Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“What I spend on my yearly subscription, equals to a day's billable hours for me not to mention time efficiency and peace of mind.”

Jai Stern

Access all documents on Purpose

Purpose meaning

What does Purpose mean?
In practice, Purpose describes the permitted activities and use of information in connection with a proposed or agreed standstill or restructuring. It is a contractual defined term, not set by legislation or case law, and its use is broadly consistent across England and Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland. Purpose means the evaluation, negotiation, documentation, monitoring and implementation of a standstill agreement or a restructuring agreement, together with ancillary steps reasonably necessary for that outcome. This typically includes due diligence; formulating and assessing proposals; seeking, granting and recording waivers or consents; preparing, amending and executing finance, intercreditor and security documents; coordinating with agents, security trustees and professional advisers; communicating with affected stakeholders; and taking actions required to implement the agreed standstill or restructuring and to monitor compliance and milestones. The defined Purpose is commonly used to confine disclosure and use of confidential information (including under NDAs), to authorise limited information-sharing among creditors and the company, and to delineate permitted conduct during any forbearance period. Where relevant, it extends to associated court processes (for example, a scheme of arrangement or restructuring plan in the UK, or examinership in Ireland).
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Checklists about Purpose

CHECKLISTS
Pre‑drafting checklist for private trusts: parties, assets, powers, administration and tax (England and Wales)

1. Settlor Gather the following details about the settlor (or each settlor, where there is more than one): full name and courtesy title status date of birth address domicile nationality usual residence a schedule of assets and liabilities (for this purpose, a separate schedule is useful) 2. Name of the trust Confirm with the settlor what the trust should be named 3. ...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
UK occupational pension trustee appointment, removal and retirement: practitioner checklist

When appointing and removing pension trustees: Make sure the authority to appoint or dismiss trustees is always exercised solely for a legitimate and proper purpose. Carefully review the trust deed and rules, confirming that every appointment, removal or retirement of a trustee is carried out strictly in line with those documents. Where a company serves as sole trustee, refer to the company’s articles and ensure directors are appointed, removed or retire strictly in accordance with those provisions. Identify whether any restrictions apply to the appointment or removal of trustees—for example, a minimum or maximum number—and make certain the proposed action does not contravene any such restrictions...

Read More Right Arrow
CHECKLISTS
Archived UCITS timeline: EU and UK legislative and regulatory milestones 2009–2026 (PRIIPs KIDs/KIIDs, AIFMD II, cross-border distribution, sustainability, DORA, ESAP, FCA/HMT updates)

ARCHIVED: This Practice Note is archived and is no longer maintained. UCITS is the acronym for undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities. The expression derives from Directive (EC) 85/611 concerning the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (the Original UCITS Directive), which was adopted in 1985. The purpose of the Original UCITS Directive was to establish a single market for open-ended retail investment funds that offered enhanced protection for investors. The UCITS framework has been updated on several occasions, with the Management Company Directive 2001/107/EU adopted in 2002 and the Product Directive 2001/108/EU implemented in 2005 (together referred to as UCITS III); followed by implementation in 2011 of Directive 2009/65/EC (the UCITS Directive, also called UCITS IV), which repealed and replaced the Original UCITS Directive; and Directive 2014/91/EU (UCITS V), which was transposed into national law on 18 March 2016...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Flowcharts about Purpose

FLOWCHARTS
Final Payment Procedure and Notices under the JCT Intermediate Building Contract 2016 (with and without Contractor’s Design) – Flowchart

This flowchart for investigating financial sanctions target matches clearly sets out the sequential actions to follow once a suspected financial sanctions target (designated person) match is found. Its purpose is to confirm that every pertinent point is addressed consistently and thoroughly throughout. Note 1 See Precedent: Financial sanctions match report form. The form is for staff to submit and record potential financial sanctions target (designated person) matches identified via the screening process...

Read More Right Arrow
FLOWCHARTS
Flowchart: firm registration for UK consumer buy-to-let (CBTL) mortgage regulated activities under the Mortgage Credit Directive Order 2015

Purpose of the CBTL flowchart The aim of this flowchart is to support firms in deciding whether they are required to register to carry on regulated activities in connection with consumer buy-to-let (CBTL) mortgages under the Mortgage Credit Directive Order 2015, SI 2015/910 (MCD Order 2015). That Order transposed the EU Mortgage Credit Directive (Directive 2014/17/EU) (the EU MCD) into the UK regulatory framework ahead of the UK’s decision to leave the EU. It should also be read alongside Practice Note: Regulation of consumer buy-to-let lending in the UK. The CBTL flowchart...

Read More Right Arrow
FLOWCHARTS
Personal injury referral fees under LASPO 2012: SRA guidance, permitted/prohibited arrangements, examples and flowchart (England and Wales)

This Practice Note distils the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s guidance and examples on what might constitute acceptable or prohibited referral arrangements in personal injury matters. Although published under the 2011 SRA regime, that guidance appears to apply equally under the SRA 2019 regime. What is prohibited? To breach the personal injury (PI) referral fee ban, the following elements must all arise: you receive a referral it concerns a PI or ancillary claim you pay a banned referral fee, meaning payment for the referral itself, not as remuneration for supplying services or for some other purpose For further guidance, see Practice Notes: Personal injury referral fee—the statutory regime; and Personal injury referral arrangements—SRA requirements—What does the SRA prohibit?...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related News about Purpose

NEWS
EU competition law daily briefing: statement of objections to Meta over WhatsApp AI assistant access ban; possible interim measures; updated reform timeline; merger clearances; State aid decisions; key upcoming dates

Antitrust Commission issues SO to Meta over WhatsApp AI access limits; flags possible interim measures The Commission has delivered a statement of objections to Meta, outlining its preliminary assessment that Meta blocked third-party artificial intelligence (AI) assistants from accessing and engaging with users on WhatsApp, infringing Article 102 TFEU (AT.41034). The Commission considers that Meta’s behaviour risks preventing competitors from entering or growing in the rapidly expanding market for general-purpose AI assistants and has therefore indicated its intention to impose interim measures (subject to Meta’s rights of defence) to avoid serious and irreparable harm to competition. Background On 15 October 2025, Meta announced changes to its WhatsApp Business Solution Terms, effectively prohibiting third-party general-purpose AI assistants from the platform. Consequently, from 15 January 2026, Meta’s own assistant, Meta AI, has been the only AI assistant available on WhatsApp. On 4 December 2025, the Commission opened formal proceedings to examine whether this policy shift amounts to an abuse of dominance. The investigation covers the EEA, excluding Italy, where...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK and EU energy law: Ofgem RFPR changes, Finch Scope 3 ruling, fusion NPS consultation, EU market reform and Net Zero Industry Act, and EU withdrawal from Energy Charter Treaty

In this issue Electricity and gas market regulation and licensing Renewable energy Nuclear energy Air emissions, efficiency, and climate change International energy LexTalk®Energy: a Lexis®Nexis community Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Dates for your diary Trackers Electricity and gas market regulation and licensing Ofgem has confirmed changes to the Regulatory Financial Performance Reporting (RFPR) template and guidance for RIIO‑2, intended to sharpen and clarify what network licensees must report. The revisions apply from 28 June 2024 and follow Ofgem’s earlier notice proposing amendments to the RFPR template and guidance for RIIO‑2. See: LNB News 01/07/2024 9. Electricity Code Modifications: National Grid ESO’s Modification Tracker now brings together all live changes to the Connection and Use of System Code (CUSC), the Grid Code (GD), the System Owner -Transmission Owner Code (STC) and the Security and Quality Supply Standard (SQSS). The tracker outlines each proposal’s purpose, the stakeholders impacted, Panel views...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
UK Data (Use and Access) Act 2025: Implications for Pension Schemes—DSARs, Complaints, ICO Powers, ADM, Recognised Legitimate Interests, Marketing, Special Category Data, Purpose Limitation and Practical Steps

What are the most significant changes introduced by the Act that pension scheme trustees need to prepare for? The most notable reforms in the Act that trustees should be ready for are: Data subject complaints: complaints about the handling of personal data must be acknowledged within 30 days and answered without undue delay. ICO enforcement powers: the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) now has authority to compel interviews and require the production of documents to assess compliance. Data subject access requests (DSARs): the Act codifies the ICO’s existing guidance, meaning (i) trustees must apply a ‘reasonable and proportionate’ search standard when responding; and (ii) the ‘stop the clock’ rule pauses the one-month deadline for a response. Automated decision making (ADM): the Act allows reliance on the full set of lawful bases — including ‘legitimate interests’ — when non-special category personal data is used for significant automated decisions about an individual, provided suitable safeguards are in place. ...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about Purpose

PRACTICE NOTES
UK DTR 2: issuer obligations on disclosure, delay, control and selective disclosure of inside information—FCA/ESMA guidance, case law, COVID‑19 context and enforcement (post‑Brexit UK MAR)

Resource Note This Resource Note signposts key commentary, analysis and materials to aid interpretation and offer practical direction on using Chapter 2 of the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules (DTR 2). Where relevant, it draws on: the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) Handbook FCA Knowledge Base—Procedural and Technical notes (formal guidance binding on the FCA) FCA consultation and discussion papers, policy and feedback statements, and warnings Primary Market Bulletins and other FCA publications legacy UKLA technical and procedural notes and the UKLA’s newsletter List!, where still pertinent assimilated EU legislation EU Directives and EU Regulations, where helpful to construing a provision Lexis+® UK analysis and resources Setting the scene What it covers: DTR 2 prescribes the framework for issuers to disclose and manage inside information, supporting timely and even-handed release of market-sensitive information. It also identifies specific situations permitting a delay to public disclosure of inside information, together with the safeguards required to keep such information...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
UK FCA DTR 1–1C: application, post‑Brexit and 2024 listing reforms, MAR interplay, audit committees, misleading disclosures and related party rules

This Resource Note spotlights commentary, analysis and materials to aid interpretation and give practical guidance on applying Chapters 1, 1A, 1B and 1C of the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules: DTR 1, DTR 1A, DTR 1B and DTR 1C respectively. Materials referenced here include, where pertinent: the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) Handbook FCA Knowledge Base guidance—Procedural notes and Technical notes (constituting formal guidance and binding on the FCA) FCA consultation papers, discussion papers, policy statements, feedback statements and warnings Primary Market Bulletins and other FCA publications former UKLA technical and procedural notes and the UKLA newsletter List!, where still relevant to interpreting or applying a provision assimilated EU legislation EU Directives and EU Regulations, where relevant to interpreting a provision Lexis+ UK analysis and resources Setting the scene What it covers: DTR 1 sets out the Disclosure guidance, explaining its scope and purpose; DTR 1A sets out the transparency rules with their scope and purpose;...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
The Pensions Regulator's moral hazard powers: contribution notices and financial support directions: tests, procedure, reasonableness, guidance, case law, clearance and Pension Schemes Act 2021 criminal offences

The Pensions Regulator (the Regulator) The Regulator is an arm’s-length public body set up under the Pensions Act 2004 (PeA 2004). Its authority to impose contribution notices and financial support directions appears in PeA 2004, ss 38–50. Although the Act does not use the label, these provisions are widely known as the Regulator’s ‘moral hazard’ powers. Their purpose is to counter the ‘moral hazard’ arising from the Pension Protection Fund (PPF): the possibility that corporate groups might organise their structures so as to heighten exposure within their pension schemes, comfortable that the PPF would intervene if the employer entered insolvency. The principal moral hazard tools—and the only ones exercised so far—are the power to issue a contribution notice (CN) and the power to issue a financial support direction (FSD). A CN compels the recipient to pay a specified amount into a defined benefit occupational pension scheme. A CN can be issued where the criteria in PeA 2004, s 38 are satisfied. These mechanisms exist to deter behaviour that would...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about Purpose

PRECEDENTS
Chair’s script and voting procedure for creditors’ and members’ meetings approving a Part 26A Companies Act 2006 restructuring plan (England and Wales)

1 Introduction At [ insert the exact time ], I declare open the meeting of Creditors/Members of [ insert name of the company ] [ with [ insert type of claim ] claims, and the meeting of Creditors/Members of [ insert name of the company ] with [ insert type of claim ] Claims ]. I am [ insert name ], of [ insert firm or company name ], acting as [ insert details of who the chairperson is eg adviser etc ]. The Meeting [ s ] taking place today [ has OR have ] been convened by the Company pursuant to an Order of the High Court of Justice of England & Wales made on [ insert date ]. The purpose of the Meeting [ s ] is to review and, if considered appropriate, approve the Restructuring Plan(s) under Part 26A of the Companies Act 2006 that the Company proposes to enter into with [ certain of ] its creditors/members. Pursuant to the...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Precedent: UK seconded employee privacy notice—employer and host data sharing, lawful bases (including special category data), rights, retention, security and international transfers

Stop press: The Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 (Commencement No 6 and Transitional and Saving Provisions) Regulations 2026, SI 2026/82 now commence the remaining provisions of the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 (DUAA 2025). Provisions covering the areas below apply from 5 February 2026, while those on penalty notices and complaints apply from 19 June 2026. For further details, see Practice Note: Data (Use and Access) Act 2025—employment implications. This Precedent will be updated shortly to reflect these changes. subject access requests legitimate interests purpose limitation automated decision-making international transfers enforcement [ Insert name of organisation ] Data protection privacy notice (secondment) As you are aware, it is proposed that you will be seconded to [ insert name ] (host employer). This notice sets out which personal data (information) [ insert name of employer ] [ trading as [ insert trading name, if different ] ] (‘we’ or ‘Company’) will provide to, and receive from, your...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Preserving Legal Professional Privilege in Organisations: Practical Guide to Legal Advice and Litigation Privilege, Defining the Client, Labelling, Meetings, Document Management and Regulator Interactions

Legal professional privilege (LPP) is a core legal protection that permits [ insert organisation’s name ] to resist producing evidence to a third party or the court. It enables the organisation to seek expert legal guidance, setting out all pertinent facts to our legal advisers without concern that they will later be revealed and used against us. This short guide sets out what legal professional privilege (LPP) is and how we can best preserve it. 1 What is legal professional privilege? LPP is an umbrella term covering: legal advice privilege (LAP) litigation privilege LPP safeguards the confidentiality of written and verbal communications between lawyers and clients. It is a fundamental entitlement, allowing a party to withhold material from disclosure to any third party or a court. Legal advice privilege Legal advice privilege applies to all confidential communications between a client and their lawyer made for the purpose of giving or obtaining legal advice...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Q&As about Purpose

Q&As
UK GDPR: Legitimate interests or consent for using employees’ birth dates (day/month) for birthday greetings?

In any specific context, a controller handling personal data or information must assess if the processing activity complies with what is now the applicable Assimilated Regulation (EU) 2016/679, the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR), and the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA 2018)...

Read More Right Arrow
Q&As
Insolvency set-off in administration: creditor B's steps

In this Q&A, we assume that B’s claim is smaller than A’s. Legal process against the company Under paragraph 43(2) of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986), the moratorium prevents any legal process—covering legal proceedings, execution, distress and diligence—from being started or continued against the company or its property without the administrator’s consent or the court’s permission. This wording is wide enough to encompass any remaining actions or steps that might otherwise be taken against the company or its property. Accordingly, B can only bring an action against A with the approval of the administrator or the leave of the court. The purpose of the moratorium (and the interim moratorium) is to safeguard the company and its assets from creditor action during the company’s administration and the pre-appointment period. It bars any steps, actions or processes from being begun or carried on against the company and its property, save with the administrator’s consent (if one is appointed) or the court’s permission. See Practice...

Read More Right Arrow
Q&As
AST to a company assigned for vet use: status & LTA 1954 Part II

Section 1(1)(a) of the Housing Act 1988 (HA 1988) Under this provision in the Act, only an individual can be the tenant of an assured tenancy. Consequently, a company letting cannot qualify as an assured shorthold tenancy (AST). The HA 1988 also specifies categories of tenancy that are excluded from being ASTs, including business tenancies under the Act. As a result, the arrangement will then fall either as a common law tenancy—outside the HA 1988 and subject to ordinary contractual principles—or, where the relevant requirements are satisfied, as a business tenancy...

Read More Right Arrow