“What I spend on my yearly subscription, equals to a day's billable hours for me not to mention time efficiency and peace of mind.”
Jai SternAccess all documents on Operator service provider
State aid General Court dismisses action relating to Commission’s decision approving compensation to Česká pošta for universal service obligations The General Court delivered its ruling in Case T-784/22, Zásilkovna v Commission, a challenge to the Commission’s decision of 25 July 2022, which concluded that compensation granted to Česká pošta by the Czech Republic for carrying out the universal postal service obligation for the years 2018-2022 was compatible with the internal market (SA.55208). The General Court rejected the action in full. By its ruling, the Court endorsed the Commission’s approval of the compensation measure. Background Česká pošta, the incumbent postal operator in the Czech Republic, has been designated as the country’s universal postal service provider. Under the universal service obligation (USO), Česká pošta is required, amongst other duties, to make available specified letter and parcel delivery services on each business day throughout the whole territory of the Czech Republic. The General Court upheld this decision on appeal. In January 2018, the Czech authorities pre-notified compensation intended for Česká...
In this issue: State aid LexTalk®Competition: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Caselex State aid State aid General Court dismisses action relating to Commission’s decision approving compensation to Česká pošta for universal service obligations The General Court delivered its ruling in Case T‑784/22, Zásilkovna v Commission, challenging the Commission’s decision of 25 July 2022, which held that compensation granted by the Czech Republic to Česká pošta for provision of the universal postal service obligation for 2018–2022 was compatible with the internal market (SA.55208). The General Court dismissed the application in its entirety. Background Česká pošta, the Czech Republic’s incumbent postal operator, has been appointed as the universal postal service provider nationwide. Under the universal service obligation (USO), Česká pošta must, among other requirements, ensure specified letter and parcel delivery services are available on each business day throughout the whole of the Czech Republic. The General Court upheld this decision...
Consideration of electronic data interchange (EDI) frameworks, blockchain, smart contracts, or sector‑specific legislation or regulation, including regimes for financial services, intermediation services, or online auctions, falls outside the scope of this Practice Note. For a primer on EDI and smart contracts, see Practice Notes: Business to business e‑commerce—introduction and Smart legal contracts. For blockchain guidance, refer to Blockchain—overview and Practice Note: Blockchain—key legal and regulatory issues. The type and functionality of the website A website’s compliance obligations and the rules that apply will vary according to the kind of site in question and its intended functionality or aim and audience. As an initial step, the site operator should determine, early on, the nature of the proposed site and the planned extent of its functionality. For example, consider the following questions: will the site be an ‘information only’ destination? will it operate as a platform where third parties upload material or content or execute transactions? will it deliver a service? will it...
Once a rolling stock lessor has accepted delivery of units from the manufacturer, suitable maintenance frameworks are put in place to keep the fleet in good order. The selected approach will hinge on various factors; however, for newly built rolling stock in UK passenger operations, a Train Services Agreement (TSA) is a common choice. For further detail on maintenance options, see Practice Note: Rail finance—leasing and maintenance arrangements, which summarises the key provisions of a typical TSA. Parties to a TSA A TSA is typically a bilateral arrangement between a maintenance provider (usually the rolling stock manufacturer or one of its affiliates) and the operator. On occasion, the lessor also joins, resulting in a tripartite TSA. The core provisions of a TSA Services The maintenance provider will be required to deliver a range of services, and a TSA commonly differentiates between ‘standard services’ and ‘additional services’. Standard services Standard services are the routine obligations the maintenance provider must perform in return for the...
Instead of having rolling stock looked after by a maintenance provider pursuant to a train services agreement (TSA), an operator may decide to perform the maintenance itself, or arrange for a third party to undertake it under an existing maintenance agreement. For further details on TSAs, see Practice Note: Rail finance—train services agreements. If the Operator opts to maintain the rolling stock in-house, it may need specific technical support from the original manufacturer or from another supplier to carry out that maintenance. In those circumstances, the operator may enter into a technical support and spares supply agreement (TSSSA). This Practice Note summarises the principal provisions of a standard TSSSA and outlines the core terms typically encountered. Parties to a TSSSA A TSSSA is generally a two-party arrangement between a supplier and the operator and, owing to the nature of the services to be delivered under such an agreement, the supplier will usually be the original manufacturer of the rolling stock...
This Agreement is entered into on [ insert date ] Parties [ insert name ], a company incorporated in [ England and Wales ] with registered number [ insert registered number ], whose registered office is at [ insert address ] (Supplier); and [ insert name ], a company incorporated in [ England and Wales ] with registered number [ insert registered number ], whose registered office is at [ insert address ] (MVNO). Each of the Supplier and the MVNO is a party and, together, the Supplier and the MVNO are the parties. Background The Supplier operates a mobile network within the Territory. The MVNO functions as a mobile virtual network operator in the Territory. The Supplier has agreed to supply wholesale mobile electronic communications services to the MVNO for onward sale [ on a pre-pay basis OR on a post-pay basis OR on a pre-pay and post-pay basis ] in the Territory, in accordance...