Possession meaning

Scope of this Checklist This Checklist sets out the points to consider when a company is proposing to grant a mortgage. It proceeds on the basis that an English or Welsh company will be granting a mortgage to a lender situated in England or Wales. In this Checklist: the company granting the mortgage is the 'mortgagor' the party to whom the mortgage is granted is the 'mortgagee' the document recording the mortgage is the 'security document' Preliminary questions before taking security by way of a mortgage Is a mortgage the right method of taking security? A mortgage transfers title to the asset, while preserving the mortgagor's equity of redemption so that, once sums due have been paid in full, title can be transferred back to the mortgagor (note that some mortgages, such as over land, are statutory, meaning there is no transfer of title). The use and possession of the asset will remain with...

Use this checklist when representing the seller in the disposal of a registered freehold residential property, whether offered with vacant possession or burdened by a lease or multiple leases. It is not comprehensive and will not address every eventuality in every transaction. You should always consider if there are additional matters that require attention. It does not purport to be a complete guide for every case. Preliminary matters Have you taken instructions from the client? Robust due diligence and effective transaction management depend on a clear grasp of the seller’s objectives and the proposed sale terms. Obtain full instructions, and clarify any elements of your brief that are unclear or out of the ordinary. Consider whether further specialist input is required; for example, planning advice where completion is conditional upon planning permission being secured. The table below sets out some of the principal points on which instructions should be obtained at the outset. This list is not comprehensive, and you may need to request information about additional...

Procedural Guide This Procedural Guide outlines the approach to applications made under section 17 of the Married Women’s Property Act 1882 (MWPA 1882) or section 66 of the Civil Partnership Act 2004 (CPA 2004), for spouses and civil partners, extended to former spouses, former civil partners and those previously engaged. MWPA 1882, s 17 and its civil partnership analogue allow the court to determine, in a summary fashion, disputes concerning title to or possession of property between spouses or civil partners. In practice, this route is seldom used given the extensive range of orders available under Part II of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 and CPA 2004, Sch 5. Applications may likewise be issued by former spouses and civil partners, and by individuals who were formerly engaged (technically, parties to a terminated agreement to marry or civil partnership agreement) within three years of the dissolution or annulment of the marriage or civil partnership, or the termination of the engagement. See Practice Note: Applications under the Married Women’s Property Act...

FORTHCOMING CHANGE : The Renters’ Rights Act 2025 obtained Royal Assent on 27 October 2025. For guidance on the Act’s effect on residential tenancies in England, see Practice Note: Renters’ Rights Act 2025—key provisions. This Flowchart outlines how to end an assured (AT) or assured shorthold tenancy (AST) via section 8 of the Housing Act 1988 (HA 1988), including: service of a section 8 notice issuing proceedings the steps in the case leading to an order for possession Where HA 1988 applies, unless the tenant agrees to leave voluntarily, a landlord may recover possession only by using the procedures in HA 1988, sections 8 or 21, obtaining an order for possession and enforcing it. See Practice Note: Assured and assured shorthold tenancies—terminating. The section 8 process is available where the tenant has defaulted on tenancy obligations (for example, failing to pay rent) or the landlord qualifies for possession on another HA 1988, Sch 2 ground, whether during a fixed...

FORTHCOMING CHANGE : The Renters’ Rights Act 2025 obtained Royal Assent on 27 October 2025. For insight into how it affects residential tenancies in England, refer to Practice Note: Renters' Rights Act 2025—key provisions. This Flowchart outlines the steps for ending an assured shorthold tenancy (AST) under section 21 of the Housing Act 1988 (HA 1988) via the standard possession route, covering when to serve a section 21 notice, when to issue proceedings, and the procedural milestones up to a possession order. Where HA 1988 governs, unless the tenant chooses to leave of their own accord, a landlord may regain possession only by following the mechanisms in HA 1988, ss 8 or 21, securing a possession order and enforcing it. For more detail, see Practice Note: Assured and assured shorthold tenancies—terminating. Under HA 1988, s 21, a landlord may terminate a fixed-term AST by giving the tenant no less than two months’ written notice, exercising a break clause during the term, or at the end of, or after the...

The flow diagram outlines when an executor might renounce probate, the effects this has on administering the estate, and which other individuals may apply for a grant instead, in their place. It also additionally covers the circumstance in which a proving sole, or sole-surviving, executor dies, and explains how the chain of representation interacts with renunciation by their own executor(s). If one of several appointed executors dies after obtaining a grant, but there remain surviving, proving executors named in that grant, those executors will carry on acting...

In this issue: Commercial real estate finance Leasing property Property management Residential tenancies Statutory compliance Property in Wales Additional property updates this week LexTalk®Property: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Trackers Commercial real estate finance Deliberate and unauthorised deed alteration renders legal charge void In Boult v Together Personal Finance Ltd [2026] EWHC 809 (Ch), the Chancery Division overturned the County Court at Cardiff, finding that the rule in Pigot’s Case rendered a legal charge void. The appeal turned on whether a unilateral, material change to a deed made after execution—without the other party’s knowledge or consent—invalidates it under the 400‑year‑old Pigot principle. The respondent, Together Personal Finance Limited, had lent money to the appellant, Ms Myranna Boult, secured against her property, and later commenced possession proceedings. Ms Boult maintained that the charge had been amended in manuscript post‑execution to incorporate an additional property without her...

In this issue: Key developments and horizon scanning Leasing property Statutory compliance Property development Property taxes Property in Wales LexTalk®Property: a Lexis®Nexis community Additional property updates this week Daily and weekly news alerts Trackers New Q&As Key developments and horizon scanning Law Society comments on Renters' Rights Bill The Law Society has issued its view on the Renters' Rights Bill, which had its second reading in the House of Lords on 4 February 2025. It broadly backs the planned changes—such as prohibiting ‘no-fault’ evictions and curbing rental bidding wars—but warns these aims risk faltering without clearer enforcement mechanisms and extra funding for the justice system. It also notes the reforms could prompt more contested hearings, since landlords will need to evidence valid grounds for possession, and a spike in claims as tenants gain greater scope to challenge evictions. The Law Society urges the government to set out how courts will be resourced...

In this issue: Disputes and remedies Neighbour and party wall disputes Enforcing security and property insolvency Property disputes in Scotland LexTalk®Property Disputes: a Lexis®Nexis community Additional Property disputes updates Daily and weekly news alerts Dates for your diary New and updated content Trackers Disputes and remedies Supreme Court confirms no tortious damages recoverable where the ‘but for’ causation test is unmet in relation to Japanese knotweed (Davies v Bridgend County Borough Council) In Davies v Bridgend County Borough Council [2024] All ER (D) 32 (May) [2024] UKSC 15, the Supreme Court unanimously allowed the appeal, holding that, applying the ‘but for’ test, compensation is not payable where the drop in value of the claimant’s land was not brought about by the defendant’s tortious acts, and therefore no award of damages is appropriate in such circumstances. The ruling matters particularly for claims where Japanese knotweed encroachment commenced before the duty to treat Japanese knotweed...

This Practice Note outlines the options open to landowners faced with unlawful occupation by a trespasser or squatter, the issues that can follow from trespass, and the potential measures the owner may pursue, including physical repossession. It considers the Criminal Law Act 1977 (CLA 1977) and the exception for displaced residential occupiers, the use of police powers to arrest where suitable, the effect of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO 2012) in criminalising residential squatting, injunctions and interim injunctions, and damages, including the negotiating damages approach, mesne profits, exemplary and aggravated damages, anticipated damages, and res judicata defences. The ways a landowner can recover possession from a trespasser include: physical repossession arrest of the trespasser by the police for a criminal offence injunction possession claim (including a claim for an interim possession order) Beyond the remedies available to recover possession, a landowner may also claim damages for the trespass. Such claims may involve negotiating damages,...

Trustees and personal representatives can, in fact, carry on a trade. For example, where a self-employed trader dies, the personal representative may keep the business running until it is wound down or sold. In the same way, trustees or interest in possession beneficiaries might be trading and could qualify for reliefs such as roll-over relief or business asset disposal relief. The broad tax rules governing trading apply to all traders alike, whether they are individuals, trustees, or personal representatives. This Practice Note sets out those principles below. Is there a trade? The key issue to examine is whether there is a trade. At times this will be clear, for instance when personal representatives step in to continue the deceased’s business; however, in other situations even a solitary transaction can amount to a trade. As an illustration, trustees who buy a property to renovate may, depending on the circumstances, be regarded as operating a property development business. If so, any gain on the later sale would fall within income...

General principles The trustees are, for tax purposes, regarded collectively as a single person, distinct from the individuals who serve as trustees from time to time. An interest in possession (IIP) means a beneficiary has an immediate right to the trust income as it arises. That income belongs to the beneficiary, and the trustees lack authority to retain it, save to meet proper expenses. Where trust income does not fall within the definition of accumulated or discretionary income in section 480 of the Income Tax Act 2007 (ITA 2007), it is treated as the income of ‘other persons’ and taxed at the basic and dividend rates. Ultimately, the income is assessed on the beneficiary at their personal rates, irrespective of when, and even whether, it is actually paid to them. Nevertheless, the trustees are liable to income tax on income arising from trust property because they are the legal owners of that property and thus the persons who receive the income. The way IIP and discretionary trusts are differentiated...

Your Ref: Our Ref: Date: From: [ insert name of landlord’s solicitor ] at [ insert address ] To: [ insert name of tenant or tenant’s solicitor ] at [ insert address ] Dear [ insert organisation name ] [ insert particulars of the lease ] (the ‘Lease’) relating to [ insert name of property ] (the ‘Property’) We act on behalf of [ insert name of client ], being [ your landlord OR your client’s landlord ] under the Lease. Please note that [ your OR your client’s ] Lease of the Property is scheduled to end on [ insert date of determination of the contractual term of the lease ]. Kindly arrange for [ you OR your client ] to yield up possession of the Property upon the Lease’s expiry. For the return of the keys, [ Our client’s OR Our client’s agent’s ] contact particulars are [ insert landlord or agent’s contact details ]. If you...

FORTHCOMING CHANGE : The Renters’ Rights Act 2025 was granted Royal Assent on 27 October 2025. For advice on the Act’s effect on residential tenancies in England, refer to Practice Note: Renters' Rights Act 2025—key provisions. Use this schedule to gather information on occupiers, occupation status, critical dates, notices to be issued, and principal points when planning a vacant possession strategy for a redevelopment. This Precedent is supplied in Excel format and can also be accessed via the link on this page. Note that the schedule has been created in Excel and therefore it cannot be downloaded into Word. Vacant Possession strategy—drafting notes If the development contains more than one freehold or superior leasehold interest, you may insert extra headings to divide the schedule into further sections where appropriate. Colour code: Sample colour coding has been applied to the first few rows as an example. Landlord: The named landlord should cover both: the direct landlord the...

FORTHCOMING CHANGE The Renters’ Rights Act 2025 obtained Royal Assent on 27 October 2025. For guidance on the Act’s effect on residential tenancies in England, see Practice Note: Renters’ Rights Act 2025—key provisions. Introduction The defence to a possession claim arising from non-payment of rent must be filed using Form N11R (defence form—rented residential premises). These drafting notes assist with properly completing Form N11R only...

Lease or licence? In Street v Mountford, the House of Lords set out the core indicators of a tenancy. These focus on the substance of the arrangement rather than the label attached to it: exclusive possession of specified premises Although the payment of rent may suggest a tenancy, it is not essential. Whether the proposed arrangement is a lease or a licence turns on the agreement taken as a whole; where the parties in reality confer exclusive possession, that result cannot be avoided by calling the document something else. What counts is the essence of the bargain, not its outward form or chosen description. Even where the paperwork is properly framed at the outset as a true licence, the parties’ subsequent behaviour may alter the character of the arrangement so that a tenancy is later created. For further discussion, see Practice Note: Leases and licences of land—key features and differences, together with the commentary in Hill and Redman’s Division A from paragraph...

Assured shorthold tenancies An Assured Shorthold Tenancy (AST) is a form of assured tenancy that permits a landlord to rent out a dwelling, while still keeping the ability to recover possession of the property once the term finishes. This differs from regulated and other assured tenancies, where the occupier might have a right to remain in the home when the term ends. For further detail, see Practice Note: A summary of types of private residential tenancies, under the heading A summary of types of private residential tenancies—Assured shorthold tenancies. As to how an AST arises, the starting position is that any residential letting granted on or after 28 February 1997 will, by default, be an AST, unless the landlord has served a notice on the tenant confirming that the tenancy will not be an AST...

Where a tenant makes an encroachment onto neighbouring land owned by a third party adjacent to the demised land, the appropriation is treated as accruing to the benefit of the tenant’s landlord. In Tower Hamlets LBC v Barrett [2006] P&CR 132 (not reported by LexisNexis®), Neuberger LJ observed at para [26] that the doctrine is clearly articulated in these terms: in every case—whether the enclosed land is part of the waste, belongs to the landlord, or is owned by someone else—the presumption is that the tenant enclosed it for the landlord’s advantage, unless the tenant has carried out some act disclaiming the landlord’s title...