Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“It really is saving us a huge number of hours over the days, weeks and months. Having more relevant support at hand, not having to draft or review documents them from scratch - it all adds up.”

Southampton FC

Access all documents on Profit costs

Profit costs meaning

What does Profit costs mean?
Profit costs are the solicitor’s own professional fees for work done on a matter, excluding sums paid to third parties (disbursements/outlays such as counsel’s fees, court fees and experts’ charges). The term is not defined in legislation but is a long‑standing costs expression used in bills of costs, costs schedules and assessments/taxations across the UK and Ireland, and recognised in case law and practice guides. Profit costs usually comprise time‑based charges (hourly rates), fixed or agreed fees, and a component reflecting the firm’s overheads. They are payable by the client or recoverable inter partes, subject to reasonableness and proportionality on assessment/taxation. England and Wales: assessed under CPR 44–47 and the Solicitors Act 1974, with reference to guideline hourly rates and the standard or indemnity basis, in the Senior Courts Costs Office. Scotland: taxed by the Auditor of Court by reference to the Tables of Fees; third‑party payments are “outlays”. Northern Ireland: assessed by the Taxing Office under the Rules of the Court of Judicature (NI), using similar concepts to England and Wales. Ireland: adjudicated by a Legal Costs Adjudicator under the Legal Services Regulation Act 2015; “professional fees” broadly equate to profit costs, with third‑party payments treated as “outlays”. Usage is therefore...
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Profit costs

NEWS
Commercial Court grants defendant summary judgment on damages quantification; net loss approach requires credit for intra‑group costs (CPR 24.2 ‘particular issue’) in Palmali v Litasco (England and Wales)

Palmali Shipping SA v Litasco SA [2020] EWHC 2581 (Comm) What are the practical implications of this case? This judgment carries two key consequences. First, Foxton J determined that the court can grant summary judgment, on the pleaded approach, for the quantification of damages in a breach of contract, even where the defendant is unable to show that no damages are recoverable at all. A dispute over the proper methodology for assessing loss amounts to a ‘particular issue’ within CPR 24.2. Second, the court considered the so‑called ‘net loss approach’ to damages. Where a claimant bears a legal obligation to third‑party companies for costs incurred in performing the contract, those expenditures must be credited when arriving at the net loss claimed against the defendant, even if those third‑party companies have the same beneficial owner as the claimant and even if, in practice, such companies did not ordinarily insist on payment... What was the background? Palmali...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK Dispute Resolution: Break costs and misrepresentation, Hunter/Jameel strike-out, expert evidence, LPP in SRA cases, Hague Choice of Court, court backlog proposals—Weekly update, 27 June 2024

In this issue: Key DR developments Claims and remedies Cross border disputes Applications Evidence and disclosure New content Dates for your diary Useful information Daily and weekly news alerts Key DR developments Court and the legal profession Both principal political parties set out proposals in their manifestos for the general election to ease the escalating backlog in the nation’s courts, yet practitioners in England and Wales still have a few more items on their wish list for the incoming administration and would like them considered. For more detail, see Law360 Analysis: Lawyers set out wishlist for next UK government. Claims and remedies Contractual breach and remedies—misrepresentation and contractual construction In claims arising out of the sales of fixed interest rate business loans before 2010, Mr Justice Zacaroli, in Farol Holdings Ltd v Clydesdale Bank plc and National Australia Bank [2024] EWHC 593 (Ch) (a judgment delivered in March), addressed whether: (i)...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Civil dispute resolution update—AI guidance, CPRC developments, Equality Act ruling, injunctions, class action funding, enforcement reform, service and court fees: key cases, resources and diary dates (17 April 2025)

In this issue: Key DR developments Claims and remedies Costs and funding Injunctions Enforcement Litigation New content Dates for your diary Useful information Daily and weekly news alerts No Weekly Highlights on 24 April 2025 Key DR developments Artificial intelligence CTJ issues refreshed AI guidance and unveils Copilot Chat for judges: The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary (CTJ) has released updated guidance on the use of artificial intelligence, replacing the December 2023 version. The revision widens the glossary of AI terminology and introduces fresh sections on misinformation, bias, and the quality of datasets. It also brings Microsoft Copilot Chat to judicial office holders via eJudiciary accounts, and confirms that litigants are accountable for AI-generated material put before the courts. For further detail, see: LNB News 15/04/2025 23—Courts and Tribunals Judiciary publishes updated AI guidance and introduces Copilot Chat for judges...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Profit costs

PRACTICE NOTES
Using OTC derivatives to hedge risks in lending transactions: interest rate, currency and commodity swaps, counterparties and costs

The most common reasons for entering into derivatives are for the purposes of: Speculation — when a party seeks exposure to a given variable, for example taking a view on a commodity’s future price on the assumption it will rise or fall over a chosen period Hedging — aiming to offset exposure to the risk of an unfavourable shift in a variable, or to stabilise expected outcomes over time Arbitrage — seeking to take advantage of price discrepancies (between markets, or within the same market over time) to earn profit or cut costs, or where one participant can reach a price or market unavailable to another, including where prices differ over time Exposure to asset classes — obtaining access to a target market (eg commodities, shares, property) without incurring the expense, complexity and formalities associated with those markets, avoiding the same costs and complications Derivatives are commonly used alongside lending arrangements for hedging purposes in practice. In this context, the primary...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
UK purchaser acquiring an overseas business: tax considerations on acquisition, profit repatriation, structuring, exit, anti-avoidance and compliance

A UK-based purchaser of an overseas business should evaluate the following tax considerations: the prospective overseas and UK tax outlays linked to the acquisition tax-efficient ways to repatriate profits from the overseas entity to the UK buyer a tax-efficient exit strategy maximising the tax-efficiency of the target business This Practice Note is written from a UK tax perspective and also flags typical overseas tax points to address, including reporting, filing and compliance obligations. Local advice should be obtained in each jurisdiction in which the target operates. Overseas and UK tax costs associated with the acquisition of an overseas business The common UK and overseas tax costs relevant to acquiring an overseas business are summarised below. Transfer taxes Share acquisitions may attract local transfer or registration taxes, usually calculated as a percentage of the consideration for those shares, together with notary fees...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
England social housing finance for Registered Providers: financial covenants, security valuation (EUV-SH/MV-T), sector-specific terms, interest rate options and Spens break costs

This Practice Note explores the principal legal terms typical of social housing finance and what distinguishes them from financing in other sectors. It focuses on standard financial covenants and other sector‑specific provisions, including events of default, together with terms linked to the availability of long‑term fixed rate interest options. For more on social housing finance transactions, see Practice Notes: Social housing entities entering into finance transactions Key deal structures in social housing finance Taking and enforcing security from social housing entities This Practice Note concentrates solely on private not‑for‑profit providers of social housing registered in England (referred to as ‘RPs’), as they comprise the vast majority of private debt finance raised by housing associations to date. It does not cover providers registered in Wales. Financial covenants—introduction The principal financial covenants in social housing finance are: loan to value gearing interest cover (less commonly) net rental income cover from charged properties Loan...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about Profit costs

PRECEDENTS
Buyer-favourable warranty and tax covenant limitations schedule for corporate seller SPAs: periods, caps, de minimis, specific exclusions, claims conduct, third-party recoveries and mitigation

Insert the following as new definitions (if not already included) in the definitions and interpretation clause of the share purchase agreement: 1 Definitions and interpretation Fairly Disclosed • means information [ fully, fairly and accurately ] disclosed [ (relating specifically to the subject matter of the Warranty and without omitting any fact which may render the Warranty and the matter disclosed untrue, inaccurate and misleading) ] and presented with sufficient clarity and detail to allow a buyer to reach a clear, informed and accurate evaluation of the relevant facts, matters or circumstances concerned; Losses • means any and all liabilities, costs, outgoings (including legal expenses), claims, actions, proceedings, damages, fines, penalties, loss of profit [ and Consequential Loss ]; Tax Warranties • denotes the warranties [ and representations ] contained in paragraph [ insert number ] of Schedule [ insert number ], and Tax Warranty refers to any one of them; Warranties • signifies the warranties [ and representations ] included in Schedule [...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Sanctions compliance clauses for commercial contracts: long-form warranties, due diligence, suspension/termination, indemnity; short-form performance and affiliates/ownership options

1 Sanctions (long form) For clause 1, the following terms are to be interpreted as set out below: Losses means all damages, liabilities, demands, costs and expenses [including all legal and other professional fees, costs and expenses], claims, actions and proceedings [(including all consequential, direct, indirect, special or incidental loss or punitive damages or loss, fines, penalties, interest and loss of profit or any other form of economic loss (including loss of reputation))]; Sanctioned Activity means any activity that falls within sanctions imposed by a Sanctioning Body; Sanctioning Body means the United Kingdom, United States of America, United Nations, European Union and any other applicable local, national or multinational government agency, department, official, parliament, public or statutory person or any government or professional body, regulatory or supervisory authority, board or other body responsible for imposing and/or administering sanctions; Sanctioned Entity means any person or entity that is, or that is owned or controlled directly or indirectly by a person or entity that is,...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Precedent Owner–Developer Property Development Agreement (England and Wales): planning condition, building contract, collateral warranties/nominations, CDM compliance, payment (HGCRA), liquidated damages, insurance, defects, profit share

Date [ date ] Parties [ name of Owner ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) whose registered office is at ] [ address ] (Owner) [ name of Developer ] [ of OR incorporated in England and Wales (company registration number [ number ]) whose registered office is at ] [ address ] (Developer) 1 Definitions Adjudication Date – the day on which any adjudicator appointed under HGCRA 1996 to determine a dispute regarding an amount due to: (a) the Developer under this Agreement; or (b) the Building Contractor under the Building Contract; delivers their decision; [ Adverse Rights – any easement, covenant, right or other interest affecting the Property, the release, discharge or variation of which is reasonably required to assist the Works or the use and occupation of the Development; ] [ Adverse Rights Agreement – any document that gives legal effect to the release,...

Read More Right Arrow