“It really is saving us a huge number of hours over the days, weeks and months. Having more relevant support at hand, not having to draft or review documents them from scratch - it all adds up.”
Southampton FCAccess all documents on Matrimonial home
Assistance with the checklist This summary checklist and timeline presuppose that the trustee in bankruptcy (trustee) is ready to file an application to the court for an order for possession and sale of a property in which the bankrupt previously held an interest that now vests in the trustee under section 306 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986). It also assumes the trustee has written to the owners to try to realise their interest without issuing court proceedings, and that it is the appropriate moment to make the application. If the property is of a type within IA 1986, s 283A(1), then unless the trustee takes certain steps before the third anniversary of the bankruptcy order—among them applying to court for a possession and sale order—the trustee’s interest in that property will automatically re-vest in the bankrupt. Accordingly, the trustee must take timely steps in relation to the property...
A v N (R intervening) [2025] EWFC 371 (B) What was the background? The applicant wife (W) and the respondent husband (H) wed in March 1996 after living together for two years, amounting to a near three-decade marriage when the cohabitation is counted. The intervenor was W’s mother (R). The parties had five children; only the youngest, T, now aged 15, remains under 18, although several of the older children have continued to reside in the family property. The former matrimonial home (FMH) was acquired on 13 February 2012 in H and W’s joint names. It was accepted by both that the purchase would not have been possible without funds from R, and that from the outset the plan was for R to share the FMH with them. The completion statement recorded a £130,000 contribution from R towards the £881,161 price, described as a ‘mother gifted deposit’. The chosen property was specifically selected so that semi-independent accommodation could be constructed for R’s eventual occupation, identified in the judgment as...
In this issue: Practice and procedure Relationship breakdown Financial provision Private children Public children International children Enforcement Daily and weekly news alerts Updated content Useful information Practice and procedure Family Procedure Rule Committee meeting minutes The Family Procedure Rule Committee has published the official minutes of its meeting held on 9 December 2024. Arbitration Bill approved and now pending Royal Assent The UK Parliament has completed its consideration of the Arbitration Bill in full. Scrutiny by the committee of the whole House of Commons resulted in no amendments whatsoever. Thereafter, the Bill received its third reading and passed without alteration. The Arbitration Bill now formally awaits Royal Assent. See: LNB News 12/02/2025 46. Relationship breakdown Existence of a marriage (Ms Z v Mr Z) In Ms Z v Mr Z [2025] EWHC 276 (Fam), the parties were married in accordance with Islamic customs on 4 August 1999. They...
Pillmoor (as trustee of the bankruptcy estate of Mohammed Erfan Miah) v Miah and another [2019] EWHC 3696 (Ch), [2019] All ER (D) 211 (Oct) What are the practical implications of this case? This decision offers practical direction on claims where one spouse seeks a beneficial stake in a property not held in their legal name. The judgment clarified the threshold for proving a common intention constructive trust, identifying what will, and will not, suffice. The party asserting the interest must adduce evidence of either an explicit arrangement to share the beneficial ownership, or facts from which such an accord can properly be inferred. Accordingly, proof should address matters that bore on ownership and family finances, including: discussions between the spouses that touched on the question of ownership; the role each spouse played in the household’s financial decision-making; how the finances were organised. If the evidential position remains uncertain, that ambiguity is liable to be resolved against the claiming spouse. These...
This Practice Note reviews the factors the court will take into account and the test it will adopt when considering an application by a trustee in bankruptcy (the trustee) seeking orders for possession and sale of the bankrupt’s home, including accommodation occupied by the bankrupt’s family... For further reading on making possession and sale applications and on the timing of any application, see Practice Notes: Possession and sale applications in respect of a bankrupt’s family home The ‘three-year rule’ in bankruptcy under section 283A of the Insolvency Act 1986 Applications for possession and sale of the family home Where a trustee applies to the court for possession and sale, they will, amongst other things, need both an order for sale and an order for vacant possession. In substance this is a two-stage exercise, yet, in practice, it is usually addressed within a single application. If the property is jointly owned, section 14 of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees...
Total intestacy A total intestacy arises where none of the deceased’s estate is effectively disposed of because: no Will was made a Will was made but is invalid the Will was revoked the Will includes no disposition of the estate the Will, though valid, is ineffective, for example where the sole beneficiary died before the deceased Intestacy rules applicable on total intestacy If the deceased died intestate, Parts III and IV of the Administration of Estates Act 1925 (AEA 1925) govern: all movable property of an intestate domiciled in England and Wales, wherever that property is located all immovable property situated in England or Wales, regardless of the deceased’s domicile The intestacy provisions apply to the residuary estate not otherwise disposed of, meaning what remains once all debts are settled and any valid legacies carried out. They operate only over property that could have been the subject of a Will had...
Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 (MFPA 1984) permits former spouses divorced abroad, with a sufficient nexus to England and Wales, to seek financial relief within this jurisdiction where a foreign tribunal has made no, or no adequate, provision, thereby mitigating unfair outcomes. Equivalent rules apply on the dissolution of a civil partnership overseas (or an analogous status), via Schedule 7 to the Civil Partnership Act 2004 (CPA 2004). This Practice Note explains when the courts of England and Wales may make financial orders under MFPA 1984, Pt III and CPA 2004, Sch 7. It also outlines how the court deals with applications for permission (leave), the matters it will weigh, and the spectrum of orders it can make. See also the Practice Notes: Financial relief after overseas divorce—court’s approach and case law, and Financial relief after overseas divorce—procedure. Who may apply? ...
This formal letter serves hereby to notify the bankrupt and any additional co-owner (or occupier) of the relevant property in question that the trustee in bankruptcy (the trustee) intends to realise their beneficial interest in that property. It should generally be sent only once the trustee has resolved to formally issue a court application for possession and sale, or adapted suitably if they do not propose to apply to the court at this stage. Individual letters must be addressed and posted separately to all co-owners/occupiers, ensuring the trustee can be fully confident each has been clearly notified of the position. The precedent is written in neutral terms so as to allow easy adaptation and appropriate modification where required, and is framed on the basis that it is to be sent by the trustee’s solicitor...
VAR Insolvency Act Application Notice Note: This precedent should be used in conjunction with an application notice template complying with the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016, SI 2016/1024—refer to: (Form IAA) IR 2016, r 1.35 Court Reference No: [ INSERT COURT REF ]...
Key points A client’s domicile largely determines the law that will regulate succession to their estate. While domicile can be altered, it calls for meticulous planning and is best tackled as early as possible. Whether the client should have a single Will, separate Wills for each jurisdiction with which they are connected, or no Will at all, depends on their full circumstances. Seek guidance from qualified practitioners in every jurisdiction where the client has property or family connections. Keep arrangements under regular review, especially whenever the client’s circumstances change. Domicile Domicile is a legal status, often described as a form of personal law, that ties an individual to the legal system of a particular jurisdiction. It is distinct from residence or nationality, although those factors may assist in determining domicile. A person is commonly domiciled where they maintain a permanent home, though not invariably. Changing domicile is possible, but the individual must be able to demonstrate any change with clear...
No statute sets out what counts as a non-matrimonial asset, yet case law has long examined and refined the line between these items and property included within the marital acquest during divorce proceedings. An interest a spouse obtains during the marriage in a parent’s home can be treated as comparable to an inheritance and, for the purposes of classification in financial remedy claims and outcomes, viewed as non-matrimonial. Such an interest might indeed effectively amount to a lifetime gift or a pre-death inheritance...
Personal service of a divorce petition It is inferred that this Q&A concerns personal service of a divorce petition, given the mention of the ‘petitioner’. As a starting point, a divorce petition is commonly served on the respondent by first class post. That said, Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010), SI 2010/2955, 6.4 permits service of a divorce petition by other means, namely: personal service pursuant to FPR 2010, SI 2010/2955, 6.7 alternative service providing delivery on the next business day under FPR 2010, PD 6A where FPR 2010, SI 2010/2955, 6.11 applies (the respondent has a solicitor acting and the applicant has written notice that the solicitor is instructed to accept service of the application), service via document exchange (DX) See Practice Note: Service of applications for matrimonial and civil partnership orders within the jurisdiction...