Powered by Lexis+®
CASE STUDY

“We have to become more agile as our clients' expectations and requirements change. The only thing we know is that tomorrow is going to be different and we must be prepared. With LexisNexis, I feel more confident of that we're ready every time.”

Wolverhampton County Council

Access all documents on Mainstream school

Mainstream school meaning

What does Mainstream school mean?
In legal practice, a mainstream school is an ordinary primary or secondary school educating pupils of varied abilities and aptitudes, as distinct from a special school. In England and Wales, the term is defined in the Children and Families Act 2014 as a maintained school or Academy that is not a special school, and there is a statutory presumption that children and young people with special educational needs (SEN) are educated in mainstream, subject to compatibility with the efficient education of others and efficient use of resources. The Equality Act 2010 requires reasonable adjustments and non-discrimination. In Scotland, “mainstream” is a descriptive term; the law creates a presumption of mainstreaming for pupils with additional support needs (ASN), subject to limited exceptions, with Equality Act 2010 duties applying. In Northern Ireland, legislation generally uses “ordinary” school rather than “mainstream”, but the effect is equivalent. Inclusion and reasonable adjustment duties arise under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (as amended). In Ireland, “mainstream” is widely used in legislation and policy to denote schools (and classes) other than special schools, with inclusive education and reasonable accommodation duties under the Equal Status Acts. The term is central to placement decisions (including EHC plans/SEN statements), admissions, support, and funding.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Mainstream school

NEWS
Higgs v Farmor’s School: England and Wales Court of Appeal says offence or speculative reputational harm insufficient; employers must justify disciplining off-duty online expression of protected beliefs

Higgs v Farmor’s School and (1) the Archbishops’ Council of the Church of England, (2) the Free Speech Union Ltd others as interveners), the Association of Christian Teachers, (4) Sex Matters, (5) the Equality and Human Rights Commission (as interveners) [2025] EWCA Civ 109 A school worker’s success is set to shape how employers and tribunals approach cases where staff spark outrage by airing an increasing range of legally protected views, commonly online. Justice Nicholas Underhill, writing for a unanimous panel, confirmed that employers carry the burden of proof to show any disciplinary step is “objectively justified”. Free speech supporters welcomed the judgment as a landmark in human rights law, granting employees broad room to use unrestrained and provocative language. Susan Kelly, partner at Winckworth Sherwood LLP, said it re‑emphasised the democratic importance of workers being able to say what they believe, “whether or not that belief is popular or mainstream”. Andrea Williams, chief executive of the Christian Legal Centre, stated the ruling declares “loud and clear that...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Local government and public services: key cases, procurement reforms, council tax reduction scheme unlawful, SEND/FE changes, planning and CPO updates, DHSC-NHS joint executive team, Welsh reforms

In this issue: Social care Social housing Local government finance Public procurement Governance Education Healthcare Social care Children’s social care Planning Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Social care Social care Administrative Court requests Court of Justice preliminary ruling under UK-EU Withdrawal Agreement in universal credit and domestic violence case (R (BZ) v SSWP) In R (BZ) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, the court’s focus was whether a reference to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling should be made under Article 158(1) of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (WA). At paragraph [104], Mr Justice Chamberlain explained that power to seek the Court of Justice’s view on the meaning of Article 17(2) exists only where resolving that point is necessary to deliver...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Mainstream school

PRACTICE NOTES
EHC plans and post‑19 SEND education in England: assessments, placements (mainstream/specialist), maintenance or cessation to 25, capacity and preferences, Local Offer and five‑day provision

Part 3 of the Children and Families Act 2014 (CFA 2014) Part 3 of the CFA 2014 sets out the primary statutory framework for children and young people in England who have special educational needs or disabilities (SEND). It brings in ‘Education, Health and Care plans’ (EHC plans), which specify the support that must be delivered to meet identified educational needs. This support can be available to young people up to the age of 25 throughout England. See Practice Note: Special educational needs in England under the Children and Families Act 2014. For the position in Wales, see Practice Note: Special educational needs law in Wales, respectively. Compulsory school age runs until the last Friday in June in the year a young person turns 16. For the purposes of the CFA 2014, anyone above compulsory school age but under 25 is treated as a ‘young person’. Young people with Special Educational Needs (SEN) who wish to pursue further education are entitled to have their EHC plan...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
EHC needs assessments and EHC plans in England: statutory duties, required advice, timescales, drafting pitfalls, and naming mainstream or specialist placements, including EOTAS and SEND Tribunal appeal scope

The principal statute governing Education, Health and Care (EHC) plans is the Children and Families Act 2014 (CFA 2014). Sections 36–51 of the CFA 2014 cover EHC needs assessments and EHC plans. These provisions are supplemented by: the Special Educational Needs and Disability Code of Practice (COP), Chapter 9; the Special Educational Needs and Disability Regulations 2014, SI 2014/1530; and case law from 2014 onwards, in which the Upper Tribunal and other courts have interpreted the legislation, the regulations and the COP, and how they interrelate. This Practice Note concentrates on the rules for EHC needs assessments and the format and content of EHC plans. For guidance on who may request an EHC assessment and the factors local authorities (LAs) must consider when deciding whether an EHC assessment is required, see Practice Note: When must a local authority carry out an EHC needs assessment? For further reading on matters concerning EHC needs assessments and EHC plans for young people over 19, see Practice Note: Post-19 education for young people with...

Read More Right Arrow