“What I spend on my yearly subscription, equals to a day's billable hours for me not to mention time efficiency and peace of mind.”
Jai SternAccess all documents on Product Carbon Footprint
In this issue: Access to environmental justice Air pollution and climate change Product energy efficiency Environmental disputes and proceedings Environmental enforcement and prosecutions Environmental information Hazardous substances and chemicals Nature, biodiversity and habitat conservation Free webinar: ‘The Future of Environmental Law’ Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Access to environmental justice Judgment Alert: HM Treasury v Global Feedback Ltd (WWF UK intervening) [2025] EWCA Civ 624. This appeal was before the Court of Appeal. The key question concerned the meaning of Article 9(3) of the Aarhus Convention, addressing public access to justice in environmental matters. Article 9 obliges each Party to ensure the public can use administrative or judicial routes to challenge acts or omissions by private persons and public bodies that breach provisions of its national law relating to the environment. The court concluded that Article 9(3) applies only where the alleged breach is of a national legal rule...
This Practice Note reviews current and forthcoming rules shaping TMT and examines leading organisations influencing sector benchmarks. It identifies the organisations most influential on evolving industry norms and compliance expectations. It then considers technology’s environmental effects and sets out actions and openings the TMT industries will probably need to adopt to progress towards a sustainable future. The discussion frames both risks and opportunities for TMT as it charts a path towards sustainability. It outlines the part played by the telecoms and media sectors in assessing their environmental footprint and how they might promote sustainable practices. It also reflects on how these sectors can promote greener practices across operations. It concludes by signposting ways companies can tackle sustainability across internal policies and practices, supply chains and the use of technology. For sustainable business guidance, see: ESG and sustainability collection. Many TMT businesses are still expanding, driven by technological progress and wider access, the digital transformation of business, and the cross‑sector dominance of major tech firms. Although unchecked growth can endanger the...
Precedent Target product carbon footprint clause—schedule for consumer goods contracts Use this schedule within a manufacturing contract for the supply of consumer goods to oblige the parties to adopt a target product carbon footprint budget—one that diminishes over time—for each product manufactured and supplied pursuant to the contract. The clause is consistent with the Paris Agreement objectives, the Race to Zero criteria, and the Oxford Principles for Net Zero Aligned Carbon Offsetting as stated. This sustainability wording was created by The Chancery Lane Project (TCLP) as ‘Ming’s clause’ and is accessible via TCLP’s website below, where the linked text appears for reference. For comprehensive and relevant guidance on target product carbon footprint budgets, please consult the TCLP clause for direction as needed. TCLP is the codename for a focused, collaborative initiative of lawyers from around the world to craft new contracts and model legislation to tackle climate change. For further details, visit: chancerylaneproject.org. Lexis+® is proud to support the work of TCLP...