Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“In some areas of research there were also significant time savings. You get to what you are looking for more quickly, which all goes to the value of the product.”

Harper Mcleod

Access all documents on Over-cure

Over-cure meaning

What does Over-cure mean?
In loan agreements with an equity cure right, an over-cure arises when the sponsor injects more equity than is needed to remedy a financial covenant breach at the relevant test date. It is a market term, not defined in legislation or case law, and its effect depends on the wording of the facility agreement (and any intercreditor agreement). Typical treatments include: the excess is ignored once compliance is restored; the excess must be applied in prepayment of the senior facilities to reduce leverage; or the excess is credited to future covenant tests (for example by increasing EBITDA or reducing net debt for one or more periods), often called a cure carry-forward or EBITDA cure. Documentation commonly limits over-cure by caps, frequency limits, prohibitions on curing multiple covenants, no cash leakage and no double-counting, and may restrict using an over-cure to create headroom for other financial covenants. The treatment of over-cure is a key negotiated point in leveraged finance, affecting future headroom, covenant flexibility and the value of cure rights and sponsor support. Usage and legal effect are broadly consistent across England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland (where LMA-style terms are prevalent), but outcomes are contractual and turn on the agreed drafting.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Checklists about Over-cure

CHECKLISTS
Global merger control: jurisdictions requiring notification of non-controlling minority shareholdings (checklist and thresholds)

Non-controlling minority shareholdings This Checklist identifies the jurisdictions worldwide where acquisitions of non‑controlling minority shareholdings must be notified, provided the other jurisdictional thresholds are satisfied. In this context, ‘non‑controlling minority shareholdings’ means any degree of influence falling short of what the EU Merger Regulation terms ‘decisive influence’—namely, the capacity to exercise a significant level of control over an undertaking’s strategic commercial behaviour. That influence can be exercised through a variety of routes, including share ownership, voting rights (in particular, veto rights), or contractual arrangements, and does not necessarily involve holding a majority shareholding...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
Corporate Mortgages: Practitioners' Checklist on Capacity, Due Diligence, Documentation, Priority and Registration (England and Wales)

Scope of this Checklist This Checklist sets out the points to consider when a company is proposing to grant a mortgage. It proceeds on the basis that an English or Welsh company will be granting a mortgage to a lender situated in England or Wales. In this Checklist: the company granting the mortgage is the 'mortgagor' the party to whom the mortgage is granted is the 'mortgagee' the document recording the mortgage is the 'security document' Preliminary questions before taking security by way of a mortgage Is a mortgage the right method of taking security? A mortgage transfers title to the asset, while preserving the mortgagor's equity of redemption so that, once sums due have been paid in full, title can be transferred back to the mortgagor (note that some mortgages, such as over land, are statutory, meaning there is no transfer of title). The use and possession of the asset will remain with...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
Section 27 LTA 1954 tenant termination of business tenancies: checklist on fixed-term requirement, timing, s25/s26 interplay, holding over, notice content/service and rent apportionment (England and Wales)

To bring a business tenancy to an end on the contractual expiry date or at any point thereafter, a tenant may rely on a notice given under section 27 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (LTA 1954). This Checklist sets out the circumstances and procedure for serving such a notice. For wider guidance on ending LTA 1954 tenancies, refer to Practice Note: LTA 1954 business lease renewal—termination. It outlines timing and the method of service in clear terms. Is the tenancy for a fixed term? A section 27 notice is available only where the tenancy is for a fixed term. It is not available for periodic tenancies. Nevertheless, a tenant may end a periodic tenancy by giving a common law notice to quit (see Practice Note: LTA 1954 business lease renewal—termination under the heading Termination of LTA 1954 tenancies). Have any other notices been served? Once a tenant has served a section 26 request, they cannot then serve a section 27 notice...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Flowcharts about Over-cure

FLOWCHARTS
UK GDPR right to erasure: practitioner flowchart covering grounds, exemptions, necessary processing and notification duties (DPA 2018; ICO guidance; DUAA 2025 update)

Flowchart This Flowchart helps determine which stamp duty land tax (SDLT) provisions are relevant on a lease renewal where a tenant remains in occupation by ‘holding over’ after a fixed-term lease ends. It should be considered together with the fuller Practice Note: SDLT—holding over. The SDLT provisions governing situations where a tenant holds over a lease, and that lease is subsequently renewed, are intricate and often complex...

Read More Right Arrow
FLOWCHARTS
SDLT on Lease Renewals Where the Tenant Holds Over—Flowchart (England and Northern Ireland, post-17 July 2013)

In Scotland, minor offences proceed by way of a summary complaint...

Read More Right Arrow
FLOWCHARTS
JCT Standard Building Contract 2024/2016 (WQ, WoQ, WAQ): Interim Payment Procedure—Applications, Due and Final Dates, Payment and Pay Less Notices (Flowchart)

A company share option plan (CSOP) A company share option plan (CSOP) enables tax-favoured options over shares with a value up to £60,000 per person, assessed as at the grant date, to be awarded at the discretion of companies that satisfy the CSOP qualifying criteria, and is commonly adopted by companies that are too large to be eligible to issue enterprise management incentive (EMI) options...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related News about Over-cure

NEWS
EU competition law: Commission Phase I clearances (Kee Safety; Grand Bahamas Shipyard); new merger notifications; Broadcom/VMware decision documents; Finnish soft drinks tax not State aid

Mergers The Commission approved: the securing of joint control over Kee Safety Group by Inflexion Private Equity Partners LLP and 65 Equity Partners Pte. Ltd (M.11983) following a phase I investigation—for further details, see Midday Express the attainment of joint control of Grand Bahamas Shipyard Ltd...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
EU competition law update: X2O clearance; Trafigura/Meroil, Proman/Valenz, Mutares/Serneke notifications; General Court hearing on PostNord/Post Danmark state aid; upcoming dates (20/09/2024)

Mergers The Commission approved the purchase granting joint control over X2O group to Vendis Capital Management NV and Waterland Private Equity Investments B.V....

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
EU competition law daily briefing: statement of objections to Meta over WhatsApp AI assistant access ban; possible interim measures; updated reform timeline; merger clearances; State aid decisions; key upcoming dates

Antitrust Commission issues SO to Meta over WhatsApp AI access limits; flags possible interim measures The Commission has delivered a statement of objections to Meta, outlining its preliminary assessment that Meta blocked third-party artificial intelligence (AI) assistants from accessing and engaging with users on WhatsApp, infringing Article 102 TFEU (AT.41034). The Commission considers that Meta’s behaviour risks preventing competitors from entering or growing in the rapidly expanding market for general-purpose AI assistants and has therefore indicated its intention to impose interim measures (subject to Meta’s rights of defence) to avoid serious and irreparable harm to competition. Background On 15 October 2025, Meta announced changes to its WhatsApp Business Solution Terms, effectively prohibiting third-party general-purpose AI assistants from the platform. Consequently, from 15 January 2026, Meta’s own assistant, Meta AI, has been the only AI assistant available on WhatsApp. On 4 December 2025, the Commission opened formal proceedings to examine whether this policy shift amounts to an abuse of dominance. The investigation covers the EEA, excluding Italy, where...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Over-cure

PRACTICE NOTES
Agricultural holdings disputes in Scotland: Scottish Land Court jurisdiction, exceptions, procedures and remedies; arbitration, mediation and appeals

For many years, virtually every disagreement about agricultural tenancies was sent to arbitration at the outset. The rationale was that questions concerning agricultural holdings often have a strong practical dimension, so arbitration was thought a more suitable forum than the courts. This reflected the earlier assumption that practical considerations predominated in such cases, making a court reference less apt back then. Over time, however, matters of considerable legal intricacy also came before arbitrators. With the enactment of the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 2003 (AH(S)A 2003), policy shifted, and the main route for resolving disputes about agricultural tenant issues is now referral to the Scottish Land Court. At the same time, arbitration procedures were streamlined, and alternative processes, eg mediation, were enabled. Although the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 1991 (AH(S)A 1991) still sets out distinct mechanisms for dispute resolution, AH(S)A 2003 has substantially reshaped them, so that the arrangements for resolving disputes under 1991 Act Tenancies are, in large part, aligned with those for 2003 Act Tenancies...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
EU General Court upholds Commission’s re-adopted decision on retail food packaging trays cartel: CCPL v Commission—parental liability, 10% cap per infringement and inability-to-pay rejected

CASE HUB ARCHIVED This archived case hub reflects the position as at the judgment of 7 December 2022; it is no longer maintained. See further, timeline. Case facts Outline Appeal before the General Court seeking annulment of the Commission’s readopted infringement decision of 17 December 2020, which imposed a reduced fine amounting to €9.4m (AT.39563). Latest development On 7 December 2022, the General Court delivered its judgment and dismissed the appeal in full. In particular, it found that: (i) CCPL grasped the Commission’s reasoning, and the material presented by CCPL was insufficient to overturn the presumption applied by the Commission that CCPL exercised decisive influence over entities within the CCPL group; and (iii) the Commission did not err in concluding that a fine reduction can only be warranted by the aim of preventing the undertaking’s economic viability from being irreparably endangered and its assets stripped of value, so the applicant’s intention to develop operating companies of the CCPL group cannot, in principle, justify such...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Distressed debt: tax consequences of creditor enforcement—sale, receivership, administration, foreclosure, and transfers to lenders (satisfaction or set-off)

This Practice Note sets out the principal tax considerations where creditors move to enforce security over the assets of a distressed company or corporate group. Related Practice Notes in this series address tax issues concerning: acquisitions of distressed debt, and debt restructurings (ie waivers, debt/equity swaps or renegotiations) In addition, Tax and distressed debt—checklist of points to consider distils the main tax points to bear in mind when dealing with distressed debt in general. This Practice Note reviews the enforcement routes open to creditors of troubled businesses and the consequences that may follow. For a detailed look at the loan relationships provisions on debt releases, see: Loan relationships—impairment and debt releases Loan relationships—impairment and debt releases: connected companies Types of enforcement As explained in Practice Note: Tax and distressed debt—debt restructurings, lenders will frequently engage in a restructuring of a distressed group’s debt to help the underlying business continue. Enforcing security over a borrower’s assets...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about Over-cure

PRECEDENTS
Will precedent (England and Wales): nil-rate band discretionary trust legacy; spouse’s FLIT over residue; children as remaindermen; wide trustee powers and administrative schedules

FORTHCOMING CHANGE: Potential changes to Wills Act 1837 The Law Commission’s review of wills culminated in a final report on 16 May 2025. Volume II contains a Draft Bill proposing replacement of the Wills Act 1837. For details of these proposals, including the published draft legislation, see Practice Note: Hot topic—modernising Wills and Modernising wills: Final Report Volume II: Draft Bill for a new Wills Act. STOP PRESS: Abolition of non-dom regime and introduction of residence-based IHT regime The Finance Act 2025 (FA 2025), which received Royal Assent on 20 March 2025, implements the abolition of the remittance basis and introduces a residence-based regime from 6 April 2025. FA 2025 makes residence, rather than domicile, the main determinant of liability to inheritance tax. changes to the rules defining excluded property status; removal of protected settlements status for offshore trusts; and modifications to overseas workday relief. For further information, see Practice Notes: The abolition of the remittance basis of taxation...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Commercial lease clause suspending tenant repair obligations during pandemic trading/use restrictions, with scope set by the Landlord’s Surveyor and defined Restricted Period and Competent Authority triggers

Definitions (General) Competent Authority • any body exercising jurisdiction over the Property, its occupation or its use; Restricted Period • any period [ exceeding [ number ] [ continuous ] weeks ] within the Term when a Pandemic Restriction is operative; Pandemic Restriction • any Legislation, or any requirement from, or guidance issued by, a Competent Authority that: (a) arises from [ COVID-19 or the occurrence of any other OR any ] national or local pandemic disease; and (b) prohibits, hinders or limits the Tenant from [ fully ] [ trading at the Property OR using [ more than [ number ]% (measured by floor area) of ] the Property for the Permitted Use ] . 1 Repair—suspension of Tenant’s repair obligation for pandemic reason The Tenant’s obligation to observe [ this clause OR clause [ number ] ] is suspended to such extent as the Landlord’s Surveyor deems fair...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Borrower’s Solicitors’ Completion Undertaking to Lender’s Solicitors: Commercial Property Purchase and First Legal Charge (England and Wales)

TO BE PRINTED ON THE BORROWER’S SOLICITORS’ HEADED PAPER To: [ insert details of the lender’s solicitors ] (the Lender’s Solicitors) and [ insert details of the lender ] (the Lender) Dear [ insert organisation name ] Completion undertaking This undertaking concerns the acquisition of [ insert property description ] (the Property) by [ insert borrower’s name ] (the Borrower) under a sale contract dated [ insert date ] between [ insert seller’s name ] (the Seller) and the Borrower (the Sale Contract), together with the grant of a first legal charge over the Property in favour of the Lender pursuant to a facility agreement dated [ insert date ] between [ insert details ] (the Facility Agreement). For the purposes of this letter, ‘completion’ means completion of the Transfer of the Property to the Borrower (the Transfer), and does not include registration of the Transfer at HM Land Registry. We are instructed by the Borrower. We enclose: ...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Q&As about Over-cure

Q&As
Holiday carry over if leave not prevented: permitted by contract?

Under WTR 1998, workers get 5.6 weeks’ annual leave each year: a basic entitlement of four weeks’ leave (20 days for a standard full‑time worker) implementing article 7 of the Working Time Directive (WTD) an additional 1.6 weeks’ leave (eight days for a standard full‑time worker) created by domestic law only Understanding this distinction is important because: European Court of Justice case law concerns the WTD alone, so it applies only to the basic four weeks’ paid leave holiday pay is calculated differently for: the basic four weeks, and the additional 1.6 weeks The general rules as to the right to carry forward accrued holiday entitlement are that: the basic four weeks must be taken in the leave year earned and cannot be carried over (though an employer may choose to allow it) a relevant agreement may allow the additional 1.6...

Read More Right Arrow
Q&As
Local authority options for repeated heavy‑vehicle damage to a highway maintainable at public expense

Given the enquirer notes the highway is 'seldom used', the initial issue to examine is whether the route ought to remain a highway that is maintained at the cost of the public purse...

Read More Right Arrow
Q&As
Are 1969 conveyance access rights overriding if unnoted?

The continuing enforceability of the right of access After the A Land is first registered, whether a right of access remains enforceable hinges on the date when the title to the A Land was first entered on the register. If that initial registration occurred before 13 October 2003, the Land Registration Act 1925, ss 5 and 9 (LRA 1925), provided that the first proprietor of the A Land took the estate subject to any overriding interests that already affected the A Land...

Read More Right Arrow