Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“It's hard to quantify, right now. But at a guess, I'd say it's probably more than 50% faster, at times. It's literally that quick. We've found to be an essential practical tool. We're very satisfied.”

Walsall Council

Access all documents on Mezzanine financing

Mezzanine financing meaning

What does Mezzanine financing mean?
Mezzanine financing describes the layer of funding that bridges the gap between senior secured debt and equity in leveraged buyouts, acquisitions, real estate and growth capital deals. It is a market term, not defined by legislation or case law; its legal effect arises from contractual and structural subordination and the agreed security and intercreditor arrangements. Typically structured as subordinated loan notes or term loans (unsecured or second‑lien), mezzanine debt ranks behind senior lenders on enforcement and in the insolvency waterfall. Reflecting its higher risk, pricing is higher than senior bank debt and may include payment‑in‑kind (PIK) interest, fees and prepayment premia. Equity participation is often included through warrants or options (an equity kicker), and some structures use convertibles or preference shares. Ranking and remedies are governed by intercreditor or subordination agreements (payment blockages, standstills and turnover of recoveries). Maturity usually falls after the senior facilities; covenants are commonly looser and more incurrence‑based. Usage is broadly consistent across England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland. However, the creation, perfection and priority of security (including second‑ranking and floating charges) and enforcement mechanics depend on local company, security and insolvency law, with requisite filings and registrations made at Companies House or the Companies Registration...
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Mezzanine financing

NEWS
Banking and finance litigation: May 2025 England and Wales decisions on DCM listing failures, valuation negligence, forged charges, Building Safety Act limitation, forum non conveniens, marshalling and foreign judgment enforcement

Banking & Finance—May 2025 case round-up Nationwide Building Society v The Bank of New York Mellon, London Branch and another company [2025] EWHC 1046 (Comm) Debt capital markets—notes not admitted to listing Nationwide issued proceedings against its solicitors, A&O Shearman (A&O), claiming an approximate £83m tax detriment flowing from the omission to list notes, as pleaded by Nationwide. A&O, in response, pursued a contribution from BNY Mellon (BNY), contending that BNY contributed to the non-listing. The central point was whether a signing and closing agenda (normally a process checklist) could impose a binding duty on BNY to confirm that the notes were listed. The Commercial Court refused BNY’s application for summary judgment, concluding that A&O’s case had a realistic prospect of success at this stage. It determined that whether the transaction suite, including the agenda, created enforceable commitments required a fuller factual inquiry at trial. Skykomish Ltd v Gerald Eve LLP [2025] EWHC 1031 (Ch) Mezzanine financing and profit share—property development—purpose-built student accommodation—valuation of property—professional...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Mezzanine financing

PRACTICE NOTES
Debt Layering and Priority in Leveraged Finance for Restructuring Lawyers: Super Senior, Senior, Unitranche, Second Lien, Mezzanine and Junior Debt—Intercreditor Controls, Standstills and Waterfalls

Borrowers can choose from a broad range of debt and capital structuring routes. Traditionally, senior debt (typically provided by banks) sat at the top, then mezzanine finance, followed by junior debt, each ranking ahead of unsecured creditors and shareholders/equity holders. After the 2007/8 credit crunch, businesses increasingly tapped capital markets and non-bank sources (eg private credit) to widen their funding, adding further layers of indebtedness. This Practice Note offers a straightforward overview of the different tiers of debt and security a restructuring lawyer may encounter. It outlines the financing layers and the forms of security commonly seen in practice by a restructuring lawyer. It also sketches how those tiers now sit together in practice. Capital structures and interplay between creditors Typically, external borrowings sit at the operating company (Opco) level. The Opcos own the core business assets (eg premises, key manufacturing equipment and valuable intellectual property), produce most of the profits, and lenders seek security over those assets. In some arrangements, high-value items such as intellectual property or...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Commercial real estate finance: flexible senior (accordion/hunting), stretched senior, mezzanine and preferred equity structures, with intercreditor dynamics and lender controls

Flexible loan structures In the wake of the financial crisis, mainstream bank lending pulled back, creating space for non-bank lenders (NBLs) such as insurers and real estate debt funds. Through 2012 and 2013, this gap allowed NBLs to consolidate their position and become established market participants. With confidence returning to the real estate investment market and banks re-entering from 2014, some NBLs, especially real estate debt funds, shifted up the risk spectrum away from the senior debt arena. This has produced a competitive environment for real estate debt across the capital stack. Banks, insurers and debt funds adopt different approaches, each targeting an optimum deal size, asset class and loan purpose. Four often-used flexible loan structures are: flexible senior loans stretched senior loans mezzanine loans preferred equity loans Flexible senior loans Banks are particularly active in this space alongside some insurers, although senior facilities have typically been provided at conservative loan-to-value, loan-to-gross development value and loan-to-cost ratios. Real estate...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Guide to LMA leveraged finance precedents: term sheets, mandate and primary syndication documents, senior and super senior facilities, mezzanine drafting, intercreditor agreements, and RFR-based interest

Development of the Loan Market Association (LMA) documentation The initiative to create the LMA’s investment grade suite started in 1998, driven by market calls for a uniform syndicated facility agreement. The project emerged in response to market demand for a standardised syndicated facility agreement. Development of the LMA’s leveraged materials followed a comparable path: an initial facility agreement for leveraged acquisition finance transactions was released in 2004, with the recommended Intercreditor Agreement for leveraged acquisition finance (senior and mezzanine) issued in 2009. Since then, the LMA has continued to issue further precedents to reflect demand and changes in the market. There are now standard forms available for deals involving senior secured notes. In addition, there are forms for structures that feature both senior secured notes and high yield notes, recognising the significant volume of transactions financed in part or in full through high yield debt. The purpose behind both sets of LMA standard forms is to save time and cost by offering a position that reflects prevailing market practice...

Read More Right Arrow