. Procedures/controls: tighter instruction, testing, defects and as‑built duties; enhanced confidentiality and IP licences; HRB assistance; CDM/Dutyholder competency confirmations. Sub‑contracting/rights: prescribed sub‑contracts, insurances and delivery of collateral warranties/third‑party rights; limits on assignment. Payment/commercial: 28‑day final...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Q&As about Loss

Q&As
Professional deputy costs: from deputy or special damages?

If the claimant qualifies as a protected party within the Court of Protection’s remit, fees imposed by that Court, both historic and prospective, may properly form part of the claim made. Further charges will also be incurred where a deputy is appointed to manage the claimant’s property and financial affairs. These charges and expenses can be set out within the schedule of past and future loss and damage as distinct heads of damage...

Read More Right Arrow
Q&As
Deed of Appropriation: when and to whom—second estate property sale

Sale by PRs or appropriation to beneficiaries We understand you are asking when it is better for the personal representatives (PRs) to dispose of an estate property, or instead to appropriate it to the beneficiaries so that they handle the sale themselves. This choice typically arises where: the beneficiary(ies) has/have part or all of their capital gains tax (CGT) annual exemption available the beneficiary(ies) will pay CGT at 18% on any part of a gain the beneficiary(ies) has/have losses available to offset against any gain the sale will make a loss and the PRs will not be making any further disposals that may produce gains to utilise the loss A death is not usually a chargeable occasion for CGT. For these purposes the PRs are treated as acquiring the assets at market value on the date of death; effectively, all prior accrued gains are eliminated and the PRs start again with a clean slate...

Read More Right Arrow
Q&As
Recoverability of rent loss in terminal dilapidations where tenant’s Pre-Action Protocol breach leaves works unfunded and delays re-letting

Damages After the lease ends, a landlord’s terminal dilapidations claim lies in damages. The recoverable sum is determined by common law rules for assessing loss arising from breach of the repairing covenant, but is curtailed by the statutory ceiling in section 18(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1927 (LTA 1927). At common law, the benchmark for disrepair is the reasonable expenditure required to restore the premises to the condition they should have been in at the point of lease expiry. The claim for damages may, in addition, encompass foreseeable knock-on losses, including rent foregone during any period when the state of disrepair prevents the property being relet...

Read More Right Arrow