Over-allotment facility meaning

Oswin v Otila; and Ondray Claim No ARB 032/2025 What was the background? This matter arose from a falling-out between Oswin (the Claimant) and Ondray (the Second Defendant) over how to run their joint venture company, Otila (the First Defendant). Oswin owned 49% of the First Defendant’s shares and Ondray 51%. The board could act only by unanimous vote, while shareholder resolutions required a 75% super-majority. When they were unable to agree on management and operations, the company became deadlocked. Their relationship was governed by a Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) dated 12 March 2019, which included an arbitration clause calling for DIFC-seated proceedings under the DIFC-LCIA Rules. The Claimant also operated a medical and hazardous waste facility under an Operations and Management Agreement due to expire on 21 August 2025. On 15 August 2025, the Claimant issued a Dispute Notice under clause 21.2 of the JVA, alleging that the Second Defendant was assuming strategic decision-making without proper authority—covering directions on renewal of the O&M Agreement, instruction of external...

The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) has, for years, warned about a widening ‘natural catastrophe insurance protection gap’ across the EU. This gap captures the mismatch between overall losses caused by natural disasters and the portion of those losses that are insured. According to EIOPA and the European Central Bank (ECB), from 1981 to 2023 natural catastrophes cost EU member states €900bn, with one fifth of that bill arising in just the most recent three years. Over the same period, only around a quarter of losses were insured, and that proportion is falling. We have previously outlined EIOPA’s worries about the consequences of this catastrophe gap (see here). In this article, we examine the actions that EIOPA and the ECB now formally propose to narrow the protection gap, as set out in a paper issued on 18 December 2024 (the 2024 Paper). In brief, the proposals (explained further below) rest on two pillars: a public–private, EU‑wide reinsurance facility (designed to complement existing national insurance schemes in some member...

Oceanus Capital SARL contended, in a High Court claim dated 16 August 2024, that Lloyd’s Insurance Company SA is in breach of an insurance policy intended to safeguard its interest in a cargo vessel pledged as security for a loan facility. The Luxembourg-based company seeks indemnity for losses it says arose from the mine strike, including the unpaid balance of the loan and expenses said to have been incurred after the ship was struck. The claim asserts that Oceanus, as mortgagee, has lost its interest by reason of an insured peril, and alleges the defendant has wrongfully failed to pay under the mortgagee’s interest policy. Oceanus Capital said that in 2022 it advanced a US$3m loan to Lyra Mare Ltd, owner of a cargo ship managed by Nava Shipping Ltd. The lending was allegedly secured by a first-preference mortgage over the vessel. The claim also records that Lyra Mare’s interest in the ship was insured under a marine war risks policy issued by Vessel Protect on behalf of Lloyd’s underwriters...

A glossary of frequently used terms and phrases in Scottish Private Client law, with the closest England and Wales equivalents (where applicable) and links to helpful websites Ab intestato Meaning From someone who dies without a will; describes property taken under the laws of intestate succession. Nearest English equivalent None Action of specific implement Meaning A court action seeking an order compelling a party to carry out a particular act. In Scotland there is no division between equitable and legal remedies, unlike England and Wales. Nearest English equivalent Specific performance (an equitable remedy for breach of contract that can be ordered alongside, or in place of, damages) Advance notice Meaning An entry in the relevant property register that protects the grantee of a deed intended for registration in the Land Register of Scotland. The protected period of 35 days begins on the day after registration....

Statutory paid holiday In Great Britain, workers have a legal entitlement to 5.6 weeks’ paid annual leave under the Working Time Regulations 1998 (WTR 1998), SI 1998/1833. It should be recognised from the start that this is made up of two components: a core entitlement of four weeks’ paid annual leave (often called ‘Euro leave’) (WTR 1998, SI 1998/1833, reg 13), and an extra 1.6 weeks’ paid annual leave (WTR 1998, SI 1998/1833, reg 13A) Different rules apply to irregular hours and part-year workers for holiday years beginning on or after 1 April 2024. For further details, see Practice Note: Statutory paid holiday—irregular hours workers and part-year workers. For the position in Northern Ireland, which has its own Working Time Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2016, SI 2016/49, see Practice Note: Employment law in Northern Ireland—Working Time Regulations and holidays. The basic four-week entitlement reflects the UK’s implementation of the EU minimum in Article 7 of Directive 2003/88/EC (the Working Time Directive),...

Scope of this Practice Note This Practice Note sets out the main types of radioactive waste and examines disposal against the EU-defined waste hierarchy. It places contemporary management of radioactive waste within the historical development of the nuclear industry from a planning standpoint. Principal policy documents are reviewed to chart the evolution of government thinking over time. Geological disposal of Higher Activity Waste (HAW) under the Planning Act 2008 (PA 2008) is compared with alternative disposal routes under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (TCPA 1990) and the Planning (Wales) Act 2015. Consultation duties, application processes and required consents are identified for both regimes. Notable planning appeals and judicial review cases are highlighted before looking at international approaches to radioactive waste. What is radioactive waste? In the UK, radioactive waste arises—and will arise—from past, current and future programmes for electricity generation from nuclear fission, the reprocessing of nuclear fuel, the development of nuclear weapons, the nuclear submarine fleet and wastes from radioactive materials used for civil...

TO BE PRINTED ON THE BORROWER’S SOLICITORS’ HEADED PAPER To: [ insert details of the lender’s solicitors ] (the Lender’s Solicitors) and [ insert details of the lender ] (the Lender) Dear [ insert organisation name ] Completion undertaking This undertaking concerns the acquisition of [ insert property description ] (the Property) by [ insert borrower’s name ] (the Borrower) under a sale contract dated [ insert date ] between [ insert seller’s name ] (the Seller) and the Borrower (the Sale Contract), together with the grant of a first legal charge over the Property in favour of the Lender pursuant to a facility agreement dated [ insert date ] between [ insert details ] (the Facility Agreement). For the purposes of this letter, ‘completion’ means completion of the Transfer of the Property to the Borrower (the Transfer), and does not include registration of the Transfer at HM Land Registry. We are instructed by the Borrower. We enclose: ...

This Deed is executed on [ insert day and month ] 20[ insert year ] Parties [ insert name of Chargor ], a company incorporated in England and Wales with registered number [ insert company number ], with its registered office at [ insert address ] (the Chargor); and [ insert name of Lender ] of [ insert address ] (the Lender). Recitals: The Lender has agreed to provide a loan facility to the Chargor on the terms and conditions contained in the Facility Agreement (as defined below). As a condition precedent to the availability of that facility, the Chargor must enter into this Deed to create security in favour of the Lender for the Secured Obligations (as defined below)...

This Deed is dated [ insert day and month ] 20[ insert year ] and is entered into by the parties set out below. Parties [ insert name of Chargor ], a company registered in England and Wales under number [ insert company number ], with its registered office at [ insert address ] (the Chargor); and [ insert name of Lender ] of [ insert address ] (the Lender). Recitals: The Lender has consented to provide a loan facility to the Chargor on the terms and conditions set out in, and subject to, the Facility Agreement (as defined below). It is a condition precedent to the availability of that facility that the Chargor enter into this Deed for the purpose of granting security in favour of the Lender in respect of the Secured Obligations (as defined below). ...

Under WTR 1998, workers get 5.6 weeks’ annual leave each year: a basic entitlement of four weeks’ leave (20 days for a standard full‑time worker) implementing article 7 of the Working Time Directive (WTD) an additional 1.6 weeks’ leave (eight days for a standard full‑time worker) created by domestic law only Understanding this distinction is important because: European Court of Justice case law concerns the WTD alone, so it applies only to the basic four weeks’ paid leave holiday pay is calculated differently for: the basic four weeks, and the additional 1.6 weeks The general rules as to the right to carry forward accrued holiday entitlement are that: the basic four weeks must be taken in the leave year earned and cannot be carried over (though an employer may choose to allow it) a relevant agreement may allow the additional 1.6...