“The forms and precedents section is essential so that I can quickly and easily look up provisions to include in templates or bespoke project contracts.”
RWEAccess all documents on Public to unlimited
This checklist offers a brief overview of the actions to take and the paperwork to prepare for a public limited company to convert to a private unlimited company under Part 7 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006)... Preliminary considerations Ensure the company fully understands the consequences of becoming unlimited. Members and directors should note that: an unlimited company is not obliged to file accounts at Companies House (CA 2006, s 448); capital maintenance rules do not restrict an unlimited company (CA 2006, s 690); and members’ liability has no ceiling, so they must be prepared to support the company financially. Re-registration of a public company as private and unlimited Confirm whether the company has previously been re-registered as limited or unlimited; if it has, re-registration as unlimited is not permitted (CA 2006, s 109(2)). Be satisfied that unanimous assent of the members can be secured for...
In Downtul Ltd [In Liquidation] v Companies Act [2025] IEHC 358, the Irish High Court imposed restrictions for a period of five years on two directors, after determining that they did not act prudently or have proper regard to the interests of Downtul Limited (the Company) as a distinct entity within a complex corporate arrangement. The decision underlines the intricate nature of directors’ obligations in group scenarios and the need to prioritise the interests of each separate company. As a result of the restriction order, the two individuals—each currently sitting on the boards of more than 100 Irish companies—are barred from acting as company directors for five years unless the relevant company has a nominal share capital of at least €100,000 (or €500,000 where the entity is a public limited company or an unlimited company). Background The individuals were directors of the Company, which leased a commercial premises later occupied and run as a Starbucks café by another company, Atercin. They also served as directors of Atercin...
Mergers The CMA imposed an IEO regarding Topps Tiles Plc’s completed acquisition of certain assets from Tildist Realisations Limited (formerly CTD Tiles Limited)—see case page. NOTE—For all current CMA merger cases, see UK mergers—ongoing cases tracker. Subsidy control The Subsidy Advice Unit accepted a referral from the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero on proposed Industrial Carbon Capture and Waste ICC business model schemes—see case page. The Subsidy Advice Unit accepted a referral from the same department on a proposed subsidy for Cromarty Firth Port Authority—see case page. NOTE—For all referrals under the Subsidy Control Act 2022, see UK subsidy control—cases tracker. Private actions On 2 October 2024, the CAT issued an order in The Scottish Ministers and The Scottish Health Boards v Accord‑UK Limited (formerly Actavis UK Limited) & Others, a damages claim against Allergan Unlimited Company stemming from the CMA’s July 2021 infringement decision on 10mg and 20mg immediate‑release...
The Father (Appellant) v Worcestershire County Council (Respondent) [2025] UKSC 1 What are the practical implications of this case? Acting without legal representation, the father pursued his case to the Supreme Court, which entertained his submissions and examined the legal position that would have applied had the children been confined rather than living in foster care. The Court heard him in full and addressed the framework relevant to situations where children would, in fact, have been deprived of liberty rather than cared for by foster families. Its status as guidance will assist judges dealing with analogous cases in practice. The decision offers guidance for family courts facing comparable applications and, by extension, informs deprivation of liberty matters. On whether care orders issued by the High Court or the Family Court are susceptible to judicial review, the Supreme Court observed that an order of the High Court is not amenable to judicial review because that court has unlimited jurisdiction; the correct avenue is appeal or a bid for reconsideration (para...
This Practice Note looks at the principal considerations and steps when establishing a company limited by shares or by guarantee. What is a company? A company is a business vehicle that exists as a separate legal entity, distinct from its members. It is owned by its members and run by its directors. It is governed by the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). Companies are widely used; more than 5 million are on the UK public register maintained by Companies House. Under the CA 2006, the following company types are available: Public or private companies limited by shares — see Practice Notes: Private companies limited by shares and Public companies limited by shares Private companies limited by guarantee (primarily used by charities and other not-for-profit organisations — see Practice Note: Companies limited by guarantee) Unlimited companies (comparatively uncommon — see Practice Note: Unlimited companies) For details on other business vehicles, see Practice Note: Forms of business vehicle — fundamentals....
This Practice Note outlines the key features of a private company limited by shares. It also explains the principal differences from public companies limited by shares, and why this structure might be selected as the preferred business vehicle rather than another UK company form. What is a private company limited by shares? A private company limited by shares is a distinct legal person, separate from its members. Ownership rests with members through their shareholdings, while directors run the company in accordance with the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) and the company’s constitutional document, the articles of association. This is a widely adopted vehicle. The Companies House public register records over five million limited companies, of which more than 95% are private companies limited by shares. The other UK company types available under the CA 2006 are: public companies limited by shares—see Practice Note: Public companies limited by shares private companies limited by guarantee, which are primarily used by charities and other not-for-profit...
This Practice Note forms part of a multi-jurisdictional guide covering key aspects of establishing particular business vehicles across global jurisdictions. Member firms within the Multilaw global law firm network address core questions on this subject. This chapter highlights principal considerations for setting up a company limited by shares in Taiwan. Current as at 7 March 2023. Prepared by Benjamin Li, Lee and Li, Attorneys-at-Law, a Multilaw member firm. Common entities 1. Which entity is covered by this questionnaire? Which other commonly used vehicles in this jurisdiction are addressed in separate responses? This response concentrates on the company limited by shares. 2. Other entity types that exist locally but are not covered here include: General partnership Limited partnership Unlimited company Limited company Unlimited company with limited liability shareholders Close-held company limited by shares General principles 3. Principal source of law for this entity: the Company Act. 4. Brief overview of the entity • Does it...
Company number: [ insert number ] Minutes of a meeting of the board of directors (the Meeting) of [ insert full name of company ] (the Company) Held at [ insert place of meeting ] on [ insert day, month and year of meeting ] at [ insert time of meeting ] [ am OR pm ]. Present [ Insert names of the director(s) physically present ] [ Insert names of any directors present by telephone as permitted by the Company’s articles of association ] (by telephone) [ Insert names of any directors present by other means permitted by the Company’s articles of association ] (by [ insert other means ]) In attendance [ Insert names of anyone in attendance, who does not count towards the quorum for the Meeting (eg the company secretary, any legal advisers) (if any) ] Apologies [ Insert names of any directors who are unable...