Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“A lot of the work that I do is historic-the maximum sentences change at different points of time. It's really complicated and people get it wrong all the time. That's when having a timeline is really useful.”

1 High Pavement

Access all documents on Paid-up

Paid-up meaning

What does Paid-up mean?
In life assurance practice, paid-up describes a policy that remains in force after the policyholder stops paying premiums, usually with a reduced sum assured calculated from the policy’s accrued cash/surrender value (the paid-up value). It is a descriptive industry term rather than a concept defined in statute or case law, and its operation is governed by the insurer’s policy conditions. To become paid-up, the policy must have built sufficient surrender value; otherwise non-payment typically causes the policy to lapse. Existing reversionary bonuses on with-profits policies usually remain attached, but future bonuses may cease or be limited. Riders and ancillary benefits (for example, waiver of premium or critical illness) often terminate. No further premiums are due, but fees, charges and any policy loan interest may still be deducted, and the paid-up sum can reduce if deductions continue. Paid-up status preserves life cover and avoids forfeiture without surrendering the policy. Usage and effect are broadly consistent across England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland, subject to individual policy terms and applicable regulatory requirements.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Checklists about Paid-up

CHECKLISTS
Investigatory Powers Act 2016: offences, statutory defences and maximum sentences—practitioner checklist (UK)

The Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (IPA 2016) revamped the legal regime regulating covert surveillance by public authorities. IPA 2016 superseded large parts of the framework previously, though not solely, contained in the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA 2000). See Practice Note: The regulation of intelligence gathering—an introductory guide. This note outlines the offences introduced by IPA 2016. For details of general sentencing limits in a magistrates’ court, see Practice Note: Sentences imposed following conviction—General limits on magistrates’ courts powers to impose custodial sentences following conviction... Section Offence Statutory defence Maximum sentence IPA 2016, s 3 — Unlawful interception: a person, by conduct in the UK, deliberately intercepts a communication during its transmission without lawful authority. Defence: where the individual has the right to control the operation or use of the system, or had that person’s express or implied consent to carry out the interception. Maximum sentence: on summary conviction, a fine; on indictment, up to two years’ imprisonment and/or a...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
In-house lawyer onboarding: structured line manager meeting checklist—priorities, stakeholders, legal issues, budgets and reporting

A meeting with your line manager on your first day Setting up a meeting with your line manager on day one of your new role is strongly advisable. Although it will most likely be an initial ‘getting to know you’ chat, there are several questions you can raise to help you feel more at ease in the position. If you are the only in-house lawyer or leading an internal legal team, your line manager will typically be the CEO or Finance Director, though it could be any other director. If you are joining an existing team, your line manager may sit in a legal, regulatory or compliance function, for example: Company Secretary General Counsel Senior Solicitor Legal Director Compliance Director Alternatively, they may hold a non-legal post, such as Finance Director or CEO. In a larger team with multiple layers in the reporting structure, your line manager could be someone else within that hierarchy. This Checklist highlights the key...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
Workplace Pensions and Statutory Family Leave: Accrual, Contributions and Employer/Trustee Duties (Maternity, Paternity, Adoption, Parental, Shared Parental, Bereavement, Carer’s) - Checklist

Legislation safeguards the pension entitlements of members of occupational pension schemes and other employment‑related benefit arrangements, including workplace personal pension schemes that receive employer contributions, while they are away from work on statutory family leave. Statutory family leave encompasses: maternity leave paternity leave adoption leave parental leave shared parental leave parental bereavement leave carer’s leave Maternity leave Occupational pension schemes are taken to include a maternity equality rule requiring periods when a member is on maternity leave to be treated in the same manner as periods when they are not on maternity leave. This maternity equality rule applies to both paid and unpaid ordinary maternity leave (OML), as well as to paid additional maternity leave (AML). As a result, under this rule, time spent on OML and paid AML in a defined benefit (DB) scheme is recognised as pensionable service...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Flowcharts about Paid-up

FLOWCHARTS
Appointing a Company Secretary: Step-by-Step Flowchart and Required Filings

Open or print a full-sized PDF version...

Read More Right Arrow
FLOWCHARTS
Consumer goods: cancellation rights, exclusions and refund/return obligations under the Consumer Contracts (Information, Cancellation and Additional Charges) Regulations 2013 (UK) for distance, off-premises and on-premises sales—Flowchart

The EU has adopted ambitious goals to curb its greenhouse gas emissions steadily up to and beyond 2030, ultimately seeking to fully attain net zero emissions by the year 2050...

Read More Right Arrow
FLOWCHARTS
England and Wales disclosure flowchart: determine applicability of B&PCs Disclosure Scheme (CPR PD 57AD) or CPR 31/PD 31A/PD 31B

Procurement process flowchart This Procurement process flowchart outlines the sequence a procurement might follow, alongside the factors to weigh up so a clear and appropriate procurement route is observed. It further highlights the Precedents on hand to support you throughout the procurement journey. The Flowchart serves as an illustrative example rather than a conclusive guide. Organisations can, of course, operate quite distinct procedures; nevertheless, it offers a useful baseline or point of reference. Any contract value amounts shown are presented purely as examples for illustrative purposes only here...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related News about Paid-up

NEWS
EU competition law daily: Commission Phase I merger clearances, simplified notifications; Ryanair Reg 1/2003 reference; General Court KRKA/Servier order; calendar (26 January 2026)

Mergers The Commission cleared: Hartree Partners Holdings, LP’s acquisition of exclusive control of Touton S.A. (M.12189), following a phase I investigation—see further in Midday Express the establishment of a joint venture by EVH Grüne Energie – Beteiligung GmbH & Co. KG and HSBC Alternative Investments S.C.A. SICAV-RAIF (M.12240), following a phase I investigation—see further in Midday Express the setting up of a joint venture by RCL Cruises Ltd....

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
EU competition and State aid: pharmaceutical enforcement 2018–2022, MEO test guidance on risk finance, mergers update (26 January 2024)

Competition policy Commission publishes report on enforcement of EU antitrust and merger control rules in the pharmaceutical sector between 2018–2022 The Commission has issued a report on competition enforcement—covering antitrust and merger control—in the pharmaceutical sector, outlining the activities undertaken by the Commission and national competition authorities during 2018 to 2022. It updates an earlier 2019 report that examined the period from 2009 to 2017. Alongside a broad overview of enforcement in pharmaceuticals, the report describes the sector’s key features that guide competition assessments and, through concrete and practical examples, clearly demonstrates how competition law action protected undertakings and consumers, including in the course of the Covid-19 crisis...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Daily EU competition law round-up: General Court appeals (Teva, Red Bull, Nvidia), mergers (Liberty/Dorna, Infravia/Iliad), State aid (Croatia, Austria), Foreign Subsidies Regulation (Amcor/Berry) — 24 February 2025

Antitrust A fresh appeal has been filed before the General Court in Case T- 19/25, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries and Teva Pharmaceuticals Europe v Commission, challenging the Commission’s decision in Teva (Copaxone) (AT.40588) and requesting that the fine-imposing infringement ruling be annulled—see further, application A fresh appeal has been submitted before the General Court in Case T- 682/24, Red Bull and Others v Commission, brought against the Commission for failing to reimburse additional costs incurred due to the disproportionate prolongation of an inspection—see further, application NOTE—For all...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Paid-up

PRACTICE NOTES
The Pensions Regulator's moral hazard powers: contribution notices and financial support directions: tests, procedure, reasonableness, guidance, case law, clearance and Pension Schemes Act 2021 criminal offences

The Pensions Regulator (the Regulator) The Regulator is an arm’s-length public body set up under the Pensions Act 2004 (PeA 2004). Its authority to impose contribution notices and financial support directions appears in PeA 2004, ss 38–50. Although the Act does not use the label, these provisions are widely known as the Regulator’s ‘moral hazard’ powers. Their purpose is to counter the ‘moral hazard’ arising from the Pension Protection Fund (PPF): the possibility that corporate groups might organise their structures so as to heighten exposure within their pension schemes, comfortable that the PPF would intervene if the employer entered insolvency. The principal moral hazard tools—and the only ones exercised so far—are the power to issue a contribution notice (CN) and the power to issue a financial support direction (FSD). A CN compels the recipient to pay a specified amount into a defined benefit occupational pension scheme. A CN can be issued where the criteria in PeA 2004, s 38 are satisfied. These mechanisms exist to deter behaviour that would...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
West Tankers: practical impact under Brussels I (recast)—no court anti-suit injunctions; tribunals’ power to award damages for breach of arbitration agreements; recognition of anti-suit awards

ARCHIVED: This Practice Note is archived and not kept up to date. Practical implications of West Tankers In short, the current position arising from the West Tankers saga (so far) is: Any EU Member State court seised of proceedings must rule on its own jurisdiction to determine the dispute. Under Brussels I and Brussels I (recast), courts of another Member State cannot remove that competence from it. An arbitral tribunal has jurisdiction to award damages for breach of an obligation to arbitrate. Where jurisdiction is disputed (as it often is), consider advising clients to obtain a standalone final award addressing jurisdiction at the outset, and then seek to have it recognised and enforced by the court (the application would be made under the procedure set out in CPR 62). This should prevent a conflicting court judgment taking precedence, on the basis of issue estoppel. Thereafter, the parties can proceed to the liability and quantum issues within the arbitration. West Tankers—the...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
UK LLP PSC register: identifying PSCs and RLEs, significant influence, fund structures, investigation duties, and Companies House filings (including ECCTA 2023 reforms)

People with significant control (PSC) regime The architecture of the people with significant control (PSC) regime, which first commenced on 6 April 2016, is contained in Part 21A of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). Its purpose is to tackle worries about the lack of transparency in corporate ownership, where historically the register captured only the legal holder of shares, not always the beneficial owner. By requiring a PSC register, more precise and up‑to‑date details are available about who ultimately owns and directs companies and other bodies, and this information is made public via the central register at Companies House and remains accessible to the public. It assists prospective investors in their decision‑making. It likewise aids law enforcement bodies with money laundering enquiries. LLPs formed under the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 must keep a record of persons with significant control over the LLP under the Limited Liability Partnerships (Register of People with Significant Control) Regulations 2016, SI 2016/340 (the LLP Regulations), as amended by the Information about People...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about Paid-up

PRECEDENTS
Precedent: Scottish licensed premises sale - missives clauses on premises licence transfer, major variation, gaming machine permits, seller warranties and suspensive conditions (L(S)A 2005)

1 Definitions Completion – denotes the Date of Entry or, if later, the day the Price is paid and the purchase of the Property [ and Business ] is finalised under the Missives; Business – denotes the [ insert number ] [ star, ] [ , hotel ] [ , restaurant ] [ , café ] [ , bar ] [ , public house ] enterprise conducted by the Seller at the Property, providing [ [ describe accommodation type eg rooms, apartment or hotel ] ] [ , the sale of food and beverage ] [ , weddings ] [ , conference centre ] [ , leisure centre ] [ , spa ] [ , golf course ] [ , hairdresser ] [ , on-site staff accommodation ] together with all other activities, including those ancillary, incidental to, or connected with such business; Conclusion Date – means, unless stated otherwise, the first date on which the Missives bring about a concluded contract; Date of...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Precedent: in-house legal team brand workshop—PowerPoint template and facilitation notes to define value, prioritise actions and raise your profile across the business

This Precedent includes a PowerPoint team brand workshop template with accompanying notes to help you run a session with your team to identify the key activities and values you want your business to be recognised for. It guides you and the group through sharing and refining ideas, then moves into setting concrete actions and clear next steps. 1 Meeting logistics Let the team know in advance that this will be a working session and ask them to consider how they add value to the business, arriving prepared to share their views. Have to hand paper, one pack of sticky notes per person, marker pens for everyone, and a space in the room where items can be put up on the wall. Plan for two and a half hours, including a 15-minute comfort break halfway through (based on five to ten attendees). Appoint someone in the team to help with timekeeping and to compile a list of actions, owners and timescales to capture at the end of the meeting....

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Executive director service agreement (Scotland): comprehensive precedent with drafting options, covering remuneration, benefits, confidentiality, IP, garden leave, change of control, and post-termination restrictive covenants

This Agreement is executed on [ date ] Parties 1 [ Name of company ] , a company constituted in [ Scotland ] bearing registered number [ number ] with its registered office at [ address ] (the Company ); and 2 [ Name of employee ] , of [ address ] ( you )...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Q&As about Paid-up

Q&As
Holiday carry over if leave not prevented: permitted by contract?

Under WTR 1998, workers get 5.6 weeks’ annual leave each year: a basic entitlement of four weeks’ leave (20 days for a standard full‑time worker) implementing article 7 of the Working Time Directive (WTD) an additional 1.6 weeks’ leave (eight days for a standard full‑time worker) created by domestic law only Understanding this distinction is important because: European Court of Justice case law concerns the WTD alone, so it applies only to the basic four weeks’ paid leave holiday pay is calculated differently for: the basic four weeks, and the additional 1.6 weeks The general rules as to the right to carry forward accrued holiday entitlement are that: the basic four weeks must be taken in the leave year earned and cannot be carried over (though an employer may choose to allow it) a relevant agreement may allow the additional 1.6...

Read More Right Arrow
Q&As
Employer auxiliary aid in union paid time off; trade organisation duty?

Duty to make reasonable adjustments The Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) establishes a duty to make reasonable adjustments (referred to below as ‘the duty’), which contains three distinct requirements. The third requires that, where a disabled person would, without the provision of an auxiliary aid, face a substantial disadvantage in relation to a relevant matter when compared with people who are not disabled, such steps as are reasonable must be taken to supply the auxiliary aid. The situations in which the duty arises differ across workplace settings. Accordingly, the precise circumstances that engage the duty will not be uniform across all settings. For all three requirements, the duty is triggered only where a disabled individual is placed at a substantial disadvantage compared with non‑disabled people ‘in relation to a “relevant matter”’, and what counts as a ‘relevant matter’ (as defined in EqA 2010, Sch 8 Pt 1) varies according to the particular type of workplace. As a result, application of the duty is context‑specific to the workplace in question....

Read More Right Arrow
Q&As
LLP insolvency: ranking of members’ capital and current accounts vs unsecured creditors; can this be altered by agreement?

In partnership with Alexander Stewart of Hogarth Chambers If a limited liability partnership (LLP) becomes insolvent, the preferred view is that members’ entitlements to amounts due under their capital and current accounts are subordinated to the claims of external unsecured creditors. That said, it can be contended that members’ claims for advances or loans made to the LLP—despite being entered in their current accounts—stand on the same footing as those of external unsecured creditors. LLPs are established by the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 (LLPA 2000). In several respects, including insolvency, LLPs are akin to limited companies rather than partnerships; see: Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) and insolvency—overview. Where an LLP is insolvent, it is terminated by voluntary or compulsory winding-up. The winding-up regime under the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) operates alongside LLPA 2000, s 14 and the Limited Liability Partnerships Regulations 2001 (LLPR 2001), SI 2001/1090, reg 5 and LLPR 2001, SI 2001/1090, Sch 3 (as amended)...

Read More Right Arrow