Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“In some areas of research there were also significant time savings. You get to what you are looking for more quickly, which all goes to the value of the product.”

Harper Mcleod

Access all documents on Put up or shut up (PUSU)

Put up or shut up (PUSU) meaning

What does Put up or shut up (PUSU) mean?
In public takeovers, a “put up or shut up” (PUSU) deadline compels a named potential bidder to state its intentions promptly. Under Rule 2.6(a) of the UK Takeover Code, when a potential offeror is first identified in a possible offer announcement (including a leak response), it must, by 5.00 pm on the 28th day after that announcement, either: (i) announce a firm intention to make an offer under Rule 2.7; or (ii) announce that it does not intend to make an offer (a Rule 2.8 statement). The Takeover Panel may extend, shorten, impose or suspend a PUSU deadline (including in competitive situations), typically with the offeree board’s consent, for example to allow due diligence or regulatory clearances. A Rule 2.8 “no intention” statement normally bars the bidder and its concert parties from announcing or making an offer for six months, subject to customary reservations (such as with the target board’s agreement or if a third party announces a firm intention to make an offer). Ireland operates a broadly equivalent PUSU regime under the Irish Takeover Rules, with substantially similar timetables and Panel discretion. Usage and effect are consistent across England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland. Practical significance: accelerates bid certainty,...
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Practice Notes about Put up or shut up (PUSU)

PRACTICE NOTES
UK Takeover Code Amendments (September 2011): 28-day PUSU, ban on break fees/offer-related arrangements, enhanced financing and fee disclosure, employee opinion rights, scheme timetables, curbs on virtual bids

Practice Note This Practice Note outlines the significant revisions made to the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (Code) in September 2011. The reforms chiefly sought to curb perceived tactical benefits enjoyed by certain hostile (unrecommended) bidders and to refine the conduct of offers by giving fuller regard to those affected by a takeover beyond offeree shareholders, including employees and other affected parties. This Practice Note concentrates on the principal September 2011 modifications to the Code, preserving the same focus and scope. It does not address or analyse any later changes to the Code or subsequent updates. Material amendments took effect on Monday, 19 September 2011 (Implementation Date). Putting these measures into effect, through the release of a new version of the Code (the tenth edition), followed an extensive consultation exercise initiated by The Panel on Takeovers and Mergers (Panel) in response to concerns about how the Code had been operating at the time. Those concerns were brought into the public eye by the manner in which several prominent...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Announcements under the UK Takeover Code: Rule 2 secrecy, possible and firm offers, PUSU, identification, strategic reviews, formal sale processes, and offer-period disclosures

The City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (Code) is the main framework setting rules for: the schedule, manner and exact substance of announcements made before and during a takeover bid the disclosure of shareholdings and dealings throughout an offer period (see Practice Note: Disclosure of interests and dealings in shares prior to and during a takeover) Practice Statement 20: Rule 2—Secrecy, possible offer announcements and pre-announcement responsibilities explains how the Takeover Panel (Panel) typically both interprets and applies the provisions of Rule 2 of the Code regarding the need for secrecy beforehand, in practice, and the timing, content and scope of possible offer announcements, including the actions the Panel expects the parties involved in a potential offer and their advisers to take so as to help ensure they fully meet their responsibilities under Rule 2...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
City Code timetable for UK contractual takeover offers: PUSU, Day 0–60 milestones, revisions, acceleration statements, regulatory suspensions, competing bids, extensions, Rule 15, long‑stop and squeeze‑out

This Practice Note outlines the timetable for takeovers carried out as contractual offers. It addresses the 28-day ‘put up or shut up’ requirement under Rule 2.6, the Day 0 posting of the offer document, and the key milestones on Day 21, Day 39, Day 53 and Day 60 under the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (Code), alongside offer revisions and the effect of competing bids on timing. For illustrative schedules, see Timetable—recommended offer and Timetable—hostile offer. For a comparative schedule contrasting takeovers via offer and via scheme of arrangement, see Structuring a takeover: offers and schemes of arrangement—comparative timetables. Legal and regulatory framework Following an offeror’s announcement of a firm intention to make an offer (Firm Intention Announcement), the timetable is governed by: the Code, subject to the Panel consenting to or directing modifications to the Code’s application (eg in competitive scenarios and/or to accommodate the decision-making of UK or overseas competition authorities) company law applicable stock exchange rules ...

Read More Right Arrow