Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“In some areas of research there were also significant time savings. You get to what you are looking for more quickly, which all goes to the value of the product.”

Harper Mcleod

Access all documents on Mezzanine debt/finance

Mezzanine debt/finance meaning

What does Mezzanine debt/finance mean?
Mezzanine debt/finance is funding that sits between senior debt and equity in the capital structure, used to plug gaps in leveraged acquisitions, growth financings and real estate developments. In practice it ranks contractually and/or structurally below senior secured lenders but ahead of shareholders in any enforcement or insolvency waterfall. It is a descriptive market term rather than one defined by statute or case law. Its legal effect is created by subordination and intercreditor arrangements and by the security package. Key features commonly include: second-ranking (second-lien) or unsecured security; a later maturity than senior facilities; limited or blocked amortisation; cash and/or payment-in-kind (PIK) interest and fees; and, often, equity upside through warrants or similar equity kickers. Documentation may take the form of subordinated loan agreements or loan notes. Enforcement and payment rights are typically subject to standstill and payment-blockage provisions in an intercreditor agreement. The concept and usage are broadly consistent across England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland. While security forms differ (for example, Scottish fixed security is taken by standard security or assignation), priority and subordination principles are analogous. Providers are typically mezzanine or private credit funds.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Mezzanine debt/finance

NEWS
Banking and finance litigation: May 2025 England and Wales decisions on DCM listing failures, valuation negligence, forged charges, Building Safety Act limitation, forum non conveniens, marshalling and foreign judgment enforcement

Banking & Finance—May 2025 case round-up Nationwide Building Society v The Bank of New York Mellon, London Branch and another company [2025] EWHC 1046 (Comm) Debt capital markets—notes not admitted to listing Nationwide issued proceedings against its solicitors, A&O Shearman (A&O), claiming an approximate £83m tax detriment flowing from the omission to list notes, as pleaded by Nationwide. A&O, in response, pursued a contribution from BNY Mellon (BNY), contending that BNY contributed to the non-listing. The central point was whether a signing and closing agenda (normally a process checklist) could impose a binding duty on BNY to confirm that the notes were listed. The Commercial Court refused BNY’s application for summary judgment, concluding that A&O’s case had a realistic prospect of success at this stage. It determined that whether the transaction suite, including the agenda, created enforceable commitments required a fuller factual inquiry at trial. Skykomish Ltd v Gerald Eve LLP [2025] EWHC 1031 (Ch) Mezzanine financing and profit share—property development—purpose-built student accommodation—valuation of property—professional...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Mezzanine debt/finance

PRACTICE NOTES
Debt Layering and Priority in Leveraged Finance for Restructuring Lawyers: Super Senior, Senior, Unitranche, Second Lien, Mezzanine and Junior Debt—Intercreditor Controls, Standstills and Waterfalls

Borrowers can choose from a broad range of debt and capital structuring routes. Traditionally, senior debt (typically provided by banks) sat at the top, then mezzanine finance, followed by junior debt, each ranking ahead of unsecured creditors and shareholders/equity holders. After the 2007/8 credit crunch, businesses increasingly tapped capital markets and non-bank sources (eg private credit) to widen their funding, adding further layers of indebtedness. This Practice Note offers a straightforward overview of the different tiers of debt and security a restructuring lawyer may encounter. It outlines the financing layers and the forms of security commonly seen in practice by a restructuring lawyer. It also sketches how those tiers now sit together in practice. Capital structures and interplay between creditors Typically, external borrowings sit at the operating company (Opco) level. The Opcos own the core business assets (eg premises, key manufacturing equipment and valuable intellectual property), produce most of the profits, and lenders seek security over those assets. In some arrangements, high-value items such as intellectual property or...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
European leveraged finance intercreditor rights: comparative table—mezzanine, second lien and senior subordinated notes

This table provides a concise overview of typical negotiated outcomes across a range of intercreditor topics, flagging the principal areas where junior creditors’ rights converge or diverge depending on the junior debt instrument; is drawn from documentation in the upper mid‑market and large capitalisation segments of the European leveraged finance market; assumes a second lien facility is documented separately from the senior debt and votes as an independent creditor class. Intercreditor rights may differ because of (among other factors): transaction‑specific structural features; whether the debt is distributed in Europe or the US; documentary requirements of particular investors (especially where junior debt is pre‑placed); and whether a junior creditor has actively negotiated its rights, or they appear in an evergreen intercreditor agreed solely between the sponsor and senior creditors. For further detail on the topics covered in this table, see Practice Notes: Introductory guide to Intercreditor Agreements Intercreditor agreements—effective releases...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Commercial real estate finance: flexible senior (accordion/hunting), stretched senior, mezzanine and preferred equity structures, with intercreditor dynamics and lender controls

Flexible loan structures In the wake of the financial crisis, mainstream bank lending pulled back, creating space for non-bank lenders (NBLs) such as insurers and real estate debt funds. Through 2012 and 2013, this gap allowed NBLs to consolidate their position and become established market participants. With confidence returning to the real estate investment market and banks re-entering from 2014, some NBLs, especially real estate debt funds, shifted up the risk spectrum away from the senior debt arena. This has produced a competitive environment for real estate debt across the capital stack. Banks, insurers and debt funds adopt different approaches, each targeting an optimum deal size, asset class and loan purpose. Four often-used flexible loan structures are: flexible senior loans stretched senior loans mezzanine loans preferred equity loans Flexible senior loans Banks are particularly active in this space alongside some insurers, although senior facilities have typically been provided at conservative loan-to-value, loan-to-gross development value and loan-to-cost ratios. Real estate...

Read More Right Arrow