Powered by Lexis+®
CASE STUDY

“LexisPSL and the other Lexis solutions support our business in exactly the way we want. They enable us to quickly turn around work and deliver the best possible service to our clients.”

SBP Law

Access all documents on MINT

MINT meaning

What does MINT mean?
In legal practice, MINT is a market shorthand for work relating to the emerging economies of Mexico, Indonesia, Nigeria and Türkiye (Turkey). It is not defined in legislation or case law and has no independent legal effect; it is a descriptive expression used across transactional, regulatory and disputes contexts to group these jurisdictions for comparative analysis. Lawyers may see MINT in client briefings, due diligence, and occasionally in contracts (for example, to describe a target market). Any operative drafting should name each country individually to avoid ambiguity. Typical legal considerations in MINT-related matters include governing law and dispute resolution choices, sanctions and export controls (UK and EU regimes), anti-bribery and corruption compliance, foreign investment and merger control, currency restrictions, tax exposure, and recognition and enforcement of judgments or arbitral awards. Usage and meaning are broadly consistent across England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland. The label does not imply shared legal systems or harmonised regulation; each country requires separate local law advice and risk assessment. For UK and Irish practitioners, apply jurisdiction-specific screening and compliance requirements before structuring cross-border transactions or enforcement strategies involving MINT markets.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about MINT

NEWS
UK public law update: Budget 2024, Brexit litigation, Windsor Framework consent, SIs, judicial review and HRA, Ministerial Code, scrutiny, ICO on Data (Use and Access) Bill (7 November 2024)

In this issue: Autumn Budget 2024 Brexit highlights Brexit SIs Subsidy control and State aid Judicial review Equality and human rights Constitutional and administrative law Information law Other Public law news LexTalk®Public Law: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers New Q&As Useful information Autumn Budget 2024 Bar Council responds to Autumn Budget 2024 The Bar Council has issued its reaction to the Autumn Budget, praising the ‘overall settlement for justice’. The settlement sets a departmental expenditure limit of £13.8bn for 2025–2026 for the Ministry of Justice. The Bar Council’s Chair, Sam Townend, welcomed the uplift, describing it as an overdue move towards treating justice as a core public service. He nevertheless cautioned that the sector remains far from recovery, pointing to a 20% real-terms per person cut in justice funding since 2010. To move beyond crisis...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK employment law weekly: belief discrimination, tips allocation code, EAT appeal deadlines, CPR changes, whistleblowing, ESG due diligence, devolved updates, pay and LPC remit—1 August 2024

In this issue: Prohibited conduct (discrimination etc) ESG and sustainability: employment issues Status and worker categories Employment contract Pay Whistleblowing Employment Tribunals/Employment Appeal Tribunal Civil courts Scottish, Welsh and Northern Ireland Materials LexTalk®Employment: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts Dates for your diary Trackers New Q&As Prohibited conduct (discrimination etc) Complaint by LGBT charity about ‘gender critical’ tweets did not induce or cause chambers’ discrimination of barrister In Bailey v Stonewall Equality Ltd [2024] EAT 119, the Employment Appeal Tribunal confirmed an employment tribunal had not erred in dismissing a barrister’s complaint, based on her gender critical beliefs, that Stonewall, an LGBT campaigning charity, had caused or encouraged her chambers to discriminate against her, contrary to section 111 of the Equality Act 2010. The tribunal considered the charity’s approach to be a protest, lacking any specific objective beyond, perhaps, publicly distancing the chambers from the barrister’s...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK Public Law Weekly: judicial review-terrorism reporting; ILR policy error; Aarhus costs; NSIP appeal deadlines; FOI contempt and COVID legal advice disclosure; EHRC code; TCA/State aid updates

In this issue: Brexit headlines Judicial review Equality and human rights Constitutional and administrative law Subsidy control and State aid Information law Other Public Law news Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Useful information Brexit headlines Weekly digest of EU–UK TCA Specialised Committees’ publications-27 May 2026 This digest outlines the outputs published by the Specialised Committees created under the EU–UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) for the week 20–26 May 2026. See: LNB News 27/05/2026 8. Judicial review Residents opposing construction of the new Chinese embassy refused costs protection under CPR 46.24(2)(a) and the Aarhus Convention-R (Royal Mint Court Residents’ Association) v Secretary of State, MHCLG The High Court ruled that a challenge to national security mitigation tied to the proposed Chinese embassy did not attract Aarhus costs protection under CPR 46.24(2)(a). Relying on HM Treasury v Global Feedback Ltd...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about MINT

PRACTICE NOTES
Comprehensive glossary of UK restructuring and insolvency terms, covering Companies Act schemes, Part 26A plans, IA 1986 processes, and cross‑border concepts including COMI, UNCITRAL and assimilated EU rules.

This glossary sets out numerous expressions regularly encountered in the restructuring & insolvency sphere. Words shown in bold within definitions are themselves explained in other entries in this glossary as well. A Article X The MLIJ contains a single provision named Article X, aimed at jurisdictions that have already implemented the MLCBI, like England, or are weighing its adoption. Article X states: ‘Not withstanding any prior interpretation to the contrary, the relief available under [insert a cross-reference to the legislation of this State enacting Article 21 of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency] includes recognition and enforcement of a judgment’ (see Practice Note: UNCITRAL model law on recognition and enforcement of insolvency-related judgments (MLIJ): Article X). Asset-backed security (ABS) A form of security anchored by asset pools, for example loans, leases, and credit card receivables. Assimilated law From 1 January 2024, ‘retained law’ has been retitled ‘assimilated law’. The body of domestic law originally arising from EU obligations, created by the European...

Read More Right Arrow