Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“It really is saving us a huge number of hours over the days, weeks and months. Having more relevant support at hand, not having to draft or review documents them from scratch - it all adds up.”

Southampton FC

Access all documents on LPO

LPO meaning

What does LPO mean?
LPO (legal process outsourcing) is the engagement by a law firm or in‑house legal team of a third‑party provider—onshore or offshore, often an alternative legal service provider (ALSP)—to deliver repeatable processes and support tasks (for example document review for disclosure/e‑disclosure (eDiscovery), contract lifecycle management, due diligence and company secretarial support). It is a descriptive term, not defined in legislation or case law, and usage is broadly consistent across England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland. Key legal features include: the instructing firm/GC retains responsibility and supervision; reserved legal activities/regulated services must be carried out by authorised persons; client confidentiality and legal professional privilege must be protected; robust conflict checks; and appropriate professional indemnity arrangements. outsourcing must comply with the SRA Standards and Regulations (England & Wales) and equivalent rules of the Law Society of Scotland, Law Society of Northern Ireland and Law Society of Ireland. UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018 (and EU GDPR in Ireland) apply, including safeguards for international transfers (IDTA or EU Standard Contractual Clauses), security, audit rights and breach reporting. Typical LPO contracts set service levels and KPIs, pricing (often fixed‑fee or FTE), confidentiality, intellectual property ownership and exit/transition.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about LPO

NEWS
COVID-19 lockdown reinsurance: English High Court confirms ‘catastrophe’ and rejects 168-hour LPO 98 limit—Unipolsai v Covéa; GenRe v Markel—implications for non-damage business interruption

The ruling is rare, partly as reinsurance rows in England are usually settled behind closed doors in arbitration rather than aired in open court. Consequently, such written judgments are infrequent. It also raised an issue over what many UK insurers label ‘non-damage’ Covid-related claims, implying losses where premises sustained no physical injury yet fell within reinsurance protection, that is, claims triggered by the pandemic without any tangible breakage or alteration to structures. The cover in dispute concerned business interruption during the government-ordered lockdown, regardless of any structural impact to the business premises, or any physical alteration to the site. This piece sets out the principal arguments and determinations arising from the case, in summary. The reinsurers appealed arbitral awards obliging them to indemnify their insureds, namely the direct insurers, under their reinsurance contracts. Central questions included whether the surge in coronavirus cases before the lockdown order amounted to a covered catastrophe and, if so, whether the so‑called hours clause ultimately capped post‑order recovery to a fixed...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about LPO

PRACTICE NOTES
In-house legal outsourcing options: maximising existing resources; choosing panels, sole or ad hoc external counsel (including direct to barristers); engaging ALSPs (LPO, flexible resourcing) and BPO; assessment framework

Until quite recently, outsourcing legal work largely involved approaching external lawyers, virtually cap in hand. Now, the landscape has matured and diversified, leaving in-house lawyers with an array of business and service delivery models to select from. This Practice Note is aimed at in-house lawyers contemplating handing portions of legal work to external suppliers. It forms part of a broader suite of guidance and Precedents created to support your outsourcing decision. It sets out the range of outsourcing options and encourages consideration of: getting more from existing arrangements, including internal resource engaging external counsel alternative legal services providers (ALSPs) business process outsourcing (BPO) See also Practice Notes: Legal services outsourcing—in-house lawyers—information gathering Legal services outsourcing—in-house lawyers—which legal services to outsource Exploit what you already have Before turning to outsourcing, can you make better use of what already exists...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about LPO

PRECEDENTS
In‑House Legal Resourcing and Outsourcing Strategy Template: Retain‑or‑Outsource Criteria, Supplier Options (including LPO/BPO), Cost and Resource Implications, Risks and Next Steps

1 Introduction This paper was compiled by [ insert name or role ] on [ insert date ]. It outlines the intended approach to resourcing [ insert organisation’s name ]’s legal services, identifying which activities should be commissioned from external providers and which should continue to be delivered in-house...

Read More Right Arrow