Powered by Lexis+®

Related Glossary Terms

CASE STUDY

“The forms and precedents section is essential so that I can quickly and easily look up provisions to include in templates or bespoke project contracts.”

RWE

Access all documents on Managing trustee

Managing trustee meaning

What does Managing trustee mean?
In practice, a managing trustee is a trustee who carries out the day-to-day management and administration of the trust, in contrast to a custodian trustee that holds legal title to the trust property and acts on the managing trustees’ directions. The term is descriptive rather than a defined statutory label, and is widely used in charity, church and community property trusts where title is vested in an official or corporate custodian or nominee. Key legal features include exercising decision-making and administration powers: managing trustees implement the trust purposes, make investment and distribution decisions, enter into contracts, maintain and insure assets, keep accounts and regulatory returns, and conduct or defend proceedings. They owe fiduciary duties, must act jointly unless the trust instrument provides otherwise, and may delegate functions to agents, nominees or custodians subject to the statutory duty of care (for example under the Trustee Act 2000 and the Trustee Act (Northern Ireland) 2001; similar principles apply in Scotland and Ireland). Where no custodian trustee is appointed, all trustees are, in effect, the managing trustees. Usage is broadly consistent across England and Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland. Statute in England and Wales recognises custodian trustees (for example the Public Trustee Act 1906),...
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Managing trustee

NEWS
Jersey Royal Court blesses trustee’s variation adding female beneficiaries to dynastic trusts, overriding male-line wishes: guidance on discriminatory clauses, public policy, human rights and Public Trustee v Cooper.

Representation of Zedra Trust Company (Suisse) SA re C and D Trusts [2023] JRC 213 What are the practical implications of this case Although resolved on its own facts, the court offered broadly useful guidance for trustees managing dynastic trusts intended to support multiple generations. As a family’s philosophy evolves, trustees should assess whether the trust still embodies that shift and, if not, consider whether substantive modifications are required. The ruling will interest practitioners as it confronts public policy and human rights considerations within the framework of trust deed provisions and settlors’ expressed wishes. It underlines that letters of wishes are not binding on trustees, and certainly not on the court, and demonstrates judicial backing for a trustee departing from a settlor’s clear wishes to prevent family discord, here arising from the exclusion of the female line from benefitting from the Trusts. In short, the decision encourages trustees of long‑running family trusts to think carefully about alignment with changing family...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Pensions law update: Spring Budget reforms; TPR general code and DB statement of strategy; HMRC LTA abolition guidance; PPF public sector consolidator; general levy increases; social factors guidance

In this issue: Spring Budget 2024 The Pensions Regulator Pensions taxation The Pension Protection Fund Investment Scheme governance Daily and weekly news alerts Dates for your diary Trackers Spring Budget 2024 Key pensions announcements and views from the market In the Spring Budget 2024, delivered on 6 March 2024, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, the Rt Hon Jeremy Hunt MP, outlined the government’s central objective: to stimulate growth by funnelling more capital into UK equity markets, improving the UK’s standing as a listing venue, and building on the Mansion House reforms announced in the Autumn Statement 2023. Key pensions measures include: expanding the regulatory remit of the Pensions Regulator (TPR) and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to enable the closure or winding-up of poorly performing defined contribution (DC) schemes, aligned with the reformed Value for Money (VFM) framework requiring DC funds to publish, by 2027, a public breakdown of...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Reinterpreting UK pension trustees’ fiduciary duties to manage systemic climate risk: LCP survey and Work and Pensions Committee inquiry highlight limits of compliance-only reporting

LCP reported that its yearly poll of scheme trustees also indicated that a significant cohort of pensions specialists firmly believes managing systemic climate threats should be part of a trustee’s responsibilities. The firm did not reveal how many people were surveyed, or when fieldwork took place, but said the complete annual survey will be released publicly in full in June 2024. Aaron Punwani, LCP chief executive, welcomed the fact that several schemes have adopted net-zero targets. However, Punwani urged an updated interpretation of trustees’ fiduciary duty, so they can consider climate risk over the long term...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Managing trustee

PRACTICE NOTES
Trustee governance of pension scheme administration: regulatory context, administration policies, appointing and monitoring administrators, service level agreements, core financial transactions, business continuity and digital transformation

Sound administration underpins the smooth operation of a pension scheme and the delivery of good member outcomes, not least because administrators are typically members’ first port of call; consequently, their effectiveness, consistency and accuracy indeed strongly influence member experience and results. In short, administration counts because it is the usual locus of pension governance, safeguarding data accuracy, regulatory compliance and correct member outcomes being delivered on a consistent basis. What is a scheme administrator? For the purposes of this Practice Note, ‘scheme administrator’ means the individual or entity that supports the scheme’s day-to-day running by planning, managing and performing its administrative tasks. This can be an external provider, a dedicated internal team within the employer and/or the employer’s human resources or finance functions and departments. This usage is different from the ‘scheme administrator’ in Part 4 of the Finance Act 2004 (FA 2004), denoting the person or persons who ensure the scheme meets FA 2004 requirements in full. In practice, that statutory capacity is...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Corporate separate personality: Salomon principle, veil piercing versus circumvention (concealment/evasion), and statutory routes to personal liability in insolvency, company, crime, pensions and employment contexts

This Practice Note explores the doctrine of separate legal personality for a registered company, and surveys the relevant case law addressing the narrow situations in which the corporate veil might be pierced. It also separates true piercing or lifting of the veil from the more routine instances in which the veil is sidestepped by reliance on another legal or equitable entitlement. The analysis underscores the limited nature of this intervention and the authorities that define it. Corporate legal personality—the Salomon principle A duly incorporated company is a person distinct from its members, holding its own rights and bearing its own liabilities as an independent legal subject. This rule, often called the corporate veil or the Salomon principle, was most famously articulated by Lord MacNaghten in Salomon v Salomon: the company, at law, is wholly separate from the subscribers to the memorandum; even if, after incorporation, the undertaking remains exactly as before, with the same individuals managing it and the same people receiving the profits, the company is not...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Managing section 75 employer debts on corporate transactions: triggers, calculation and options (payment, apportionment, withdrawal, deferred debt), trustee/TPR processes, notifiable events, restructuring risks and tax

THIS PRACTICE NOTE APPLIES IN RELATION TO DEFINED BENEFIT OCCUPATIONAL PENSION SCHEMES This Practice Note sets out approaches for addressing a section 75 debt in the context of a transaction, with particular emphasis on multi-employer schemes where a range of options may exist. It also outlines considerations connected to the Pensions Regulator's clearance process and the notifiable events regime. For trustee-focused considerations when deciding how a section 75 debt should be managed on an employment cessation event, see Practice Note: employment cessation events—trustee decision-making process. For matters specific to section 75 debts triggered during a group reorganisation, see Practice Note: Intra-group reorganisations and pensions. Determining whether a section 75 debt will be triggered Section 75 debt triggers A section 75 debt (often called an 'employer debt') may become payable by the employer of a defined benefit occupational pension scheme where: the scheme is a multi-employer arrangement and an employment cessation event occurs in relation to that employer (described in this Practice...

Read More Right Arrow