Powered by Lexis+®
Related Content
CASE STUDY

“What I spend on my yearly subscription, equals to a day's billable hours for me not to mention time efficiency and peace of mind.”

Jai Stern

Access all documents on Peering

Peering meaning

What does Peering mean?
In legal and commercial practice, peering describes direct interconnection between Internet Service Providers (ISPs) or other network operators to exchange Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) routing announcements and carry traffic so each can reach the other’s customers. It is an industry term, not defined in UK or Irish legislation or case law, but widely used in telecoms contracts and regulatory discussions. Peering commonly occurs at Internet Exchange Points (IXPs) (public peering) or via private cross‑connects (private peering). Commercial models include settlement‑free peering and paid peering, documented in peering policies, memoranda of understanding, or formal peering agreements. It differs from IP transit, where a network pays another to reach third‑party destinations. Key legal features typically addressed are: capacity and traffic ratio thresholds, technical standards and change control, service levels or availability targets, security and incident coordination (including blackholing/filtering), fees and billing (if any), termination rights, and exclusions/limitations of liability. While peering is generally not subject to sector‑specific price or access regulation, arrangements must comply with competition law (e.g., Competition Act 1998, Irish Competition Act 2002, and EU/UK prohibitions on anti‑competitive agreements). Conduct by operators with market power may attract scrutiny by Ofcom or ComReg. Usage and practical effect are broadly consistent across England &...
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Peering

NEWS
Germany: Cologne court enforces paid peering; Meta reroutes via transit after €20m order amid EU ‘fair share’ debate and proposals for binding EU-wide arbitration on data transport disputes

For years, the firms have sparred over who should foot the bill for data traffic. Matters escalated in May 2023 when a Cologne court held that their contract must be honoured, obliging Meta to pay Deutsche Telekom roughly €20m for 'data transport services'. It also requires Meta to cover future charges for direct interconnection. Meta has maintained it should fall under a no‑cost 'peering' arrangement and owe Deutsche Telekom nothing. The German operator counters that Meta previously delivered its traffic over paid, direct links into its network. According to Deutsche Telekom, Meta halted those payments during the coronavirus (COVID‑19) pandemic. The company then brought legal action demanding settlement. After months of discussions following the judgment, Meta opted to send its data via a transit provider into the network instead of using the former direct path. The ruling confirmed obligations between them. Meta disputes obligation to remit such fees. Talks failed to resolve the impasse ahead of switching...

Read More Right Arrow