“What I spend on my yearly subscription, equals to a day's billable hours for me not to mention time efficiency and peace of mind.”
Jai SternAccess all documents on Net contribution clause
Court of Appeal—professional negligence ARCHIVED : This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained. The Court of Appeal upheld an appeal in a claim against solicitors, holding that the loss of a chance head of damage was too remote. At first instance, the judge concluded that Lewis Silkin LLP had fallen below the required standard by not advising their client to include a jurisdiction provision in his employment agreement with a franchisee involved in the Indian Premier League’s Twenty20 competition. Because no jurisdiction clause appeared in the contract, when the client later issued proceedings against the franchisee over a severance entitlement, he faced jurisdictional challenges (ultimately dismissed) brought by the franchisee, which postponed his obtaining judgment for £10 million in severance. The client’s case was that, with proper advice on jurisdiction, the contract would have contained an exclusive jurisdiction clause. On that footing, he said, he would have secured judgment for the severance sum sooner (as there would have been no hold‑ups arising from jurisdiction objections) and...
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Named sub-contractor A sub-contractor designated by the employer within the specification or the employer’s requirements. The contractor assumes responsibility for the named sub-contractor’s procurement and design risks (as opposed to the position regarding nominated sub-contractors). See Practice Note: Sub-contracting in construction projects (Types of sub-contractors). NEC3/NEC4 The NEC contracts foster a collaborative ethos and are apt for procuring a broad range of works. The NEC3 suite was first released in 2005, and a later edition followed in 2013...
This Practice Note explores net contribution clauses—also termed proportional or proportionate liability clauses—and their use in collateral warranties and consultants’ appointments. It explains why consultants, some contractors, and their professional indemnity insurers frequently press for a net contribution clause to be inserted into such warranties and appointments, and why employers are often reluctant to accept them. It further reviews the ability to claim a contribution from others under the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 where no net contribution clause is in place. It also considers case law concerning the effectiveness and enforceability of net contribution clauses. For suggested written guidance to provide to clients on net contribution clauses, see also Precedent: Advice to clients—Net Contribution clauses. What is a net contribution clause? In modern construction projects, multiple parties are typically engaged to contribute to the design process. If that design is subsequently found to be defective, this can make it challenging to apportion responsibility for the defects and to recover the resulting losses...