A proposed type of nuptial agreement intended to be contractually binding on financial remedies on divorce or civil partnership dissolution, while preserving the court’s power to meet the parties’ and children’s needs. Coined in the Law Commission’s 2014 report (Law Com No 343), it envisaged legislation to create “qualifying nuptial agreements” subject to safeguards on voluntariness, disclosure and independent legal advice.
No implementing legislation has been passed in England and Wales; pre‑ and post‑nuptial agreements remain influential but not automatically binding (Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42).
In Scotland, the label is not used; nuptial agreements (eg minutes of agreement) are generally binding contracts, capable of being set aside if not fair and reasonable when executed (Family Law (Scotland) Act 1985 and case law). Northern Ireland has no statutory QNAs and broadly follows Radmacher principles. In Ireland, there is no statutory QNA regime; pre‑nuptial agreements are not binding and the court retains full discretion under the Family Law (Divorce) Act 1996, though such agreements may carry weight.
In practice, “QNA” is a policy term used to distinguish the Law Commission’s proposed model from ordinary pre‑ and post‑nuptial agreements.