Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Related Content
CASE STUDY

“We rely on LexisNexis to give us a definitive answer, quickly and reliable every time so that we can be confident in the advice we use to help our clients.”

Shelter

Access all documents on Profit signature

Profit signature meaning

What does Profit signature mean?
In insurance practice, a profit signature describes the expected timing and pattern of losses and profits over a policy’s lifetime, usually shown as a graph. It typically displays a significant first‑year loss (the new business strain, reflecting acquisition costs, initial capital and set‑up expenses), followed by a series of smaller profits in later years. It is generated by actuaries through profit testing during product design and pricing. Legal professionals encounter profit signatures in product approval files, board papers, due diligence, reinsurance negotiations and transfers of insurance business (including FSMA Part VII and Irish court‑sanctioned schemes), where they evidence profit emergence, capital requirements and policyholder value. They support regulatory assessments under Solvency II and FCA Consumer Duty “fair value” considerations, and may inform with‑profits or unit‑linked charging structures, surrender terms and commission recovery. The term is not defined in legislation or case law; it is an actuarial expression used consistently across England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland. Sensitivity analyses around the profit signature (for example, lapses, mortality, expenses and investment returns) are commonly reviewed to test resilience and to underpin warranties, disclosures and risk allocation in transactional documents.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Profit signature

NEWS
JCT contract formation and loss of profit: TCC prefers contemporaneous documents, rejects forged-signature and oral-contract defences; 20% profit awarded absent pleaded alternative (Ubhi v Aspire, England and Wales)

Ubhi Construction Ltd v Aspire Enterprises (UK) Ltd [2024] EWHC 1089 (TCC) What are the practical implications of this case? A number of practical points arise in real practice: The primacy of contemporaneous correspondence and records is paramount; testimony that is incoherent or misaligned with contemporaneous facts will lack credibility Leaving a pivotal document or material fact unaddressed in a witness statement alerts the court, enabling the Judge to draw a clear adverse inference with ease...

Read More Right Arrow