Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“In some areas of research there were also significant time savings. You get to what you are looking for more quickly, which all goes to the value of the product.”

Harper Mcleod

Access all documents on Maintenance pending suit

Maintenance pending suit meaning

/ˈmeɪnt(ə)nəns,ˈmeɪntɪnəns/ /ˈpɛndɪŋ/ /suːt/
Published by a LexisNexis Family expert
What does Maintenance pending suit mean?
Interim spousal maintenance ordered to cover a party’s immediate living expenses while divorce, dissolution, nullity or judicial separation proceedings are ongoing, until a final financial remedy order is made. It is a temporary periodical payments order, commonly called maintenance pending suit (MPS), and is typically assessed on a summary basis by reference to needs and the payer’s ability to pay. In England and Wales, MPS is a statutory remedy under section 22 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (with equivalent provision for civil partners under the Civil Partnership Act 2004). Northern Ireland has comparable powers under the Matrimonial Causes (Northern Ireland) Order 1978. In Ireland, courts may make interim maintenance orders under the Family Law (Maintenance of Spouses and Children) Act 1976 and related legislation; the expression “maintenance pending suit” is descriptive rather than the usual statutory label. In Scotland, the equivalent is interim aliment or interim periodical allowance under the Family Law (Scotland) Act 1985; the term “maintenance pending suit” is not used. Key features: short-term periodical payments; intended to prevent hardship and preserve the status quo; usually commence from the date of application; variable or dischargeable on change of circumstances; and distinct from child maintenance, which is dealt with under...
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Maintenance pending suit

NEWS
Family law weekly update: CA reverses judges’ anonymity; neurodiversity guidance; rulings on international adoption/abduction; child support reasoning; MPS/LSPO; OPRC remit, pathfinder funding and mediation vouchers—England and Wales

In this issue: Practice and procedure Private children International children Financial provision LexTalk®Family: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts New content Updated content New Q&As Useful information Practice and procedure Family court judges’ anonymisation reversed by Court of Appeal (Tickle & Summers v BBC and others) UK media coverage remains centred on the killing of ten-year-old Sara Sharif by her father and step-mother. In its aftermath, reporters Louise Tickle and Hannah Summers, together with leading news organisations, applied for disclosure of materials and information from earlier Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989) proceedings relating to Sara and her brothers and sisters, seeking, among other things, the identities of the judges involved. Although none of those judges had asked to remain anonymous, Mr Justice Williams’ disclosure order nevertheless barred publication of their names. In Tickle & Summers v BBC and others [2025] EWCA Civ 42, the Court of Appeal allowed the challenges to...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
England and Wales family law weekly: children (public, private, abduction), financial remedies and transparency case law; HMCTS divorce and FRC process updates — 13 February 2025

In this issue: Practice and procedure Relationship breakdown Public children Private children Financial provision International children Daily and weekly news alerts Updated content Useful information Practice and procedure Family Justice Council Bridget Lindley memorial lecture HHJ Khatun Sapnara will deliver the Bridget Lindley memorial lecture on 12 March 2025. This online lecture forms part of the Family Justice Council’s annual interdisciplinary conference, taking place in Birmingham. The theme this year is ‘Diversity and Inclusion in the Family Justice System: Promoting Best Practice in Decision Making’... Relationship breakdown HMCTS adds ability for a solicitor to remove themselves as representing a party in divorce applications HM Courts and Tribunals Service has enabled MyHMCTS to let a solicitor end their representation in divorce matters. Choose ‘stop representing client’ from the next step drop-down to use the feature, which launched on 10 February 2025. Proceed with care: once submitted, access ends immediately and the case...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Family law weekly update: key rulings on parental responsibility, expert evidence, financial remedies and international children; Domestic Abuse Act pilot extended; procedural updates on HMCTS portal and UTAAC open justice

In this issue: Practice and procedure Domestic abuse Private children Public children Financial provision International children Daily and weekly news alerts New content Updated content Useful information Practice and procedure Professional negligence and limitation—the roll of impecuniosity in constructive knowledge (Kay v Martineau Johnson) In Kay v Martineau Johnson (A firm) [2026] EWCA Civ 224, the Court of Appeal examined how actual and constructive knowledge should be approached in claims against solicitors for professional negligence. It also addressed whether a lack of means is pertinent when assessing reasonable steps, including seeking expert opinion, for determining the date of knowledge. James Davies, barrister and Mediator at New Square Chambers, explores the practical consequences in Professional negligence and limitation—the roll of impecuniosity in constructive knowledge (Kay v Martineau Johnson)... Domestic abuse Domestic Abuse Act 2021 (Commencement No 6, 8 and 9 and Saving Provisions) (Amendment) Regulations 2026 The Domestic Abuse Act 2021...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Maintenance pending suit

PRACTICE NOTES
Maintenance Pending Suit (Outcome of Proceedings) and Interim Periodical Payments: Principles, Jurisdiction, Quantification, Procedure, Costs, Pre-existing Agreements, Backdating, Variation and Legal Services Orders (England and Wales)

This Practice Note This Practice Note outlines the general principles to bear in mind when applying for maintenance pending suit (MPS) under section 22 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) and Schedule 5, Part 8 to the Civil Partnership Act 2004 (CPA 2004), also known as maintenance pending outcome of proceedings. It offers direction on the scope and mechanics of such interim support, including: quantifying maintenance pending suit, duration and backdating, pre-existing agreements and refunds of payments. Core principles include that an MPS order cannot be made before the presentation of the application or petition for an order of divorce, dissolution, nullity or (judicial) separation, and it must terminate on determination of the proceedings, in most cases the date of the final order/decree absolute. Nevertheless, the court may order ‘interim maintenance’ for the period thereafter, pending the conclusion of financial remedy proceedings. The court has power to require either party to make to the other such periodical payments...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Maintenance pending suit/outcome in matrimonial and civil partnership proceedings: applications, evidence, drafting and costs (England and Wales)

This Practice Note outlines the steps needed to obtain an order for maintenance pending suit (MPS) under section 22 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973), or an order for maintenance pending outcome of proceedings under Schedule 5, Part 8 to the Civil Partnership Act 2004 (CPA 2004). It sets out how to make the application, the supporting evidence required, and how the costs of an application is addressed. See also Practice Note: General principles for maintenance pending suit. Initial steps The process for seeking maintenance pending suit under the MCA 1973, and the corresponding route under the CPA 2004, is prescribed in the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010), SI 2010/2955, Parts 9 and 18. Represented parties must, subject to specified exceptions, issue and manage contested financial remedy applications online using MyHMCTS. Accordingly, where relevant, regard should be had to the guidance on submitting applications online, see Practice Note: Online applications for financial remedies. Form A contains a box enabling the applicant to request maintenance pending...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Interim Remedies in Family Proceedings under FPR 2010 Pt 20: Applications, Evidence, Without Notice Orders, Undertakings and Judicial Allocation (England and Wales)

This Practice Note sets out the process for obtaining an interim remedy under the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010), SI 2010/2955, Pt 20, covering jurisdictional questions, evidential requirements, applications made without notice, and undertakings. It also notes requirements as to evidence and addresses without notice applications. For the range of interim orders the court may make, see Practice Note: Interim orders under FPR 2010, Pt 20. Various forms of interim relief beyond those expressly mentioned in FPR 2010, SI 2010/2955, Pt 20 can be pursued within family proceedings. The omission of a particular remedy from FPR 2010, SI 2010/2955, Pt 20 does not limit the court’s existing authority to grant it. For further guidance on other common interim remedies, consult the following Practice Notes: Procedure for maintenance pending suit Funding—legal services orders and costs allowances Procedure for an application for a non-molestation order Procedure for an application for an occupation order Procedure Applications for interim remedies under FPR 2010,...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Q&As about Maintenance pending suit

Q&As
Costs orders against unsuccessful Legal Services Order applicants

A request for a legal services order constitutes an interim step, brought under the specified procedure in the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010), SI 2010/2955, Pt 18...

Read More Right Arrow