Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“LexisNexis is great as I can find the answers I am looking for really quickly. I believe that nothing should be more than 6 clicks away - and the products from LexisNexis deliver on this standard”

Avensure

Access all documents on Prohibited dealings

Prohibited dealings meaning

What does Prohibited dealings mean?
In public takeovers, prohibited dealings describes transactions in the offeree company’s securities that must not be carried out during the offer period. The term is used by practitioners to refer to the restrictions in the UK Takeover Code, in particular Rule 4.1, which sets out prohibitions on dealings in the offeree’s securities by anyone other than the offeror. “Dealing” is broadly defined under the Code and captures purchases, sales, options and derivative transactions that create long or short economic exposure. These restrictions are intended to preserve an orderly market and equal treatment of shareholders, and operate alongside the criminal insider dealing regime under the Criminal Justice Act 1993 and the market abuse regime under the UK Market Abuse Regulation (UK MAR). Breaches may attract intervention and disciplinary action by the Panel on Takeovers and Mergers, in addition to any criminal or regulatory exposure under insider dealing or market abuse laws. In Ireland, the concept is broadly equivalent under the Irish Takeover Rules administered by the Irish Takeover Panel and must be considered with the EU Market Abuse Regulation and applicable Irish criminal insider dealing laws. Usage is consistent across England & Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about Prohibited dealings

NEWS
FINMA restricts HSBC’s Swiss private bank: ban on new PEP relationships pending review after AML failings; audit agent appointed; appeal planned

FINMA on HSBC Private Bank (Suisse) SA The Swiss Financial Markets Supervisory Authority (FINMA) reported that HSBC Private Bank (Suisse) SA maintained risky business relationships with two politically exposed persons, meaning publicly prominent figures. According to the regulator, the bank did not carry out proper checks on the assets involved — the due diligence process — nor did it adequately record transactions. In its review, FINMA stated the bank failed to recognise signs of money laundering evident in these dealings. It also did not meet the requirements for starting and maintaining customer relationships with politically exposed persons, constituting a serious breach of its due diligence duties. HSBC Private Bank (Suisse) SA, operating in Zurich and Geneva, is owned by UK-based HSBC Bank Plc, a wholly owned subsidiary of HSBC Holdings Plc. FINMA has consequently prohibited the bank from entering into new relationships with politically exposed persons...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Prohibited dealings

PRACTICE NOTES
Acting in Concert under the UK Takeover Code: 2023 Presumptions, Control, Aggregation, Rule 9 Mandatory Offers, Disclosure Duties, and Guidance on Funds, Private Equity and Consortium Offers

Produced with input from Rebecca Cousin of Slaughter and May on market practice. This Practice Note succinctly outlines the relevant rules and guidance concerning parties who are, or are deemed likely to be, acting in concert for the purposes of The City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (the Code). In particular, the note reviews the various relationships that may amount to acting in concert, the importance of concert parties for Rule 9 of the Code, and the disclosures required in connection with stakebuilding. Stakebuilding is not prohibited by the Code, but can carry significant implications. The effects of membership of a concert party will typically be engaged under Rules 4 (Restrictions on dealings), 5 (Timing restrictions on acquisitions), 6 (Acquisitions resulting in an obligation to offer a minimum level of consideration), 8 (Disclosure of dealings and positions), 9 (The Mandatory offer and its terms) and 11 (Nature of consideration to be offered) when any of the relevant parties acquires shares...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
UK public takeovers: share dealings and stakebuilding before and during an offer - restrictions and obligations under the Takeover Code, UK MAR and related law

Dealing in shares and related interests Trading in shares and associated interests of the offeree and of any offeror or would-be offeror, whether ahead of or during an offer, can carry material weight in a public takeover, as each side looks to secure tactical or strategic leverage by building up (or divesting) positions over time if feasible. This is often most acute in contested bids, or where the offeror seeks the offeree board’s endorsement of the transaction in particular. Any securities dealings connected to a takeover bid, before, during, or after the offer period, may fall under legal and regulatory constraints that can restrict or bar such activity in whole or in part. These rules on trading in shares and related interests are extensive and intricate. Prospective offerors should familiarise themselves, well in advance of approaching a potential offeree, with the distinct yet overlapping regulatory regimes that underpin these constraints. Moreover, transactions in shares and other securities of parties to an offer may trigger disclosure under several separate legal...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
UK Takeover Code Rule 38: Connected Exempt Principal Traders—Prohibitions, Dealings, Assenting and Voting Restrictions, Derogations, Sanctions and Panel Guidance

Rule 38—Setting the scene This Resource Note summarises the key provisions of Rule 38 of The City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (the Code), which governs dealings by connected exempt principal traders. It signposts pertinent materials, commentary and guidance from the Panel on Takeovers and Mergers (the Panel), alongside Lexis+® UK analysis and resources, to offer practical assistance on interpreting and applying Rule 38... Code and Lexis+® UK resources Materials referenced in this Resource Note include: Practice Statements issued by the Panel Executive (the team responsible for day-to-day takeover supervision and regulation) (Executive), giving informal guidance on how the Executive typically interprets and applies the Code Panel Statements (P/S) and Panel Instruments published by the Panel Public Consultation Papers (PCP) and Response Statements (RS) issued by the Code Committee Annual Reports from the Panel discussing broader issues (Annual Reports) Relevant Lexis+® UK resources What it covers Rule 38 concerns dealings carried out by connected exempt principal...

Read More Right Arrow