Powered by Lexis+®

Related Glossary Terms

CASE STUDY

“Although cost was an important factor, our relationship with LexisNexis, their responsiveness, flexibility, and the integration available with other products were key factors.”

Irwin Mitchell

Access all documents on Ratio decidendi

Ratio decidendi meaning

What does Ratio decidendi mean?
The core legal principle or rule that explains why a court reached its decision in a case. In practice, the ratio decidendi is the proposition of law applied to the material facts and necessary to the outcome; it is the element of a judgment (or opinion) that creates binding precedent under the doctrine of stare decisis. Not defined by statute, this is a common-law, case-law concept used across England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland. Usage is broadly consistent, though the weight of authority follows each jurisdiction’s appellate hierarchy. The ratio is identified from the reasoning of the court, typically the majority in appellate courts, and is distinguished from obiter dicta, which are not binding. A case may contain more than one ratio where there are independent grounds for the result, and later courts may characterise a ratio narrowly or widely when they follow, apply, distinguish, limit or overrule precedent. Understanding and articulating the ratio decidendi is essential for case analysis, citation, and advising on the precedential value of authorities in common law litigation and advisory practice.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.

View the related Practice Notes about Ratio decidendi

PRACTICE NOTES
Precedent in England and Wales: Ratio/Obiter, Supreme Court Practice Statement, Appellate and Tribunal Rules, Privy Council, HRA and Retained EU Law

Precedent at common law Observance of precedent is a crucial feature of common law adjudication. When a precedent is binding, later courts should, in the ordinary course, follow and respect it. The binding effect operates in two ways: Vertical stare decisis: Decisions of higher courts must be honoured by courts below. In Cassell & Co Ltd v Broome, the Lord Chancellor underlined that, within this country’s court hierarchy, each lower tier must loyally accept the rulings of the higher tiers. In Willers v Joyce (No 2), Lord Neuberger explained that, in a common law system where judges make the law in some areas and develop it in virtually all, the doctrine of precedent (stare decisis) is fundamental; determinations of law by more senior courts have to be accepted by more junior courts, otherwise the law becomes anarchic and forfeits coherence, clarity and predictability. Horizontal stare decisis: Courts of co-ordinate jurisdiction should, as a general rule, follow one another’s decisions. This means, for ...

Read More Right Arrow