Prescribed rules meaning

Administrator appointed by the court Where the court appoints an administrator under paragraph 11 of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986), following an application by the company, its directors and/or one or more creditors, the title deeds should include certified copies of: the administration order; and any further order(s) under IA 1986, Sch B1, paras 91–95 appointing a new administrator after the death, resignation or removal from office of the original or any later administrator Administrator appointed by holder(s) of qualifying charge, the company or its directors Where the administrator is appointed by the holder(s) of a qualifying floating charge (IA 1986, Sch B1, para 14) or by the company or its directors (IA 1986, Sch B1, para 22), the title deeds should include certified copies of: the notice of appointment: in a form complying with IA 1986, Sch B1, para 14 and the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules...

Use this checklist to identify which EU Member State’s courts are competent to hear a dispute. It does so by referencing the provisions of Regulation (EU) 1215/2012, Brussels I (recast), applied to allocate jurisdiction. The starting point is that proceedings should be brought against a defendant in the courts of the Member State where they are domiciled. That position is displaced by various specific rules. Some of those exceptions bite automatically, while others operate only where the claimant elects to invoke them. The articles are applied in the hierarchy shown in the table below: if the first provision is not engaged, consider the next, and proceed accordingly... Determining jurisdiction Type of jurisdiction Consideration Mandatory/by choice Brussels I (recast) Exclusive jurisdiction: in certain prescribed situations, the courts of an EU Member State have jurisdiction irrespective of any contrary party agreement or of the parties’ domicile...

This Checklist sets out the particulars that a tenant or landlord must provide when applying to the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) (FTT) under the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules (the Property Chamber Rules), SI 2013/1169. It specifically outlines the prescribed information required where the application relates to the right to enfranchise or obtain a lease extension of a property under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 (LRA 1967), and the specific documents to accompany such claims. Details needed solely for applications brought under different statutes are excluded. Rule 8 permits the tribunal to waive or ease compliance with the Property Chamber Rules, practice directions or tribunal directions, where proportionate in the circumstances, where it is content that the particulars and documents supplied with an application are adequate for determining it, and that no party has suffered, or is likely to suffer, prejudice. All applications to the FTT The particulars to be included...

In this issue: Horizon scanning Recruitment Public sector Pay Tax Protected characteristics Equality of terms (equal pay) Whistleblowing Employee duties and restrictions on competition Unfair dismissal Employment Tribunals Dates for your diary Trackers New Q&As Employment resources on Lexis+® LexTalk®Employment: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts Horizon scanning Government U-turns on day-one unfair dismissal rights and announces compensation cap ‘will be lifted’ On 27 November 2025, the Department for Business and Trade (DBT) confirmed that, following a round of ‘constructive conversations’ with trade unions and business representatives, the discussions settled on a ‘workable package’: shortening the unfair dismissal qualifying period from two years to six months, while preserving existing day-one protection against discrimination and for automatically unfair reasons for dismissal. To reinforce these safeguards, the government further pledged that any alteration to the unfair dismissal qualifying period will only be possible through primary legislation,...

In this issue: Enforcing security and property insolvency Service charges Disputes and remedies Repairing obligations and dilapidations Residential tenancies Rent and rates Contractual issues Additional Property Disputes updates LexTalk®Property Disputes: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Latest Q&As Enforcing security and property insolvency Applications for possession and sale of the family home in bankruptcy (Armstrong v Temblett) The matter involved an application by Mr Armstrong, acting as trustee in bankruptcy (the trustee), seeking an order for possession and sale of Mrs Vanessa Temblett’s London property, jointly owned with her husband (the London property). The court determined that, under section 335A of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986), the trustee was entitled to possession and sale, as no exceptional circumstances were identified to rebut the statutory presumption that creditors’ interests prevail over other factors. The judgment highlights the need for practitioners...

In this issue: Social housing Education Planning Local government finance Public procurement Governance Healthcare Social care Licensing Environmental law and climate change LexTalk®Local Government: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Social housing Local authority successful in Court of Appeal on suitability of accommodation offered in performance of prevention duty (Fatolahzadeh v LB of Barnet) Fatolahzadeh v LB of Barnet saw Genevieve Screeche-Powell represent the council, which prevailed in resisting a Housing Act 1996 (HA 1996), section 204 appeal pursued by a homeless applicant. Two central issues of principle arose: (i) whether Parliament intended that an alleged non-compliance with the ‘new’ HA 1996, s 189A duties should automatically vitiate any later decision taken to meet the duty to secure suitable accommodation; and (ii) the extent to which the section 202 review procedure can rectify asserted shortcomings. This marks the first occasion on which the Court...

Proving the identity of the driver Where the bench is satisfied the defendant was served with a notice under section 172 of the Road Traffic Act 1988, and the court receives a statement from the defendant admitting they were the driver, that statement is accepted as proof of identity. If no such admission exists—either because a RTA 1988, s 172 notice was not properly served in line with the Criminal Procedure Rules 2025 (CrimPR 2025), SI 2025/909, Pt 4, or the allegation is not one to which section 172 applies—the magistrates will look to other material. Information provided by the registered keeper to police during interview or questioning Entries held on the police national database See: Creed v Scott [1976] RTR 485 (not reported by LexisNexis®) and DPP v Bayliff [2003] EWHC 539 (Admin) (not reported by LexisNexis®). Details supplied to the police may suffice to prove who was driving; it is immaterial whether a driving licence is produced to confirm name...

This Practice Note outlines when someone can become liable to a VAT-related penalty. A person charged with a VAT penalty may have a right of appeal; for guidance on appeal rules, see Practice Note: Appealing an HMRC decision. Civil penalties There are two broad types of civil penalties: those arising from failure to meet basic compliance obligations, and those stemming from more serious conduct or omissions This Practice Note highlights the principal penalties in each group; for a comprehensive list, consult the further reading link to De Voil Indirect Tax Service [V5.332]. Civil penalties are issued by HMRC through assessment; for general information on assessments, see Practice Note: VAT assessments. Penalties for basic compliance failures Penalties apply where a taxpayer does not meet core VAT compliance duties, including: breach of regulations made under VATA 1994. These regulations set out detailed collection and payment rules, so most administrative mistakes are covered. Failure to carry out specific obligations,...

A limited liability partnership (LLP) A limited liability partnership (LLP) is a corporate body established under the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 (LLPA 2000). Most rules governing LLPs derive from modified company law rather than partnership law (see Practice Note: The nature of a limited liability partnership and its legal framework). The requirements for incorporation are prescribed in the LLPA 2000 and the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006), as adapted by the Limited Liability Partnerships (Application of Companies Act 2006) Regulations 2009, SI 2009/1804 (LLP (Application of CA 2006) Regs 2009). The method for forming an LLP closely mirrors the procedure for company incorporation...

LR1. Date of the lease [ enter the date in full format DD-Month-Year ] LR2. Title Number[s] LR2.1 Landlord's title number [ s ] [ the title numbers from which this lease is granted. Leave blank if unregistered ] LR2.2 Other title numbers [ existing title number [ s ] against which entries relating to LR9, LR10, LR11 and LR13 are to be made ] LR3. Parties to this lease Landlord [ enter landlord's name and address ] Tenant [ enter tenant's name and address ] Other parties LR4. Property Where this clause conflicts with any other part of the lease, then, for registration purposes, this clause shall take precedence. [ enter details of the Property ] LR5. Prescribed statements etc LR5.1 Statements prescribed under rules 179 (dispositions in favour of a charity), 180 (dispositions by a charity) or 196 (leases under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban...

Precedent Transfer A flexible Word edition of the TR1 precedent can be downloaded, stored or printed using the link on this page. Drafting notes to precedent transfer General Any mention of ‘panels’ in these drafting notes refers to the panels in HM Land Registry form TR1. The TR1 is the prescribed document, under the Land Registration Rules 2003, for transferring the whole of freehold or leasehold land. Form TR1 can also be used for transfers of the entirety of unregistered land where the disposition triggers compulsory registration, or where the transferee is certain that a voluntary application for registration will be made...

Precedent Transfer An editable Word edition of the TR1 precedent can be obtained via the link directly on this page, downloaded, then saved or printed if and when needed. Drafting notes to precedent transfer – General: Any mention of ‘Panels’ in these drafting notes relates to the panels in HM Land Registry form TR1. TR1 is the prescribed instrument for transferring the entirety of freehold or leasehold land under the Land Registration Rules 2003. The form may likewise be used to transfer the whole of unregistered land where the disposition triggers compulsory registration, or where the transferee intends to submit a voluntary application for registration...

This Q&A This Q&A explores the steps administrators should take to contest a landlord’s attempt to forfeit a lease by peaceable re-entry, carried out unaware of an interim moratorium triggered by lodging a notice of intention to appoint administrators (NOI). An NOI is to be lodged by the directors or the company in advance of making an out of court appointment pursuant to Schedule B1, paragraph 22, of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986). This Q&A does not address a case where no NOI has been lodged. Where a company or its directors intend to appoint an administrator via the out of court route, they begin by filing an NOI, which imposes an interim moratorium under IA 1986, Sch B1, paras 44(2), 44(4). After the NOI is placed before the court, notice must also be served on the ‘prescribed persons’, including any party known to have levied distress against the company or its assets (Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016, SI 2016/1024, r 3.23(4); IA 1986, Sch B1, para...

In England, landlords cannot serve a section 21 notice while they are failing to meet prescribed regulatory duties, as set out in section 21A(1) of the Housing Act 1988 (HA 1988). Where any such duty is breached, service is barred. The rules currently in effect are the Assured Shorthold Tenancy Notices and Prescribed Requirements (England) Regulations 2015, SI 2015/1646. Compliance requires the landlord to supply the tenant with: an energy performance certificate, under the Energy Performance of Buildings (England and Wales) Regulations 2012, SI 2012/3118; a gas safety certificate, under the Gas Safety (Installation and Use) Regulations 1998, SI 1998/2451; and a copy of ‘How to rent: the checklist for renting in England’, published by the Department for Communities and Local Government as required...

Where H died with a domicile outside England and Wales, the South African grant might be capable of being resealed in England and Wales so that H’s UK property can be dealt with without making a fresh application for a grant; see Practice Note: Resealing of foreign grants, for further reference. By contrast, if H was domiciled in England and Wales at death, an application for letters of administration will be required here, since the power to administer an estate in England and Wales rests on holding a grant of representation, accordingly. Anyone who, under the Non-Contentious Probate Rules 1987 (NCPR 1987), SI 1987/2024, has priority to a grant may apply for a grant of letters of administration. The ranking of entitlement mirrors the order applicable on intestacy and is prescribed in NCPR 1987, SI 1987/2024, r 22...