Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“Because of the pure breadth and depth of black letter law research and practical guidance that LexisNexis provides, we don't have to rely on counsel as much as perhaps firms that don't use LexisNexis.”

KaurMaxwell

Access all documents on Material adverse change (MAC) condition

Material adverse change (MAC) condition meaning

What does Material adverse change (MAC) condition mean?
In public takeovers, a material adverse change (MAC) condition is an offer condition that allows the bidder to let its offer lapse if, after announcement and before the offer becomes or is declared unconditional, the offeree’s business, assets, financial or trading position, or prospects deteriorate materially. The term is not defined in legislation; its operation is governed by the UK Takeover Code and, in Ireland, the Irish Takeover Rules. Under these regimes, MAC conditions must not normally be expressed in subjective terms, and a bidder may only invoke a MAC where the circumstances are of material significance to it in the context of the offer. The Takeover Panel applies this test strictly and the threshold is high; invocation is rare and bidders should consult the Panel both when drafting and before seeking to rely on a MAC. Typical drafting refers to adverse changes in the offeree’s business, assets, liabilities, financial or trading position, or prospects arising between announcement and closing. General market or industry movements, or changes already public at announcement, are unlikely to suffice. The approach is broadly consistent across England & Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland under the Code, and in Ireland under the Irish Takeover Rules.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Practice Notes about Material adverse change (MAC) condition

PRACTICE NOTES
Drafting, negotiating and invoking MAC/MAE provisions in facility agreements: definitions, qualifications, events of default, drawstops, acceleration and UK case law

The concepts of material adverse change (MAC) and material adverse effect (MAE) are deployed in distinct yet connected ways in a standard facility agreement. Material adverse effect Facility agreements typically include a defined term for material adverse effect. Its primary function is to qualify specified representations, undertakings and events of default. Material adverse change A material adverse change in the borrower’s circumstances is often treated as a separate event of default. This provision is routinely the subject of heavy negotiation, with variations in scope. A common formulation links the MAC event of default back to the MAE definition. The borrower is also required to represent—sometimes on a repeating basis—that no material adverse change has occurred to its business or financial condition since the date of the most recent financial statements delivered to the lender. The drafting of the material adverse effect definition determines both the reach of the qualifications applied to the relevant representations, undertakings and events of default, and what will constitute the MAC...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Material adverse change clauses in finance: leading cases on interpretation, materiality, financial condition and acceleration

This Practice Note summarises notable cases and related materials concerning material adverse change clauses (MAC) in a financing context. The cases are arranged by theme and cover: interpreting a MAC clause acceleration based on a MAC clause Interpreting a MAC clause Names of parties: BM Brazil I Fundo De Investimento EM Participacoes Multistrategia v Sibanye BM Brazil (Pty) Limited [2024] EWHC 2566 (Comm) Judgment date: 10 October 2024 Case summary: Following drilling that triggered a blast, a mine slope in Brazil shifted by up to two metres, with the ground moving as a single block. The central issue was whether this amounted to a ‘material adverse effect’ under the definition in the share purchase agreement for the company owning the mine, allowing the buyer to withdraw. Butcher J concluded it was not a ‘material adverse event’ because, in the context of the acquisition, the change was not material. To reach that conclusion, he relied on expert valuation evidence...

Read More Right Arrow