Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“Although cost was an important factor, our relationship with LexisNexis, their responsiveness, flexibility, and the integration available with other products were key factors.”

Irwin Mitchell

Access all documents on Practice Statements

Practice Statements meaning

What does Practice Statements mean?
In UK public M&A practice, Practice Statements are short guidance notes from the Takeover panel executive explaining how it generally interprets and applies specific provisions of the UK Takeover Code in common fact patterns. They are not defined in legislation or case law: the term is the Panel’s own descriptive label for its informal guidance. Key features: - Non-binding and not part of the Code; they do not create rights, safe harbours or precedents and do not fetter the Panel’s discretion. - Not a substitute for consulting the Executive on a live matter; parties should still seek Panel rulings where appropriate. - Used by bidders, targets and advisers to anticipate Panel practice on issues such as timetables, disclosure, stakebuilding, Rule 9, frustrating action and concert parties. - Numbered, topic-based, and updated or withdrawn as practice evolves. Jurisdiction: Practice Statements apply to companies subject to the UK Takeover Code across England & Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. In Ireland, comparable non-binding guidance is issued by the Irish Takeover Panel under the Irish Takeover Rules, although terminology and content may differ. Access: Practice Statements are published on the Takeover Panel’s website and are typically collated alongside the Code materials.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Checklists about Practice Statements

CHECKLISTS
CPR PD 57AC trial witness statements: end-to-end checklist for legal representatives on planning, interviewing, drafting and compliance in the Business and Property Courts (England and Wales)

Introduction This Checklist is intended for legal representatives who are involved in directly assisting witnesses to prepare trial witness statements within the Business and Property Courts, and which are subject to CPR PD 57AC. This Checklist should be read alongside Practice Note: Trial witness statements in the Business and Property Courts under CPR PD 57AC, which sets out the requirements in fuller detail...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
UK securitisation regime timeline (2024–2026): from assimilated EU Securitisation Regulation to FCA/PRA rules, key regulations and policy statements, STS capital treatment extension, and FSB reforms evaluation.

This timeline shows key developments relating to the UK securitisation regime from January 2024 onwards For earlier milestones, see EU and UK Securitisation Regulations—timeline [Archived]. On 1 November 2024, Assimilated Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 (the UK Securitisation Regulation) no longer applied in the UK, and new securitisation rules issued by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) came into effect. For insight into the revised UK framework, see Practice Note: The UK securitisation regime. 2026 17 February 2026 — PRA/FCA CP2/26 – Reforms to securitisation requirements; CP26/6: Rules for reforming the UK Securitisation Framework; Applying the FSMA 2000 model of regulation to the Capital Requirements Regulation The PRA and FCA have opened consultations on changes to the UK securitisation framework. The FCA suggests simplifying reporting, disclosure and due diligence obligations. The PRA intends to lessen firms’ compliance load by making the regime less prescriptive and adjusting the capital treatment of loans under the Mortgage Guarantee...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
FCA/PRA SYSC and Rulebook Cross-Reference Checklist: Senior Management Arrangements, Systems and Controls (SM&CR, Outsourcing, Operational Resilience, Remuneration) United Kingdom

FCA and PRA senior management arrangements, systems and controls requirements The Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) expectations for senior management arrangements, systems and controls are outlined in the Senior Management Arrangements, Systems and Controls sourcebook (SYSC) within the FCA Handbook, as set out in SYSC. For the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), equivalent obligations appear across sections of the PRA Rulebook and in PRA Supervisory Statements (SSs). This checklist offers a mapping of the requirements in the various SYSC chapters alongside the corresponding senior management arrangements, systems and controls provisions contained in the PRA Rulebook and SSs. The mapping links each SYSC chapter to the parallel PRA materials. Details of the entities within the scope of SYSC are summarised in SYSC 1.1A.1G, and set out in full in SYSC 1 Annex 1 and in the relevant SYSC chapter...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Flowcharts about Practice Statements

FLOWCHARTS
Building and operating websites: IP and brand, regulatory, contractual and dispute issues—lawyers’ flowchart

Stage 1—preparing to bring a claim and pre-action matters Guidance on infringement, defences, ownership, injunctions, running disputes, and the Business and Property Courts Disclosure Scheme; cease and desist precedent; timetable checklist; key forms; IP insurance. Stage 2—letter of claim alleging copyright infringement Guidance on infringement, drafting letters of claim, unjustified threats and remedies, with precedents for standard and peer‑to‑peer infringement letters. Stage 3—commencing proceedings Notes on infringement, secondary infringement, permitted acts, remedies, criminal offences, the Business and Property Courts and the Disclosure Scheme; pleadings/initial disclosure precedents; Disclosure/IPEC flow tools; CPR claim/defence/settlement/default forms. Stage 4—case management Guidance on running disputes, costs management and the Disclosure Scheme; checklist; Chancery, Patents Court and IPEC Guides; Mitchell v NGN; core case‑management and disclosure forms. Stage 5—disclosure and evidence Notes on e‑disclosure, witness statements and the Disclosure Scheme; PD 57AC for Business and Property Courts trial statements (not...

Read More Right Arrow
FLOWCHARTS
Opposed business lease renewal under the LTA 1954: from s.25/s.26 notices to termination or new tenancy—procedural flowchart (England and Wales)

Opposed business lease renewal—flowchart This flowchart outlines the process for an opposed renewal of a business lease under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (LTA 1954). It covers timing for service of an opposed section 25 notice, or a section 26 request counter-notice identifying the ground(s) of opposition under LTA 1954, s 30(1), the commencement of opposed proceedings, filing statements of case, and the court’s ultimate order—termination or grant of a new lease, or discontinuance or dismissal of the claim If the tenant remains in occupation for business purposes after the contractual term ends, the lease continues automatically, provided the conditions in LTA 1954, s 23 are met Either party may end the statutory protection under the existing lease by serving a termination notice: landlord’s section 25 notice; tenant’s section 26 request; section 27 notice. This flowchart addresses opposed renewals only. For the unopposed renewal route, see: Unopposed lease renewal procedure—flowchart. Note 1: Diarise a date at least 12–18...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related News about Practice Statements

NEWS
UK and EU environmental law weekly: consultations, policy and case updates across climate, hydrogen, buildings, enforcement, nuclear, ESG, chemicals (PFAS), biodiversity, waste and water—9 October 2025

In this issue: Air emissions and climate change Contamination and pollution Energy efficiency and buildings Energy for environmental lawyers Environmental information Environmental taxes, reliefs and incentives ESG and sustainability Hazardous substances and chemicals Nature, biodiversity and habitat conservation Waste Water, flooding and drainage Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Air emissions and climate change Greenhouse Gas Removals (GGR)-UK government publishes Business Model documentation On 27 August 2025, the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) released a suite of papers on its proposed Greenhouse Gas Removals (GGR) Business Model and accompanying policy. The Lexis+ Energy team, working with Navraj Singh Ghaleigh, Senior Lecturer in Climate Law at the University of Edinburgh Law School, set out the context for the GGR Business Model; its relationship with the Power BECCS Business Model; the technologies the GGR framework intends to encompass; its legal footing and principal features; and how...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Civil and commercial dispute resolution weekly: CPR and FRC updates, AI regulation, cases on cryptoassets, defamation, jurisdiction clauses, privilege and expert evidence, plus consultations, guidance and dates—8 February 2024

In this issue: Key DR developments Claims and remedies Cross-border disputes Evidence and disclosure New content Dates for your diary Useful information Collaborate and network with a community of expert lawyers Daily and weekly news alerts Key DR developments 163rd Practice Direction update 163rd PD update—effective on 1 February and 6 April 2024: The 163rd Practice Direction (PD) changes to the Civil Procedure Rules have received approval from the Master of the Rolls together with the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK corporate crime weekly: LIBOR convictions quashed, OFSI enforcement reforms, crypto action, Criminal Procedure Rules 2025, ransomware proposals, water sector overhaul, NCA priorities, Companies House removals, 24 July 2025

In this issue: Investigating criminal conduct Criminal procedure and evidence Proceeds of crime Sentencing Bribery, corruption, sanctions and export controls Consumer protection and cartels Cybercrime and data protection offences Environmental offences Financial services and pensions offences Health and safety and corporate manslaughter offences Insolvency offences and Companies Act offences Money laundering International Other corporate crime news Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Useful information Investigating criminal conduct Standards of candour in closed hearings, and corporate witness statements (Attorney General v BBC; R (‘Beth’) v IPT) When scrutinising MI5’s actions across two High Court cases, the court addressed the grave consequences of presenting inaccurate material within closed hearings. It outlined the tightly confined situations that can justify a departure from open justice under section 6 of the Justice and Security Act 2013 (JSA 2013). The court further...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Practice Statements

PRACTICE NOTES
UK DTR 2: issuer obligations on disclosure, delay, control and selective disclosure of inside information—FCA/ESMA guidance, case law, COVID‑19 context and enforcement (post‑Brexit UK MAR)

Resource Note This Resource Note signposts key commentary, analysis and materials to aid interpretation and offer practical direction on using Chapter 2 of the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules (DTR 2). Where relevant, it draws on: the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) Handbook FCA Knowledge Base—Procedural and Technical notes (formal guidance binding on the FCA) FCA consultation and discussion papers, policy and feedback statements, and warnings Primary Market Bulletins and other FCA publications legacy UKLA technical and procedural notes and the UKLA’s newsletter List!, where still pertinent assimilated EU legislation EU Directives and EU Regulations, where helpful to construing a provision Lexis+® UK analysis and resources Setting the scene What it covers: DTR 2 prescribes the framework for issuers to disclose and manage inside information, supporting timely and even-handed release of market-sensitive information. It also identifies specific situations permitting a delay to public disclosure of inside information, together with the safeguards required to keep such information...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
UK FCA DTR 1–1C: application, post‑Brexit and 2024 listing reforms, MAR interplay, audit committees, misleading disclosures and related party rules

This Resource Note spotlights commentary, analysis and materials to aid interpretation and give practical guidance on applying Chapters 1, 1A, 1B and 1C of the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules: DTR 1, DTR 1A, DTR 1B and DTR 1C respectively. Materials referenced here include, where pertinent: the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) Handbook FCA Knowledge Base guidance—Procedural notes and Technical notes (constituting formal guidance and binding on the FCA) FCA consultation papers, discussion papers, policy statements, feedback statements and warnings Primary Market Bulletins and other FCA publications former UKLA technical and procedural notes and the UKLA newsletter List!, where still relevant to interpreting or applying a provision assimilated EU legislation EU Directives and EU Regulations, where relevant to interpreting a provision Lexis+ UK analysis and resources Setting the scene What it covers: DTR 1 sets out the Disclosure guidance, explaining its scope and purpose; DTR 1A sets out the transparency rules with their scope and purpose;...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
The Pensions Regulator's moral hazard powers: contribution notices and financial support directions: tests, procedure, reasonableness, guidance, case law, clearance and Pension Schemes Act 2021 criminal offences

The Pensions Regulator (the Regulator) The Regulator is an arm’s-length public body set up under the Pensions Act 2004 (PeA 2004). Its authority to impose contribution notices and financial support directions appears in PeA 2004, ss 38–50. Although the Act does not use the label, these provisions are widely known as the Regulator’s ‘moral hazard’ powers. Their purpose is to counter the ‘moral hazard’ arising from the Pension Protection Fund (PPF): the possibility that corporate groups might organise their structures so as to heighten exposure within their pension schemes, comfortable that the PPF would intervene if the employer entered insolvency. The principal moral hazard tools—and the only ones exercised so far—are the power to issue a contribution notice (CN) and the power to issue a financial support direction (FSD). A CN compels the recipient to pay a specified amount into a defined benefit occupational pension scheme. A CN can be issued where the criteria in PeA 2004, s 38 are satisfied. These mechanisms exist to deter behaviour that would...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about Practice Statements

PRECEDENTS
Fraud risk management and ethics: organisational code, procedures and reporting under the UK Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 failure to prevent fraud offence

[ Insert organisation name ] is proud of how we conduct our business. Our Code of ethics sets out the standards and policies that govern our operations and applies to everyone. Please read the Code carefully, make sure you understand it, and use it to guide your work. If you have any queries about the Code or its application, please speak with [ insert contact details ]. 1 What is fraud? 1.1 In broad terms, fraud is a criminal act involving deception or theft to secure an advantage. 1.2 The failure to prevent fraud offence under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA 2023) covers a wide range of fraud offences carried out for the benefit of our organisation, including: fraud by false representation fraud by failing to disclose information fraud by abuse of position obtaining services dishonestly participation in a fraudulent business false statements by company directors false accounting fraudulent trading cheating the...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Family Court Financial Remedies Directions and Case Management Order (Long Form Precedent) with Disclosure, Expert, Valuation, Pensions and Costs Directions – England and Wales

In the Family Court sitting at [ Court name ] Case no: [ Case number ] Proceedings under: The Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 The Civil Partnership Act 2004 The Child Support Act 1991 Schedule 1 to the Children Act 1989 The Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 The Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 and Schedule 7 to the Civil Partnership Act 2004 The Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 The Married Women’s Property Act 1882 and ss 67, 68 and 74 of the Civil Partnership Act 2004 OR [ (DELETE AS APPROPRIATE) ] The [ Marriage OR Civil Partnership OR Relationship OR Family ] of [ applicant name ] and [ respondent name ] Heard [ name the advocate(s) who appeared ]; considered documents filed by the parties [ [ (IN THE CASE OF AN ORDER MADE WITHOUT NOTICE) ] read the statements and heard the witnesses...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Lease of bare land to telecommunications operator under the legacy Electronic Communications Code: archived precedent (England and Wales)

LR1. Date of the lease [ enter the date in full format DD-Month-Year ] LR2. Title Number[s] LR2.1 Landlord's title number [ s ] [ the title numbers from which this lease is granted. Leave blank if unregistered ] LR2.2 Other title numbers [ existing title number [ s ] against which entries relating to LR9, LR10, LR11 and LR13 are to be made ] LR3. Parties to this lease Landlord [ enter landlord's name and address ] Tenant [ enter tenant's name and address ] Other parties LR4. Property Where this clause conflicts with any other part of the lease, then, for registration purposes, this clause shall take precedence. [ enter details of the Property ] LR5. Prescribed statements etc LR5.1 Statements prescribed under rules 179 (dispositions in favour of a charity), 180 (dispositions by a charity) or 196 (leases under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Q&As about Practice Statements

Q&As
EL Multi-track: Adjourned Amend Defence/Part 18—Witness Evidence, Breach and Extension Refusal

At the heart of the query lies the status of a party who does not adhere to a court direction, yet has lodged an application to extend the time for compliance before the expiry of the deadline attached to that direction. On the scenario set out, the claimant will be in breach of the court order concerning the exchange of witness statements in two weeks’ time, because that order will not have been varied before the deadline for compliance under that order...

Read More Right Arrow
Q&As
Refused financial consent order: renegotiation, resubmission and binding effect of original agreement

The court's role when considering a draft financial consent order When a draft financial consent order is presented for approval, the court does more than merely endorse what is put before it. It is obliged to examine the proposed terms and, relying on the details set out in the parties’ statements of information, may still seal an order in the agreed form, unless it has cause to suspect there are further circumstances that merit enquiry. The court’s discretion, preserved by the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, always applies and is not displaced. Clients should be made aware of this position and cautioned that it cannot be guaranteed the court will approve the order (see Pounds v Pounds)...

Read More Right Arrow
Q&As
Relief from sanctions for late/defective list of documents?

CPR 31.10 contains provisions for the disclosure of documents by way of a list. Obligations to disclose continue until the case is concluded. If additional documents are discovered after a list has been served, a supplementary list must be provided (CPR PD 31A, para 3.3). For broader guidance on disclosure, see Practice Notes: Disclosure under CPR 31—introduction and Disclosure—standard disclosure and the reasonable search. When issuing directions, the court will fix the deadline by which the list must be served on the other party. CPR 31.21: a party cannot rely on a document it has not disclosed unless the court grants permission. CPR 32.10 (witness statements) and CPR 35.13 (experts’ reports) are framed so that, upon default, court permission is required to adduce or rely on that evidence. This points to an application for permission, rather than an application for relief from sanctions, being the more suitable course where these kinds of breaches arise...

Read More Right Arrow