“LexisLibrary gives us the most relevant and recent cases and always has the latest information on them. It makes research so much easier. We're more cost-effective for our clients and more efficient each day”
AdvocatesAccess all documents on Qualifying subsidiary
This piece considers these questions by exploring the scope—and the inherent ambiguity—of the new offence... The new offence Section 199 of the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA 2023) states that a large organisation commits the failure to prevent fraud offence if it does not stop an associated person from committing a fraud offence, where that associated person intends to benefit, directly or indirectly, either: the organisation the person to whom, or to whose subsidiary, the associated person provides services on the organisation’s behalf Qualifying fraud offences are set out in ECCTA 2023, Schedule 13. An organisation is not guilty of the failure to prevent fraud offence if it is, or is intended to be, the victim of the fraud itself. There is a defence where, at the time the fraud offence occurred, the organisation had reasonable fraud prevention procedures in place. Although the failure to prevent fraud offence is tightly framed as to who may commit it—namely, only...
In this issue: Local government reorganisation Education Children's social care Adult social care Social housing Planning Judicial review Public procurement Local government finance Licensing Pensions Daily and weekly news alerts New and updated content Local government reorganisation IPPR report recommends democratic reforms for English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill IPPR North released analysis exploring the democratic effects of the government’s push to create unitary councils under the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill. The study reviews plans to scrap the remaining two-tier county and district councils—covering roughly 29% of England—and replace them with larger unitary bodies. Ministers contend that unitarisation will streamline administration, raise efficiency and support mayoral devolution, yet it flags democratic downsides: fewer councillors, less frequent elections, and a wider gap between communities and decision-makers. Evidence is cited that bigger councils can erode trust, suppress participation and blunt citizens’ sense of political efficacy, but it also argues that...
The company establishing a SIP The company setting up a share incentive plan (SIP) does not need to be the same entity whose shares are allocated. However, both: the shares to be granted, and the connection between the SIP-establishing entity and the company whose shares are issued must satisfy the relevant legislative conditions. A SIP can be created either: solely for employees of the company that establishes it; or for those employees and for employees of other companies it controls (a group plan)—see Constituent companies below. In a group where the parent company’s shares are to be awarded, there are two options: the parent company may establish the SIP and extend it to the appropriate subsidiaries; or each subsidiary may establish its own SIP, provided the other statutory requirements concerning the shares under award are met—see Requirements for the shares. The advantage of each subsidiary operating its...
The Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) provides comprehensive rules governing how a company prepares its annual accounts. Through the Limited Liability Partnerships (Accounts and Audit) (Application of Companies Act 2006) Regulations 2008, SI 2008/1911 (the 2008 Regulations), selected elements are extended to limited liability partnerships (LLPs), with suitable adaptations. The Limited Liability Partnerships, Partnerships and Groups (Accounts and Audit) Regulations 2016, SI 2016/575 (the 2016 Regulations) introduced a range of amendments to the accounting framework for LLPs and qualifying partnerships. Further alterations affecting LLPs and other bodies were made by the Statutory Auditors Regulations 2017, SI 2017/1164. In most cases, the changes take effect for LLPs with financial years commencing on or after 17 June 2016; however, the stricter conditions on the small LLPs’ exemption from preparing group accounts apply to periods starting on or after 1 January 2017. This Practice Note, read alongside Practice Note: LLP Accounts—an outline of the statutory framework, distils the key obligations contained within these statutory provisions...
Where a company produces annual accounts for a financial year, an audit is required unless an audit exemption applies. Qualifying subsidiary exemption from the requirement to audit accounts A subsidiary that meets specific criteria may claim an exemption from auditing its individual accounts for a given financial year. The necessary conditions are: it is a subsidiary undertaking its parent undertaking is constituted under the law of any part of the United Kingdom every member consents to the exemption for the financial year concerned its parent undertaking provides a guarantee for that financial year under section 479C of the Companies Act 2006, namely a statement guaranteeing all of the subsidiary’s outstanding liabilities at the end of the financial year until they are settled in full, which is enforceable against the parent by any person to whom the subsidiary is liable in respect of those liabilities it is included in the consolidated accounts prepared by the parent for that financial year, or to...
1 Please provide full details of the Company’s compliance with the CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme (the initial phase: 1 April 2014 – 31 March 2019) (CRC Scheme), including: 1.1 Confirm if the Company is participating in the CRC Scheme and state the qualifying basis. Indicate whether it operates as a standalone company, forms part of a group (within the meaning of Art 3 of the CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme Order 2013, as amended, SI 2013/1119), or is treated as a disaggregated subsidiary...