Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Related Glossary Terms

CASE STUDY

“In some areas of research there were also significant time savings. You get to what you are looking for more quickly, which all goes to the value of the product.”

Harper Mcleod

Access all documents on One stop shop

One stop shop meaning

What does One stop shop mean?
One stop shop describes the practical benefit in eu merger control of making a single notification to the European Commission to obtain merger clearance for a concentration with an EU dimension, avoiding parallel filings to EU Member State authorities. The phrase is descriptive, not a defined statutory term, and reflects the jurisdictional allocation in the EU Merger Regulation (Regulation 139/2004), which gives the Commission primary competence over such transactions. The one stop shop is not absolute. Referral mechanisms can reallocate jurisdiction: downwards to a Member State (Articles 4(4) and 9) or upwards to the Commission, including where no national filing is required (Articles 4(5) and 22). Parties should assess turnover thresholds, likely effects, and referral risk at the outset when planning notifications, timetables and conditions precedent. Jurisdictional position for the UK and Ireland: - United Kingdom: Post‑Brexit, the EU one stop shop does not cover the UK. Deals meeting UK thresholds may require separate review by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), alongside any European Commission process. - Ireland: As an EU Member State, Ireland participates in the one stop shop. Where the Commission has jurisdiction, the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC) will not review, unless a case is referred.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Checklists about One stop shop

CHECKLISTS
Notices to quit in Scottish commercial leases: preventing tacit relocation—timing and calculation of notice periods, service, parties, subtenants and form (practitioner checklist)

Checklist This Checklist outlines how to serve notices to quit aimed at preventing tacit relocation in commercial leases in Scotland. It covers: Who may serve a notice to quit; When it must be given; and How service should be effected. It does not address notices to quit for residential or agricultural property, nor does it cover the particular protection afforded to shop tenants under the Tenancy of Shops (Scotland) Act 1949 (see Practice Note: Protection for shop tenants), which are outside the scope of this Checklist and are not considered here. In Scotland, the principle of tacit relocation provides that a commercial lease will not end on the stated contractual expiry date but will continue, unless one of the parties serves a notice to quit in good time to bring it to an end at that date and then follows through by acting on the notice, or the tenant separately confirms it will vacate on the specified termination date. The notice...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related News about One stop shop

NEWS
UK and EU commercial law weekly: CMA green claims guidance, Brexit assimilated law pause, Dandara v Medway, HMRC customs, GB labelling, EUDR delay, Cyber Security Bill

In this issue: Advertising, marketing and sponsorship Brexit Contracts International Sale and supply of goods Supplier management Supply of services LexTalk®Commercial: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Advertising, marketing and sponsorship The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has released a practical compliance guide (the Guidance) on environmental claims for fashion brands, drawing on the principles in its Green Claims Code (the Code). It has also encouraged 17 fashion brands to revisit their green claims in light of the Guidance. In their article, Nigel Parr, partner, Christopher Eberhardt, counsel, and Olivia Spong, associate, at Ashurst, set out the main insights from the Guidance and consider the potential consequences for businesses both inside and beyond the fashion industry, including effects on internal procedures and engagement across supply chains. See News Analysis: CMA publishes guidance on environmental claims in the fashion sector. ASA rulings—2...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK and EU information law highlights: DUAA 2025 consequential regulations; ICO ADM/profiling consultation; EDPB legitimate interest digest; European Parliament rejects ePrivacy derogation; DESNZ/Ofgem energy cyber resilience reforms

In this issue: Data protection ePrivacy Cybersecurity Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Data protection Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provision) Regulations 2026 SI 2026/386: These Regulations amend 39 pieces of UK primary legislation, 16 pieces of UK secondary legislation, and five pieces of assimilated direct legislation concerning data protection. They introduce a range of changes arising from sections 117, 118 and 119(1) of the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 (DUAA 2025). Made under the DUAA 2025 in relation to assimilated law, they commence partly before DUAA 2025, s 119 is fully in force, and take full effect once DUAA 2025, s 119 (transfer of functions to the Information Commission) is wholly commenced. (Updated from draft on 31 March 2026.) See: LNB News 05/02/2026 22. EDPB publishes case digest on legitimate interest legal basis under EU GDPR The European Data Protection Board (EDPB) has issued a one-stop-shop...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Risk and Compliance: weekly legal and regulatory developments in data protection, sanctions, AML/CTF, economic crime and cybersecurity—25 January 2024

In this issue: Data protection Financial sanctions AML, CTF & counter-proliferation financing Other financial crime Cybersecurity Other Risk & Compliance updates this week Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Data protection EDPB adopts report with recommendations to strengthen role of DPOs The European Data Protection Board has approved a report presenting outcomes from its second co‑ordinated enforcement exercise, centred on the appointment and status of Data Protection Officers (DPOs). It highlights barriers DPOs face—such as non‑appointment and inadequate resourcing—and sets out recommendations to reinforce their independence and ensure access to the resources they need. See: LNB News 18/01/2024 22. EDPB publishes case digest on security of processing and data breach notification The European Data Protection Board has issued a one‑stop‑shop case digest on security of processing and data breach notification under Article 32 and Articles 33 and 34 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (EU GDPR). The digest sheds light...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about One stop shop

PRACTICE NOTES
EU GDPR: comprehensive guide to scope, lawful bases, roles, data subject rights, governance, DPOs, DPIAs, breach notification, international transfers, enforcement, sanctions, remedies, liability and ongoing compliance (EEA relevance)

FORTHCOMING CHANGE This Practice Note reflects the current legal position. Certain aspects will be affected by the Digital Omnibus proposals published on 19 November 2025 under the EU Commission’s ‘simplification’ agenda. For further detail, see Practice Note: EU Digital Omnibus—tracker. It introduces the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation, Regulation (EU) 2016/679—commonly called the GDPR and described here as the ‘EU GDPR’ to distinguish it from the UK GDPR. It summarises core concepts, regulatory supervision and organisational obligations under the EU GDPR, and ends with guidance on planning EU GDPR compliance activities. Introduction Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on protecting natural persons in relation to personal data processing and the free movement of such data, which repealed Directive 95/46/EC (the General Data Protection Regulation) (the EU GDPR), was published in the Official Journal of the EU on 4 May 2016. It entered into force on 24 May 2016 and became directly applicable...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
EU/EEA GDPR enforcement and sanctions: supervisory authorities' investigative and corrective powers, EDPB co-operation and one-stop shop, fines, compensation, criminal sanctions, procedural safeguards and judicial remedies

The EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2016/679) took direct effect and became fully enforceable across EU Member States on 25 May 2018. As the EU GDPR has been incorporated into the EEA Agreement and applies in every EEA country, references within it to EU Member States can generally be read as also covering EEA members. Enforcement under the EU GDPR has largely centred on elevating sanctions for breaches, with the expectation that tougher penalty provisions—particularly the higher administrative fines of up to the greater of 4% of worldwide annual turnover or €20m—will encourage stronger compliance. The Regulation also established the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) to promote a more uniform interpretation of the EU GDPR and the penalties issued under it. This Practice Note examines: the approach to sanctions and enforcement under the EU GDPR, including the role of the lead supervisory authority the role of the EDPB in seeking a more consistent application of the EU GDPR the role and powers...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
International merger control and FDI roundup—September/October 2020: Philippines thresholds, Indonesia guidance, Namibia reforms, gun-jumping fines, Austria/Brazil/US updates, UK one-stop-shop exit.

This month brings clarifications on the temporary uplift to notification thresholds in the Philippines, guidance in Indonesia on asset acquisitions, foreign-to-foreign deals and the simplified procedure, plus an extended consultation on proposed changes to Namibia’s merger control regime. We have also introduced a new topic focused on multi-jurisdictional FDI control. Philippines—notification thresholds increased for two years The Philippines Competition Commission (PCC) has issued rules explaining the application of the increased notification thresholds under the Bayanihan to Recover As One Act, which established a two-year exemption from notification where a transaction is below PHP 50bn. The PCC confirms that, until 15 September 2022, transactions must be notified to the PCC (with closing suspended pending clearance) where: at least one party (including ultimate parent entities) has either annual turnover in, into and from the Philippines or assets in the Philippines exceeding PHP 50bn (approx. €870.9m/US$1,026.6m), and the value of the transaction exceeds PHP 50bn (approx. €870.9m/US$1,026.6m) (ie the target has either annual turnover in, into...

Read More Right Arrow