Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
CASE STUDY

“In some areas of research there were also significant time savings. You get to what you are looking for more quickly, which all goes to the value of the product.”

Harper Mcleod

Access all documents on RAG

RAG meaning

Published by a LexisNexis Energy expert
What does RAG mean?
RAG (red/amber/green) is a traffic‑light shorthand used by legal and compliance teams to classify and report risk, progress or compliance in risk assessments and related governance documents. A RAG rating/status typically means: Red — high or intolerable risk, non‑compliance or serious delay requiring immediate escalation; Amber — medium risk or partial compliance requiring mitigation and management attention; Green — low risk, compliant or on track. RAG is not defined in legislation or case law; it is a descriptive expression. Thresholds are set by the organisation or relevant guidance and should be documented and applied consistently, often by reference to likelihood and impact, control effectiveness, and contractual KPIs/SLAs. The approach is widely used across England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland in due diligence, AML/CTF and sanctions assessments, data protection DPIAs/LIAs, health and safety, procurement and supplier risk, project reporting, regulatory remediation, board papers and risk registers. Usage is broadly consistent, though some regulators or public bodies prescribe scoring criteria or require evidence supporting each rating. In practice, RAG helps prioritise actions, support defensible decision‑making and communicate status. Records should show how ratings were determined, planned mitigations and any escalation.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related News about RAG

NEWS
FCA consultation on VFM for workplace DC default arrangements: standardised metrics, RAG ratings, comparator tests and consolidation implications (UK)

What is the background to the FCA’s consultation? Automatic enrolment (AE) launched in 2012 channelled more default saving into DC pensions. Default design in these schemes is sticky; members must overcome behavioural biases to make active choices. Evidence, including a recent Pensions Regulator blog, indicates most AE savers remain in entry‑level defaults such as the default investment strategy. Although steps since AE—such as the Occupational Pension Schemes (Charges and Governance) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015/879)—have been made, a narrow emphasis on charges has not invariably delivered better outcomes. Since 31 December 2021, trust‑based schemes under £100m in assets have faced enhanced value assessments under the Occupational Pension Schemes (Administration, Investment, Charges and Governance (Amendment) Regulations 2021 (SI 2021/1070), yet this has done little to spur DC consolidation or strengthen value measures. Differences between schemes mean some members enjoy stronger DC retirement outcomes than others. The absence of consistent, comparable data and metrics hampers like‑for‑like assessment, and the new VFM framework under consultation aims to increase visibility of scheme quality and...

Read More Right Arrow
NEWS
Investment Association challenges FCA value-for-money RAG comparisons and new-business ban for DC schemes; urges objective-based assessment and alignment with Consumer Duty and assessment of value regimes

The IA, in a letter to the FCA published on 18 October 2024, warned that the regulator’s plan to score pension providers with a traffic‑light style label risks stifling market innovation. It argued that schemes ought to be judged chiefly on delivery against their own strategic objectives, rather than set against other plans pursuing different aims. The letter expresses strong misgivings about the comparative elements of the package, noting that the potential downsides of receiving a red or amber mark, when measured against peers, would remove any clear motivation for providers to innovate within their investment offerings. The FCA’s consultation on a proposed value‑for‑money framework for defined contribution schemes closed on 17 October 2024. Under the proposals, pension providers would be assigned red, amber or green ratings—the ‘RAG’ approach—mirroring the colour coding used for food product grading. The IA said it was extremely concerned about comparative ratings stifling provider innovation and incentives...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Practice Notes about RAG

PRACTICE NOTES
Legal Project Management: A Practical Five-Stage Framework with Stakeholder Mapping, Resourcing and Budgeting, Timeline Control, RAG Tracking and Lessons Learned, Illustrated by a Product Launch

In this Practice Note, we will navigate the five principal stages of legal project management (LPM) through an illustration drawn from an in-house legal team at a multinational drinks manufacturer. It may initially feel long‑winded; however, the virtue of LPM is that once the process is set and the tools are in place, everyone can follow the same process and rely on the same tools, scaling up or down to suit projects of varying size. Stage 1: Defining the scope This stage is the point at which you should devote time to gaining a complete understanding of the project’s scope and to mapping all relevant stakeholders. You can find further guidance on this in Practice Note: Project management: Project lifecycle and set‑up. Example: Suppose the marketing team come to you wishing to launch a limited‑edition flavour and have teamed up with a celebrity for promotion. Legal scope might include, for example, reviewing endorsement agreements, advising on competition law and/or advertising rules, and ensuring brand protection, etc. The...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Creating and managing risk registers for legal teams: identification, categorisation, 5x5 scoring and calibration, RAG ratings, key fields, controls, and monitoring

Managing risk is never a single task; it is a continual process, as illustrated: This Practice Note sets out how to assess and clearly record risks in practice using a risk register, a tool that gathers all of your risk information in one place by carefully classifying each risk the organisation faces, scoring each entry and then choosing your response to each identified risk accordingly, eg reject or accept and, if the latter, how to control or mitigate the risk—see Precedent: Risk register. What is risk? There is a widely recognised definition of risk, ie: Risk = probability x impact. So, for any given risk faced by your business, two questions arise: how likely is it that the risk will occur, ie what is the probability? if it does occur, how serious will it be, ie what is the impact? A risk register is a means of scoring and documenting individual risks using this formula—see section Scoring each risk. It is...

Read More Right Arrow
PRACTICE NOTES
Legal risk registers for in-house lawyers: a practical guide to identification, categorisation, probability–impact scoring, ownership, controls, RAG rating, design, and ongoing review

This Practice Note is aimed at in-house counsel. It sets out how to build a legal risk register — a device for gathering all legal risk details in one location — by classifying each legal threat the organisation encounters, assigning a score to each, and then determining the controls or mitigations to apply effectively across the enterprise as appropriate. To craft a robust legal risk register, start by spotting the legal exposures your business confronts. It is also worthwhile to gauge your organisation’s tolerance for risk at this stage. What is risk? Many organisations maintain a written definition, against which their overall risk environment — and the legal component within it — can be recognised and mapped. If your organisation already has a definition, evaluate it and, if it proves practical, you are well placed to consider what amounts to legal risk. If not, you should assist the organisation in developing a usable definition. A clear, practical way to express risk is: Risk = probability x...

Read More Right Arrow

View the related Precedents about RAG

PRECEDENTS
Legal risk register precedent (Excel) with sample and blank worksheets, plus guidance to identify, categorise, score and mitigate legal operations and wider legal risks, with RAG ratings and action points

Please click to access the Precedent. Please note this register has been created in Excel, and therefore it cannot be downloaded into Word. For detailed guidance on completing a legal risk register, see Practice Note: How to create a legal risk register. However, a concise summary is set out briefly below. What is a legal risk register? A legal risk register is a means of gathering and overseeing all legal risk information in a single location. To produce an effective and reliable register, you must first determine the legal risks your organisation encounters. Understanding your organisation’s risk appetite is also highly advantageous. The register then lets you classify each risk appropriately, assign a score to it, and choose mitigation measures and actions. Separate Precedents exist for a general risk register and for a privacy risk register-see Precedents: Risk register and Privacy risk register. Identifying risks To create a robust risk register, you must start by identifying the risks your organisation faces. This work may already have...

Read More Right Arrow
PRECEDENTS
Risk Register Precedent and Practitioner Guide for Legal Teams: Identification, Categorisation, Impact–Probability Scoring, RAG Rating, Accept/Reject Decisions, Controls and Mitigation

Please click to open the Precedent risk register. Please note this register is produced in Excel and, as a result, it cannot be downloaded into Word. What is a risk register? A risk register gathers and manages all of your risk information in one place. To build a sound register, start by pinpointing the risks your organisation encounters, and develop an appreciation of the organisation’s appetite for risk. The register then allows you to classify each risk the organisation faces, score each one, and decide on your response to every risk—e.g. reject or accept—and, where you accept the risk, to control or mitigate that risk. Depending on the scale and character of your business, you might keep separate registers by department or by risk type, with key priorities feeding into a single overarching register. For a sample privacy risk register, see Precedent: Privacy risk register. For a sample legal risk register, see Precedent: Legal risk register. Identifying risks To produce an effective register, you...

Read More Right Arrow