Proprietor meaning

This Checklist Land title documentation—registered or otherwise—may indicate that the current owner, or a prior proprietor, has agreed covenants affecting all or part of the land. These obligations can be positive (for example, to keep a boundary fence in repair) or restrictive (for example, a promise not to build alongside a boundary). While covenants invariably bind the original contracting parties, the law treats positive and restrictive covenants differently when assessing their impact on successors in title to those parties. This Checklist is intended for use during due diligence where a property is burdened by and/or enjoys the benefit of one or more restrictive covenants. Such covenants may be: imposed for the landowner’s own benefit; they are personal and enforceable only by the original parties unless expressly assigned to a third party part of a scheme, such as a building scheme, where mutual enforceability is intended—see Practice Note: Restrictive covenants—nature and characteristics—Building schemes imposed on one parcel of land with the intention of benefiting or...

Use this Checklist when considering and reviewing a registered title as part of the due diligence process. It presumes the title is being assessed in the context of a proposed purchase of the property; however, identical considerations arise when due diligence is undertaken in relation to taking a registered charge over the property, or when negotiating and entering into a new lease of the property. For land that is unregistered, refer to Practice Notes: Deducing title to unregistered land—compulsory first registration, party to register, evidence of title, good root of title and unbroken chain of ownership; and Deducing title to unregistered land—stamp duty, mortgages, execution of documents, missing title deeds, sales of part and other considerations. Have official copies of the register and plan been provided? Official copies—register and plan For registered land, title is shown by supplying current official copies of the register and plan. They must be obtained from HM Land Registry, either by: sending a paper form using the...

The FTT decision As noted in a previous Insight, the proprietor of Vista Tower ('Grey') applied for an RCO against the building’s original developer and 95 additional parties who met the definition of ‘associated persons’ due to shared directors during 2017 to 2022. The owner requested an order requiring the respondents to cover both historic and forthcoming costs to rectify fire safety defects, estimated at over £20m. The FTT granted that relief, on a joint and several liability basis, against 75 respondents. The appeal Certain respondents appealed on these grounds: whether the Tribunal can make RCOs rendering multiple respondents jointly and severally liable for the same overall sum, or whether it must make individual orders against each respondent for a specifically identified amount. whether the Tribunal misdirected itself on the “just and equitable” test, given that for many respondents there was no demonstration that they participated in the relevant development or obtained remuneration from it, and that the Tribunal improperly required respondents to...

DDR v BDR [2024] EWFC 278 What are the practical implications of this case? As well as offering a highly accessible distillation and application of the principles governing disputes over property between a sole legal proprietor and a non-legal claimant asserting a beneficial interest, this judgment underlines the truly basic distinction between the court’s declaratory function in property matters and its redistributive powers under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973). It also offers a template for the clear, targeted presentation of financial remedy applications. Where questions arise about the scope of a party’s bankruptcy estate, the approach must be equally disciplined. Its structured reasoning demonstrates how to keep such issues sharply defined and tightly analysed throughout the conduct of the application, from start to finish. The judge’s careful, methodical analysis should not mask the 'somewhat unfocused and unproductive' progression of the litigation for a substantial period, a consequence in large measure of both parties acting in person for most of the case. Happily, at a comparatively late juncture,...

Adriatic Land 5 Ltd v Long Leaseholders at Hippersley Point [2025] EWCA Civ 856 What are the practical implications of this case? Relevant service charge sums incurred by a landlord and already collected from leaseholders before the commencement of BSA 2022, Sch 8 remain unaffected. Conversely, where a landlord had not succeeded in recovering those categories of service charge costs from a leaseholder under a qualifying lease before the coming into force of BSA 2022, the landlord is now prevented from doing so by the new regime. In the same vein, any relevant service charges incurred after Sch 8 came into force are not recoverable. The effect is potentially far‑reaching, as other provisions within Sch 8 are phrased so as to apply retrospectively, including those addressing cladding remediation, and are therefore likely to have broader implications across similar claims. What was the background? Adriatic Land 5 Ltd (Adriatic) was entered on 12 April 2017 as the registered freehold proprietor of Hippersley Point. The property was at...

Context The compulsory purchase regime is founded on the premise that a proprietor of land, or of rights, that are compulsorily taken or disturbed is entitled to be compensated. Consequently, working out the compensation is a central part of the compulsory purchase process; see: Promoting a compulsory purchase order, covering preparation of the order, its supporting documents and the making of the order. This Practice Note sets out the core principles for assessing compensation arising from the compulsory acquisition of an interest in land. Compulsory acquisition must rest on specific statutory authority, whether for taking the land itself or rights in or over it. The Royal Prerogative is reserved to the Crown, and even the Crown typically prefers to expropriate or requisition land under statutory powers. Most acquisitions proceed under Public General Acts, for example the Highways Act 1980 (HiA 1980). The making and confirmation of a compulsory purchase order (CPO) is usually regulated by the Acquisition of Land Act 1981 (ALA 1981). See Practice Note: Sources and limits...

This Practice Note looks at how to obtain official copies of the registers and plans maintained by HM Land Registry (HMLR) in respect of individual registered titles relating to freehold and leasehold land in England and Wales. It sets out how to obtain official copies where you have only: the title number or the property’s address the property’s location, or the name of the registered proprietor Property practitioners ought, as a matter of routine, to secure up-to-date official copies of all relevant title documents at the outset of a property transaction. Practitioners in other areas may likewise find it helpful or necessary to obtain official copies when involved in transactions concerning property...

Hackney carriages and private hire vehicles A ‘hackney carriage’ means a vehicle authorised to ‘ply for hire’, namely to offer a taxi service and stand on taxi ranks awaiting passengers. See the Practice Note: Taxi licensing. Plying for hire without a hackney carriage licence is an offence under section 45 of the Town Police Clauses Act 1847 (TPCA 1847). Touting for car hire services constitutes an offence by virtue of section 167 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 (CJPOA 1994). See Practice Notes: Taxi touting or soliciting for hire, and Taxi and private hire vehicles enforcement. A ‘private hire vehicle’ is defined at section 80 of the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976 (LG(MP)A 1976) as ‘a motor vehicle constructed or adapted to seat fewer than nine passengers, other than a hackney carriage or public service vehicle, or a London cab or tramcar, which is provided for hire with the services of a driver for the purpose of carrying passengers’. A ‘private hire vehicle’ must not...

This Agreement is entered into on [ insert date ] Parties [ insert name ], a company incorporated in [ England and Wales ] with number [ insert company number ] and having its registered office at [ insert address ] (Licensor); and [ insert name ], a company incorporated in [ England and Wales ] with number [ insert company number ], whose registered office is at [ insert address ] (Licensee). Each of the Licensor and the Licensee is a party, and together the Licensor and the Licensee are the parties. BACKGROUND (A) The Licensor [ is the [ registered ] proprietor of OR is the applicant to register OR has the right to licence and/or sub-licence ] certain intellectual property rights. (B) The Licensee is [ insert background to licence/relevant transaction ]. (C) The Licensor has agreed to grant a licence of those intellectual property rights to the Licensee, and the Licensee has...

This Agreement is dated [ insert date ] Parties [ insert licensor name ], [ of OR a [ company OR partnership OR limited liability partnership ] [ incorporated OR constituted ] in [ insert jurisdiction, eg England and Wales ], registered number [ insert company or LLP number ], with [ registered office OR principal place of business ] at [ insert address ] (Licensor); and [ insert licensee name ], [ of OR a [ company OR partnership OR limited liability partnership ] [ incorporated OR constituted ] in [ insert jurisdiction, eg England and Wales ], registered number [ insert company or LLP number ], with [ registered office OR principal place of business ] at [ insert address ] (Licensee) Each of the Licensor and the Licensee is a party; together, the Licensor and the Licensee are the parties. Background The Licensor is the proprietor of the Technology IP. The Licensee has agreed...

This DEED bears the date [ insert date ]. Parties [ insert name ] [ of OR a company incorporated in [ England and Wales ] under number [ insert registered number ], whose registered office is at ] [ insert address ] (the Assignor); [ insert name ] [ of OR a company incorporated in [ England and Wales ] under number [ insert registered number ], whose registered office is at ] [ insert address ] (the Assignee). Each of the Assignor and the Assignee is a party and, collectively, the Assignor and the Assignee are the parties. BACKGROUND (A) The Assignor is the [ proprietor of OR applicant for ] the Patents as defined herein. (B) The [ Parties have entered into the Main Agreement as defined herein and the ] Assignor has agreed to assign such Patents to the Assignee, and the Assignee has agreed to accept the assignment in accordance with the terms of...

The continuing enforceability of the right of access After the A Land is first registered, whether a right of access remains enforceable hinges on the date when the title to the A Land was first entered on the register. If that initial registration occurred before 13 October 2003, the Land Registration Act 1925, ss 5 and 9 (LRA 1925), provided that the first proprietor of the A Land took the estate subject to any overriding interests that already affected the A Land...

Joint property ownership in England and Wales When property is owned jointly in England and Wales, it is held in two ways. The legal title shows the names under which the property is registered. Those legal owners hold it on trust for the beneficial owners (also called equitable owners). Beneficial owners are often the same as the legal owners, but need not be. Legal title is always held as joint tenants. Accordingly, the registered owners hold the property ‘per muy et per tout’: each owns the entirety rather than fixed shares...

In responding to this Q&A, the following assumptions are made: the land is not a residential property the land is registered the period of possession occurred after October 2013 and the 'new rules' apply to it Definitions used for clarity: the owner is 'the registered proprietor' the third party is 'the squatter' For a squatter to pursue an adverse possession claim against the registered proprietor, the squatter must demonstrate, for the requisite period of ten years, that both of the following are satisfied: the claimant enjoyed uninterrupted factual possession of the land for that period ('factual possession'); and the claimant intended to possess the land throughout that period ('intention to possess') These elements must be established across the whole of that period. Factual Possession To establish factual possession, the squatter must have exercised a sufficient degree of exclusive physical control over the land. What amounts to...